Volume 3, Issue 4 pp. 43-58
Full Access

Planning Biodegradable Waste Management in Stockholm

Anna Björklund

Corresponding Author

Anna Björklund

Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Division of Industrial Ecology Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology Royal Institute of Technology Osquars backe 7 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail[email protected]http:www.ima.kth.seSearch for more papers by this author
Charlotte Bjuggren

Charlotte Bjuggren

Division of Life-Cycle Assessment and Waste Research Swedish Environmental Research Institute Stockholm, Sweden

Now with Samarbetande KonsulterAB, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Magnus Dalemo

Magnus Dalemo

Division of Biological Waste Treatment Swedish Institute of Agricultural Engineering Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Ulf Sonesson

Ulf Sonesson

Department of Agricultural Engineering Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala, Sweden

Now with the Swedith Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2008
Citations: 37

Summary

The environmental impact of the management of biodegradable waste in Stockholm, based mainly on incineration and landfilling, was compared to systems with significant nutrient recycling; large-scale composting, anaerobic digestion, and separate collection and utilization of urine. The systems' emissions, residual products, energy turnover, and resource consumption were evaluated from a life-cycle perspective, using a computerized model, ORWARE (ORganic WAste REsearch model).

Transportation was of relatively low importance to overall environmental impact, even at high rates of nutrient recycling. This is remarkable considering the geographical setting of Stockholm, with high population density and little nearby farmland. Ancillary systems, such as generation of electricity and district heating, were crucial for the overall outcome.

Increased recycling of nutrients in solid biodegradable waste in Stockholm can reduce net environmental impact, whereas separation of human urine to be spread as fertilizer cannot yet be introduced without increased acidification. Increased nutrient recycling from solid biodegradable waste inevitably increases spreading of metals on arable land. Urine is by far the least contaminated residual product. Spreading of all other residuals would be limited by their metal content.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.