Volume 199, Issue 3 pp. 179-180
Clinical focus

Psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease

Nick Glozier MB BS, FRANZCP, PhD

Nick Glozier MB BS, FRANZCP, PhD

Professor of Psychological Medicine

Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Search for more papers by this author
Geoffrey H Tofler MB BS, MD, FRACP

Geoffrey H Tofler MB BS, MD, FRACP

Professor of Preventive Cardiology

Cardiology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Search for more papers by this author
David M Colquhoun MB BS, FRACP, FCSANZ

David M Colquhoun MB BS, FRACP, FCSANZ

Associate Professor of Medicine

University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen J Bunker RN, PhD

Stephen J Bunker RN, PhD

Adjunct Senior Lecturer

Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders University and Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
David M Clarke PhD, FRACGP, FRANZCP

David M Clarke PhD, FRACGP, FRANZCP

Professor and Psychiatrist, Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Service, Monash Medical Centre

School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
David L Hare DPM, FRACP, FCSANZ

David L Hare DPM, FRACP, FCSANZ

Professorial Fellow and Coordinator of Cardiovascular Research

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
Ian B Hickie MD, FRANZCP, FASSA

Ian B Hickie MD, FRANZCP, FASSA

Professor of Psychiatry

Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Search for more papers by this author
James Tatoulis MB BS, MD, FRACS

James Tatoulis MB BS, MD, FRACS

Chief Medical Advisor

National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
David R Thompson MA, PhD, FRCN

David R Thompson MA, PhD, FRCN

Professor of Nursing

Cardiovascular Research Centre, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
Alison Wilson MBA

Alison Wilson MBA

National Manager, Clinical Programs

National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC.

Search for more papers by this author
Maree G Branagan MPH

Corresponding Author

Maree G Branagan MPH

Project Officer, Clinical Programs

National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC.

Correspondence: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 August 2013
Citations: 75

Summary

  • In 2003, the National Heart Foundation of Australia published a position statement on psychosocial risk factors and coronary heart disease (CHD). This consensus statement provides an updated review of the literature on psychosocial stressors, including chronic stressors (in particular, work stress), acute individual stressors and acute population stressors, to guide health professionals based on current evidence. It complements a separate updated statement on depression and CHD.
  • Perceived chronic job strain and shift work are associated with a small absolute increased risk of developing CHD, but there is limited evidence regarding their effect on the prognosis of CHD.
  • Evidence regarding a relationship between CHD and job (in)security, job satisfaction, working hours, effort–reward imbalance and job loss is inconclusive.
  • Expert consensus is that workplace programs aimed at weight loss, exercise and other standard cardiovascular risk factors may have positive outcomes for these risk factors, but no evidence is available regarding the effect of such programs on the development of CHD.
  • Social isolation after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an adverse prognosis. Expert consensus is that although measures to reduce social isolation are likely to produce positive psychosocial effects, it is unclear whether this would also improve CHD outcomes.
  • Acute emotional stress may trigger MI or takotsubo (“stress”) cardiomyopathy, but the absolute increase in transient risk from an individual stressor is low.
  • Psychosocial stressors have an impact on CHD, but clinical significance and prevention require further study.
  • Awareness of the potential for increased cardiovascular risk among populations exposed to natural disasters and other conditions of extreme stress may be useful for emergency services response planning.
  • Wider public access to defibrillators should be available where large populations gather, such as sporting venues and airports, and as part of the response to natural and other disasters.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.