Volume 31, Issue 3 pp. 485-488

IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF SELF-REPORTS OF ADHERENCE

Jack W. Finney

Corresponding Author

Jack W. Finney

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0436 (E-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this author
Dana E. Putnam

Dana E. Putnam

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher M. Boyd

Christopher M. Boyd

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 February 2013
Citations: 8

Abstract

Behavioral scientists who study socially important but difficult-to-measure behaviors often rely on self-reports. We evaluated the influence of three experimenter demands—demand for adherence, demand for accurate reports, and demand for accurate reports combined with a prompted recall strategy—on the accuracy of self-reports of adherence to a week-long prescribed regimen of twice-daily telephone calls. Self-reports of adherence were significantly more accurate in the accuracy demand/prompted recall group (p < .05). The analogue study should be replicated with other regimens and populations to determine the most effective strategies for enhancing the accuracy of self-reports.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.