Volume 2024, Issue 1 8884030

Research Article

Open Access

Incremental Load Respiratory Muscle Training Improves Respiratory Muscle Strength and Pulmonary Function in Children with Bronchiectasis

Xiaolong Chen

orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-3757

Rehabilitation Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Intelligent Rehabilitation Research Center, China-USA Institute for Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Shidong Hu,

Shidong Hu

orcid.org/0009-0000-0146-4104

Department of Pediatric Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaohui Jia,

Xiaohui Jia

orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-6503

Department of Pediatric Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Bingbing Zeng,

Corresponding Author

Bingbing Zeng

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-2221

Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaolong Chen,

Xiaolong Chen

orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-3757

Rehabilitation Medicine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Intelligent Rehabilitation Research Center, China-USA Institute for Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Shidong Hu,

Shidong Hu

orcid.org/0009-0000-0146-4104

Department of Pediatric Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaohui Jia,

Xiaohui Jia

orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-6503

Department of Pediatric Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Bingbing Zeng,

Corresponding Author

Bingbing Zeng

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-2221

Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, China wmu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 23 May 2024

https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8884030

Academic Editor: Alexandru Corlateanu

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

Background and Objective. To explore the effect of respiratory muscle training on children with bronchiectasis. Methods. Participants underwent respiratory muscle training for 24 weeks. The main results were changes in respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function indices (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), forced expiratory flow 25–75% (FEF25–75%), and maximal midexpiratory flow 75/25 (MMEF75/25)) before, 12 weeks after, and 24 weeks after the intervention. The secondary outcomes were changes in the exercise load and work rate, exercise work, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scale, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Results. Compared with before the intervention, after 24 weeks of respiratory muscle training, the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) were significantly enhanced (P < 0.05), while FVC, FEV1, and PEF were significantly increased (P < 0.01). FEF25–75 and MMEF75/25 values showed significant improvement compared to those before training (P < 0.05). The exercise loading, work, and exercise work rate of expiratory muscle training were significantly improved compared to those before intervention (P < 0.05). The LCQ score increased significantly (P < 0.001), and the FSS score decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Incremental load respiratory muscle training effectively improved children’s lung function over the long term, improved the strength of their inspiratory and expiratory muscles, and improved their quality of life.

1. Introduction

Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung disease. The main clinical manifestations are cough and expectoration, a large amount of airway secretions, and restricted movement [1]. The incidence rate of bronchiectasis is increasing yearly with the ageing of the population [2]. With the development of the medical detection technology, the number of cases of bronchiectasis in children is also increasing. Patients with bronchiectasis usually have varying degrees of respiratory muscle weakness [3]. Inspiratory muscle weakness leads to slower contraction of inspiratory muscles and insufficient lung ventilation, which cannot provide adequate inspiration thus affecting expiration [4]. Expiratory muscle weakness leads to cough weakness and repeated production of sputum, which leads to difficulty in sputum clearance and finally causes bronchial infection [5, 6]. Conventional drugs such as bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs cannot continuously improve symptoms, and long-term use of corticosteroids can actually lead to respiratory muscle dysfunction [7]. Bronchiectasis can have harmful effects on lung function and even lead to permanent structural loss of the small airways [8]. The repeated deterioration of the disease will have a harmful impact on the lung function and growth of children and seriously affect their quality of life [9].

Respiratory muscle training is a lung rehabilitation program [10], and other programs include active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT), postural drainage, chest expansion training, and other airway clearance techniques [11]. Studies have shown that the respiratory muscle training can improve the strength of the inspiratory and expiratory muscles in critically ill patients, and it has a certain tolerance level [12]. Respiratory muscle training can not only promote sputum discharge in the short term and maintain airway cleanliness but also improve the lung function, enhance respiratory muscle strength and endurance, and improve quality of life [13].

Previous studies have shown that respiratory muscle training can improve the lung function and respiratory muscle strength in various respiratory diseases to varying degrees [14]. For example, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), improvements in respiratory muscle strength and endurance can be observed after systemic or specific respiratory muscle endurance training [15–17]. Respiratory muscle training, as a type of lung rehabilitation program, is gradually being applied to the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis [18]. However, there is limited research on the therapeutic effect of respiratory muscle training on children with bronchiectasis, and there is also a lack of research on the long-term therapeutic effect of therapy in children with bronchiectasis.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore whether respiratory muscle training could effectively improve the lung function of children with bronchiectasis in the long term. We hypothesized that respiratory muscle training would have a significant effect on improving respiratory muscle strength and lung function in children with bronchiectasis.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study was a 24-week pre- and post-controlled clinical trial to train respiratory muscles in children with bronchiectasis. This study was conducted under the guidance of Chen Xiaolong’s cardiopulmonary physiotherapist. It was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (2022-k-31-01). All patients signed informed consent forms.

