Volume 13, Issue 7 pp. 727-732
Free Access

Reliability of a Core Competency Checklist Assessment in the Emergency Department: The Standardized Direct Observation Assessment Tool

Philip Shayne MD

Corresponding Author

Philip Shayne MD

Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University (PS), Atlanta, GA

Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Atlanta, GA 30305. Fax: 404-616-0191; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Fiona Gallahue MD

Fiona Gallahue MD

Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital (FG), Brooklyn, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Stephan Rinnert MD

Stephan Rinnert MD

Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate/Kings County (SR), Brooklyn, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Craig L. Anderson MPH, PhD

Craig L. Anderson MPH, PhD

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine Medical Center (CLA), Irvine, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Gene Hern MD

Gene Hern MD

Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center (GH), Oakland, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Katz MD

Eric Katz MD

Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University (EK), St. Louis, MO.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 June 2008
Citations: 57

Abstract

Objectives: A Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors task force developed the Standardized Direct Observation Assessment Tool (SDOT), a 26-item checklist assessment tool to evaluate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident core competencies by direct observation. Each of the checklist items is assigned to one or more of five core competencies. The objective of this study was to test the interrater measurement properties of the SDOT instrument.

Methods: Two videos of simulated patient–resident–attending physician encounters were produced. Academic emergency medicine faculty members not involved in the development of the form viewed the two encounters and completed the SDOT for each. Faculty demographic data were collected. Data were collected from 82 faculty members at 16 emergency medicine residency programs. The checklist items were used to generate a composite score for each core competency of patient care, medical knowledge, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice.

Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated a high degree of agreement between evaluators in evaluating residents for both videos. Multivariate analysis found no differences in rating by faculty when examined by experience, academic title, site, or previous use of the SDOT.

Conclusions: Faculty from 16 emergency medicine residency programs had a high interrater agreement when using the SDOT to evaluate resident core competency performance. This study did not test the validity of the tool. This data analysis is mainly descriptive, and scripted video scenarios may not approximate direct observation in the emergency department.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.