Volume 20, Issue 2 pp. 235-243
Full Access

CHOICE OF A TERMINATING OVER A NON-TERMINATING SIGNAL IN FREE-OPERANT AVOIDANCE

Stuart Culbertson

Corresponding Author

Stuart Culbertson

THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AND BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY

Thanks to C. B. Ferster and Philip Silverman for helpful readings of this paper.

Department of Psychology, The American University, Washington, D.C. 20016Search for more papers by this author
Pietro Badia

Pietro Badia

THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AND BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY

Search for more papers by this author
First published: September 1973
Citations: 2

Abstract

Rats chose between two signalled avoidance schedules. Under one schedule, responses in the presence of the signal terminated it and resulted in avoidance of shock; in the other, responses in the presence of the signal resulted in shock avoidance but signal termination was delayed for 10 sec. Pressing a second (changeover) lever produced change from one schedule to the other for 1 min. Once this 1-min period timed out, subjects could remain under the schedule in effect or could reinstate the other schedule for another 1-min period. All four subjects continuously changed over from the non-terminating to the terminating signal schedule. Changeover responding was not maintained when the termination contingency was removed. When changeover responding resulted in a change from a terminating to a non-terminating signal schedule, changeover responding did not occur.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.