2.2. Study Population

From June 2021 to December 2021, seventeen children with clinically stable bronchiectasis aged 5–15 years were included. The inclusion criteria included children, who were in stable condition (no deterioration in the previous month), had sputum production and could not be discharged within one year before receiving treatment, and had never received any lung rehabilitation plan, with bronchiectasis confirmed by chest CT images in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The exclusion criteria included children with cystic fibrosis, deterioration of the disease in the past month, participation in the lung rehabilitation program, inability to implement the lung rehabilitation program or inability to participate in medical treatment, and any physical therapy contraindications.

2.3. Study Procedures

Children were trained with a Xeek threshold loading device. First, the threshold loading device was used to detect the patient’s lung function, measure MIP and MEP, and then set 30% of the MIP and MEP as the initial training intensity according to the assessment results. The assessment process is as follows: before performing respiratory muscle training in children with bronchitis, there is a section for evaluating respiratory muscle function in the data feedback system connected to the respiratory muscle trainer. The child underwent eight forceful inhalation and exhalation sessions to obtain evaluation data (MIP and MEP), and then set training thresholds based on the evaluation results for training. The training intensity continued and gradually increased to the maximum allowable intensity. The training time was 10 times/session, 8 sessions a day, with 4 sessions of inspiratory muscle training and 4 sessions of expiratory muscle training. Training was performed 5 days a week, and the whole training cycle lasted for 24 weeks. During the whole study period, the children’s training was completed under the guidance of the therapist, and the children maintained the routine use of respiratory drugs.

2.4. Assessments

The severity of bronchiectasis was evaluated with the BSI score [19] before respiratory muscle training. The respiratory muscle strength and lung function of children were evaluated before respiratory muscle training, after 12 weeks of training and after 24 weeks of training. The main lung function indicators were FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEF, FEF25–75, and MMEF75/25. The LCQ rating scale was used to measure the quality of life [20]. The degree of fatigue in children was evaluated with the FSS [21]. At the same time, respiratory trainers recorded the changes in muscle strength, exercise loading, exercise work rate, exercise work, and other related indicators.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The measured data were analysed and categorized into primary and secondary results. The normality of the data was evaluated. The normal distribution of data was evaluated using one-way ANOVA with repeated measures to assess the changes in variables before and after the group. If the data were not normally distributed, the Mann‒Whitney test was used. Each time point and the changes compared to the baseline were compared. A P value <0.05 was considered to indicate significance.

3. Results

Seventeen children with clinically stable bronchiectasis participated in this study. Two of them were unable to use the device correctly and interrupted the study (see Figure 1).

Details are in the caption following the image — **Figure 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

Study flowchart (intention-to-treat analysis).

3.1. Demographics and Anthropometrics

The subjects were similar in age, sex, height, and weight before and after treatment; the severity of bronchiectasis was assessed by the BSI score (see Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics at the time of study registration and severity grading evaluated using BSI scores.

Characteristics	Included subjects
Age (years)	11.05 ± 1.25
Gender (female/male)	9/6
Height (cm)	143.68 ± 5.69
Weight (kg)	36.00 ± 4.83
BMI (kg/m²)	16.68 ± 1.04
BSI severity classification
Mild	3
Moderate	4
Severe	8

Statistically significant values are given in bold. BSI: Bronchiectasis Severity Index.

3.2. Respiratory Muscle Strength and Pulmonary Function Indices

Before training, the respiratory muscle strength of the children with bronchiectasis significantly weakened, and the PEF significantly decreased. After 12 weeks of the respiratory muscle training, the expiratory muscle strength (MEP) of the children improved compared to before training, but the improvement was not significant (MEP: P = 0.071) (see Table 2), and the PEF value was also significantly higher than before training (P = 0.001) (see Table 3). The FEV1 and FVC of the children were significantly improved (FEV1: P = 0.004; FVC: P = 0.011) (see Table 3). After 24 weeks of training, the strength of the expiratory and inspiratory muscles of the children were significantly increased compared to before training (MEP: P = 0.02; MIP: P = 0.035) (see Tables 2 and 4). The patient’s tolerance for the expiratory exercise loading, the expiratory work rate, and the expiratory work also significantly increased (expiratory exercise loading: P = 0.023; expiratory work rate: P = 0.007;expiratory work: P = 0.04) (see Table 2). However, throughout the 24-week inspiratory muscle training cycle, there was no significant increase in children’s tolerance to the inspiratory exercise loading, the inspiratory work, and the inspiratory work rate (inspiratory exercise loading: P = 0.11; inspiratory work rate: P = 0.147; inspiratory work: P = 0.426) (see Table 4). The main indices of the lung function (FVC, FEV1, and PEF) in the children also showed significant improvement (FVC: P = 0.001; FEV1: P = 0.0004; PEF: P = 0.0001) see Table 3. FEV1/FVC showed little change throughout the training cycle (P = 0.173) see Table 3. The small airway index indicated that children with bronchiectasis had obvious small airway dysfunction. After 24 weeks of training, FEF25–75 and MMEF75/25 increased significantly (FEF25: P = 0.0001; FEF50: P = 0.001; FEF75: P = 0.045; MMEF75/25: P = 0.012) (see Table 3).

