Volume 7, Issue S1 A74
Meeting Abstract
Open Access

Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with 15-marker set in normal adults

Sang Gyo Seo

Corresponding Author

Sang Gyo Seo

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Dong Yeon Lee

Dong Yeon Lee

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Ji-Beom Kim

Ji-Beom Kim

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Seong Hyun Kim

Seong Hyun Kim

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Hye Sun Park

Hye Sun Park

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Hyo Jeong Yoo

Hyo Jeong Yoo

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sung Ju Kim

Sung Ju Kim

Department of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Jihyeung Kim

Jihyeung Kim

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Kyoung Min Lee

Kyoung Min Lee

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Chin Youb Chung

Chin Youb Chung

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
In Ho Choi

In Ho Choi

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 April 2014
Citations: 1

Several 3D multi-segment foot models (MFMs) have been introduced for the in vivo analysis of dynamic foot kinematics [1, 2]. However, there is scanty evidence available to support their clinical use. Considering the potential of MFM to assess the function in foot pathology, there is a need for simple, reproducible and reliable multi-segment foot models. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of a simple MFM with 15-marker set.

Twenty healthy adults mean aged 28.9 years (10 males and 10 females) were tested. Eight markers of 15-marker set were placed in foot to evaluate segmental foot motion. Three representative strides from five separate trials were used for analysis from each session. Kinematic data of foot segmental motion was collected and tracked using the Foot3D Multi-Segment Software (Motion Analysis Co., Santa Rosa. CA). Retests were performed in the same manner with an interval of 4 weeks. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) and intra-class correlation (ICC) were calculated in order to assess the inter-trial and inter-session repeatability. Inter-segment foot angles from healthy adults from a MFM with 15-marker set showed a narrow range of variability during the whole gait cycle.

The mean inter-trial ICC (± Standard deviation) was 0.981 (± 0.010), which was interpreted as excellent. The mean inter-trial CMC (± Standard deviation) was 0.948 (± 0.027), which was interpreted as excellent or very good repeatability. The mean inter-session ICC (±SD) was 0.886 (± 0.047) and the mean inter-session CMC (±SD) was 0.801 (± 0.077), which were interpreted as excellent or very good repeatability. The lowest repeatability was in the transverse plane at the forefoot and the most consistent finding was observed at the sagittal plane of the hallux and hindfoot (Table 1, Figure 1).

Table 1. Repeatability of foot kinematics
Inter-trial Inter-session
CMC ICC CMC ICC
Hallux
Flex/Ext 0.971 0.990 0.796 0.880
Rotation 0.970 0.990 0.951 0.974
Hindfoot
Flex/Ext 0.931 0.976 0.837 0.911
Pro/Sup 0.890 0.961 0.697 0.838
Rotation 0.927 0.974 0.728 0.820
Arch
Height 0.959 0.992 0.798 0.883
Length 0.909 0.998 0.980 0.840
Index* 0.952 0.972 0.729 0.989
Forefoot
Flex/Ext 0.978 0.986 0.840 0.913
Pro/Sup 0.993 0.968 0.687 0.814
Rotation 0.972 0.983 0.813 0.890
Medial forefoot
Flex/Ext 0.956 0.984 0.834 0.909
Pro/Sup 0.916 0.975 0.808 0.892
Rotation 0.949 0.985 0.808 0.893
Lateral forefoot
Flex/Ext 0.957 0.985 0.765 0.866
Pro/Sup 0.929 0.970 0.763 0.865
Rotation 0.954 0.983 0.790 0.877
Details are in the caption following the image

Walking kinematics for the 1st and 2nd visit (average with a range representing 2 standard deviations). Each row shows the motion of each segment: hallux, hindfoot, arch, forefoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot motion. Each column represents motion in each of the three planes (sagittal, coronal, transverse plane). Horizontal axis represents gait cycle, and vertical axis represents range of motion.

We demonstrated a MFM with 15-marker set had high inter-trial and inter-session repeatability, especially in sagittal plane motion. We thought this MFM would be applicable to evaluation of the motion of the foot segment during gait.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.