Volume 11, Issue 2 pp. 147-152
Full Access

PUNISHED AND UNPUNISHED RESPONDING IN MULTIPLE VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES1

Carole Tullis

Carole Tullis

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

Search for more papers by this author
Gary Walters

Corresponding Author

Gary Walters

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto 5, Ontario, Canada.Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1968
Citations: 8

Research supported by Grant APA-161 from the National Research Council of Canada and Grant #107 of the Ontario Mental Health Foundation to G. Walters.

Abstract

The performance of rats trained on multiple variable-interval schedules was examined before, during, and after punishment. The same linear function related relative response rates to relative density of reinforcement both in the presence and absence of punishment. Equal relative suppression was seen in both the high and low reinforcement density components. The intercept value of the function was zero. Each component of the schedule was programmed on a separate lever: thus during any component, there was an opportunity for responses on the nonoperative lever (errors). The proportions of these errors declined to a near-zero value during punishment and did not regain their prepunishment values after punishment was removed, suggesting that some discrimination learning occurred during punishment. Recovery of response rate during punishment was seen only where a greater-than-zero probability of reinforcement was associated with the response.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.