Volume 125, Issue 6 pp. 831-843
Article
Full Access

Causes of Declining Survival of Lake Trout Stocked in U.S. Waters of Lake Superior in 1963–1986

Michael J. Hansen

Michael J. Hansen

National Biological Service, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark P. Ebener

Mark P. Ebener

Chippewa-Ottawa Treaty Fishery Management Authority, Inter-Tribal Fisheries and Assessment Program, 186 East Three Mile Road, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, 49783 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard G. Schorfhaar

Richard G. Schorfhaar

Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Marquette Fisheries Station, 488 Cherry Creek Road, Marquette, Michigan, 49855 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen T. Schram

Stephen T. Schram

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Lake Superior Office, 141 South 3rdBox 589, Bayfield, Wisconsin, 54814 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Donald R. Schreiner

Donald R. Schreiner

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lake Superior Area Fisheries Program, 5351 North Shore Drive, Duluth, Minnesota, 55804 USA

Search for more papers by this author
James H. Selgeby

James H. Selgeby

National Biological Service, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Superior Biological Station2800 East Lake Shore Drive, Ashland, Wisconsin, 54806 USA

Search for more papers by this author
William W. Taylor

William W. Taylor

Michigan State University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824 USA

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Survival of the 1963–1982 year-classes of stocked yearling lake trout Salvelinus namaycush declined significantly over time in Lake Superior. To investigate possible causes of this decline, a Ricker model of stock–recruitment was used to describe the catch per effort (CPE) of age-7 stocked lake trout in the Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin waters of Lake Superior as functions of the numbers of yearlings stocked 6 years earlier (an index of density dependence), the density (CPE) of wild adult lake trout (an index of predation), and large-mesh (≥114-mm stretch-measure) gill-net fishing effort (an index of fishing mortality). Declining CPE of stocked lake trout in Michigan and Wisconsin was significantly associated with increasing large-mesh gill-net fishing effort. Declining CPE of stocked lake trout in Minnesota was significantly associated with increasing density of wild lake trout. Declining survival of stocked lake trout may therefore have been caused by increased mortality in large-mesh gill-net fisheries in Michigan and Wisconsin, and by predation by wild lake trout that recently recolonized the Minnesota area. We recommend that experimental management be pursued to determine the relative importance of large-mesh gill-net fishing effort and of predation by wild lake trout on the survival of stocked lake trout in U.S. waters of Lake Superior.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.