Table 2. Changes of expiratory muscles, expiratory exercise loading, expiratory work rate, and expiratory work, as well as the effect size of corresponding indicators.

Characteristics	Before training	12 weeks of training	24 weeks of training complete	P value1	P value2	P value3	Effect size
MEP (cm H₂O)	63.28 ± 18.06	74.91 ± 18.48	90.87 ± 19.42	0.071	0.049	0.020	0.69
MEP %pred	50.49 ± 9.51	58.92 ± 10.27	71.59 ± 10.75	0.076	0.026	0.009	0.64
EEL (cm H₂O)	34.17 ± 9.61	46.67 ± 10.46	71.67 ± 15.31	0.018	0.032	0.023	0.67
Expiratory work (J)	14.01 ± 4.56	23.91 ± 6.31	38.76 ± 11.57	0.116	0.092	0.04	0.38
Expiratory work rate (W)	17.45 ± 6.93	21.88 ± 7.00	27.57 ± 8.70	0.008	0.045	0.007	0.56

MEP: maximum expiratory pressure; EEL: expiratory exercise loading; P value1: comparison between before training and 12 weeks of training; P value2: comparison between 24 weeks of training and 12 weeks of training; P value3: comparison between after 24 weeks of training and before training.

Table 3. Changes in lung function-related indicators, LCQ scale score, and FSS score, as well as the effect size of corresponding indicators.

Characteristics	Before training	12 weeks of training	24 weeks of training complete	P value1	P value2	P value3	Effect size
FEV1 (liters)	1.72 ± 0.84	1.92 ± 0.94	2.08 ± 0.90	0.004	0.088	0.0004	0.67
FEV1%pred	67.99 ± 11.75	75.93 ± 11.79	83.65 ± 13.32	0.0004	0.035	0.0003	0.72
FVC (liters)	2.31 ± 1.01	2.58 ± 1.19	2.80 ± 1.15	0.011	0.015	0.001	0.68
FVC%pred	78.24 ± 10.98	86.17 ± 12.89	94.69 ± 13.12	0.001	0.005	0.0001	0.79
FEV1/FVC%	83.67 ± 9.40	85.93 ± 12.40	87.42 ± 11.74	0.35	0.4	0.173	0.13
PEF (L/s)	3.94 ± 1.94	4.61 ± 2.18	4.98 ± 2.27	0.001	0.02	0.0001	0.79
PEF%pred	67.51 ± 9.79	79.53 ± 12.73	86.56 ± 9.45	0.001	0.04	0.0001	0.80
FEF25 (L/s)	3.08 ± 0.60	3.49 ± 0.61	3.98 ± 0.61	0.005	0.015	0.0001	0.77
FEF25%pred	56.54 ± 6.08	65.18 ± 6.10	72.45 ± 6.47	0.071	0.723	0.007	0.37
FEF50 (L/s)	1.55 ± 1.22	1.75 ± 1.38	1.97 ± 1.41	0.118	0.006	0.001	0.69
FEF50%pred	45.82 ± 20.51	51.60 ± 21.24	59.54 ± 23.02	0.042	0.019	0.0003	0.75
FEF75 (L/s)	0.59 ± 0.41	0.71 ± 0.60	0.95 ± 0.76	0.409	0.007	0.045	0.50
FEF75%pred	33.24 ± 15.65	39.13 ± 21.81	51.24 ± 30.15	0.372	0.04	0.042	0.52
MMEF75/25 (L/s)	1.27 ± 1.03	1.46 ± 1.27	1.71 ± 1.34	0.303	0.009	0.012	0.58
MMEF75/25%pred	42.01 ± 18.74	47.81 ± 20.42	57.61 ± 23.01	0.109	0.018	0.001	0.72
FSS score	52.25 ± 1.09	40.08 ± 0.72	29.67 ± 0.68	0.0003	0.0003	0.0003	0.98
LCQ
Physical	2.87 ± 036	4.22 ± 0.24	5.50 ± 0.13	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.88
Psychological	3.56 ± 0.42	4.56 ± 0.21	5.66 ± 0.14	0.007	0.001	0.002	0.67
Social	3.63 ± 0.47	4.52 ± 0.31	5.73 ± 0.15	0.006	0.002	0.002	0.66
Total (3–21)	10.05 ± 1.16	13.30 ± 0.72	16.89 ± 0.32	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.78

