Institutions investigating allegations of research misconduct are vulnerable to claims that their processes are inadequate or that they have an institutional conflict of interest.
The Office of Research Integrity in the United States
- sets down standards for and reviews the adequacy of investigations of research misconduct by institutions;
- recognises that internal politics and the involvement of non-experts can lead to honest mistakes being regarded as serious misconduct;
- requires complainants and investigators to act “in good faith”; and
- reduces damaging publicity when complaints are misconceived or false.
Australia needs an office of academic integrity to ensure that
- all complaints are thoroughly investigated;
- the investigative procedures meet international standards;
- fair processes are provided for complainants and respondents; and
- institutions are protected from claims of “cover-up” and institutional conflict of interest.

References

1Chong S, Normile D. Stem cells. How young Korean researchers helped unearth a scandal [news]. Science 2006; 311: 22–25. .
10.1126/science.311.5757.22
Google Scholar
2Couzin J. Stem cells … and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors [news]. Science 2006; 311: 23–24. .
10.1126/science.311.5757.23
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Gerber P. What we can learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? Med J Aust 2006; 184: 632–635./journal/2006/184/12/what-can-we-learn-hwang-and-sudb-affairs..
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00420.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 609–613. .
10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5White C. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ 2005; 331: 281–288. .
10.1136/bmj.331.7511.281
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6Smith R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. BMJ 2005; 331: 288–291. .
10.1136/bmj.331.7511.288
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Rennie D. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998; 316: 1726–1728. .
10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1726
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8Rennie D, Gunsalus CK. Scientific misconduct: new definition, procedures and office — perhaps a new leaf. JAMA 1993; 269: 915–917. .
10.1001/jama.1993.03500070095037
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9Riis P. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark. BMJ 1998; 316: 1733. .
PubMed Google Scholar
10 S Lock, F Wells, MJG Frathings, editors. Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research. 3rd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
Google Scholar
11Anderson WP, Cordner CD, Breen KJ. Strengthening Australia's framework for research oversight [editorial]. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 261–263./journal/2006/184/6/strengthening-australia-s-framework-research-oversight..
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00232.x
Google Scholar
12Van Der Weyden MB. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research [editorial]. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 430–431./journal/2006/184/9/preventing-and-processing-research-misconduct-new-australian-code-responsible..
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00312.x
Google Scholar
13 Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct; Final Rule; 42 CFR Parts 50 and 93. Part III. Federal Register 2003; 70 (94): 28369–284000. (Rules and Regulations, May 17, 2005) http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/documents/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005.pdf (accessed Oct 2006).
Google Scholar
14 National Health and Medical Research Council/Australian Vice Chancellors’ Committee. Joint NHMRC/AVCC statement and guidelines on research practice. Canberra: NHMRC, AVCC, 1997. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/funding/policy/researchprac.htm (accessed Oct 2006.
Google Scholar
15 Medical Research Council. Policy and Procedure for Inquiring into Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. London: Medical Research Council, 1997. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002454 (accessed Nov 2006).
Google Scholar
16Riis P. Misconduct in clinical research — the Scandinavian experience and actions for prevention. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 89–92. .
10.1080/028418699431852
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Office of Research Integrity. Annual Report 2005. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of Public Health and Science, May 2006. http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/documents/annual_reports/ori_annual_report_2005.pdf (accessed Nov 2006).
Google Scholar
18Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435: 737–738. .
10.1038/435737a
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19Kevles D. A beautiful paper. In: The Baltimore case. A trial of politics, science and character. Chapter 1. New York, NY: WW Norton & Co, 1998: 1–33.
Google Scholar
20Baltimore D. Baltimore's travels continued. Issues in Science and Technology Online. Summer 2003. http://www.issues.org/19.4/baltimore.html (accessed Nov 2006).
Google Scholar
21Baltimore D. Dr Baltimore says “sorry”. Nature 1991; 351: 94–95. .
10.1038/351094a0
Google Scholar
22Marshall E. Scientific misconduct: crime scene investigation. How to handle misconduct. Science 2006; 312: 1465. .
10.1126/science.312.5779.1465
Google Scholar
23Hall B. Response of Professor Bruce M Hall to Senator K Carr. Tabling of the report of the External Independent Inquiry into Scientific Misconduct, commissioned by the Council of the University of New South Wales. Australian Senate, Hansard 9 August 2004.
Google Scholar
24Hume RW. Report by the Vice-Chancellor on findings relative to allegations of misconduct against Professor Bruce Hall. University of New South Wales. December 2003. http://www.secretariat.unsw.edu.au/council/Hall_Matter_3/Hall_Docs/Report_%20by_the_Vice-Chancellor_23_Dec_03.pdf (accessed Nov 2006).
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume185, Issue11-12

December 2006

Pages 619-622

Australia needs an office of academic integrity

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Australia needs an office of academic integrity

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information