Volume 10, Issue 3 pp. 233-243
Free Access

Rapid Two-stage Emergency Department Intervention for Seniors: Impact on Continuity of Care

Jane McCusker MD, DrPH

Corresponding Author

Jane McCusker MD, DrPH

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, Québec (JM, ND, EB)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital Center, 3830 Lacombe Avenue, Room 2508, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1M5, Canada. Fax: 514-734-2652; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Nandini Dendukuri PhD

Nandini Dendukuri PhD

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, Québec (JM, ND, EB)

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Tousignant MD, MSc

Pierre Tousignant MD, MSc

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec (JM, ND, PT), Santé Publique, Montréal, Québec (PT)

Search for more papers by this author
Josée Verdon MD, MSc

Josée Verdon MD, MSc

Centre Hospitalier Ambulatoire Régionale de Laval (CHARL), Laval, Québec (JV)

Cité de la Santé Hôpital, Laval, Québec (JV)

Search for more papers by this author
Louise Poulin de Courval MD, DPH

Louise Poulin de Courval MD, DPH

Centre Local de Services Communautaires Côtes-des-Neiges, Montréal, Québec (LP) Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec (LP), Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Belzile MSc

Eric Belzile MSc

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, Québec (JM, ND, EB)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 June 2008
Citations: 88

Abstract

Objectives: A two-stage intervention comprising screening and a brief standardized nursing assessment and referral, for emergency department (ED) patients aged 65 years and over, reduced the rate of functional decline four months after the visit, without increasing societal costs. In this study, the authors investigated the effects of the intervention on the process of care at, and during the month after, the ED visit. Methods: Patients at four Montreal hospital EDs were randomized by day of visit to the intervention or to usual care. Patients admitted to the hospital were excluded. Measures of process of care included: referrals and visits to the primary physician and to the local community health center, for home care or other services, and return ED visits. Data sources included hospital charts, patient questionnaires, and provincial administrative databases. Results: The study sample included 166 intervention and 179 control group patients ready for discharge from the ED. Intervention group patients were more likely to have a chart-documented referral to their local community health center [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.7 to 9.5] and their primary physician [adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.4], and to have received home care services one month after the ED visit [adjusted OR 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1 to 5.1]. Unexpectedly, they were also more likely to make a return visit to the ED [adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.6]. Conclusions: The beneficial outcomes of the intervention appear to result primarily from the early provision of home care rather than early contact with the primary physician.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.