P value1: comparison between before training and 12 weeks of training; P value2: comparison between 24 weeks of training and 12 weeks of training; P value3: comparison between after 24 weeks of training and before training; FEV1: forced expiratory flow in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; PEF: peak expiratory flow; FEF25–75%: forced expiratory flow 25–75%; MMEF75/25: maximal midexpiratory flow75/25; LCQ: Leicester Cough Questionnaire; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale.

Table 4. Changes of inspiratory muscles, inspiratory exercise loading, inspiratory work rate, and inspiratory work, as well as the effect size of corresponding indicators.

Characteristics	Before training	12 weeks of training	24 weeks of training complete	P value1	P value2	P value3	Effect size
MIP (cm H₂O)	59.37 ± 16.33	66.30 ± 17.94	80.42 ± 20.40	0.148	0.072	0.035	0.57
MIP %pred	55.99 ± 10.22	59.04 ± 11.62	68.93 ± 14.49	0.57	0.333	0.321	0.29
IEL (cm H₂O)	35.83 ± 8.89	44.17 ± 10.52	59.17 ± 15.13	0.058	0.159	0.11	0.60
Inspiratory work (J)	12.92 ± 4.98	19.35 ± 4.21	30.96 ± 11.16	0.791	0.544	0.426	0.35
Inspiratory work rate (W)	9.77 ± 4.36	13.24 ± 4.45	17.10 ± 6.12	0.602	0.576	0.147	0.14

MIP: maximum inspiratory pressure; IEL: inspiratory exercise loading; P value1: comparison between before training and 12 weeks of training; P value2: comparison between 24 weeks of training and 12 weeks of training; P value3: comparison between after 24 weeks of training and before training.

3.3. FSS and LCQ Scale

Before training, the children were prone to fatigue and their qualities of life decreases. After 24 weeks of training, compared with those before training, the fatigue level of the children with bronchiectasis decreased, the FSS score significantly decreased (P = 0.0003), the LCQ score significantly increased (P = 0.0001), and the quality of life significantly improved (see Table 3).

3.4. Effect Size

The effect size of expiratory and inspiratory muscle-related indicators is shown in Tables 2 and 4, respectively. The effect size of lung function-related indicators is shown in Table 3.

4. Discussion

According to the results of this study, high-intensity respiratory muscle training significantly and effectively improved the lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and quality of life of children with bronchiectasis.

Previous studies have shown respiratory muscle weakness in patients with bronchiectasis [22, 23]. The average expiratory muscle strength in children with bronchiectasis in this study was 63.28 cm H₂O, while the average inspiratory muscle strength was 59.37 cm H₂O. The root cause is not yet clear, but the possible cause is functional weakness related to excessive inhalation [24]. Inflammation, excessive expansion, and airway obstruction can lead to impaired diaphragmatic function. During exercise, excessive inflation can lead to a sharp increase in the inspiratory threshold load, increase the respiratory work, and the ability of the inspiratory muscles to generate pressure also decreases [25–27], inhaling muscle weakness can significantly affect autonomous breathing [28]. The decrease in expiratory muscle strength can impair the effectiveness of coughing, reduce the expiratory flow rate, and reduce the discharge of respiratory secretions [29]. Previous studies have shown that respiratory muscle training can effectively improve the strength of the inspiratory and expiratory muscles [30, 31]. The results of this study showed that after 24 weeks of respiratory muscle training, the respiratory muscle strength of children was significantly increased compared to that before, with an increase of 21.05 cm H₂O (35%) in inspiratory muscle strength and 27.59 cm H₂O (44%) in expiratory muscle strength, and the peak expiratory flow rate was significantly increased as well, and the PEF value increased by 1.04 L/s (26%). Previously, studies have shown that adult patients with bronchiectasis, after 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training, experience a significant increase in inspiratory muscle strength by 21.4 cm H₂O [32]. The inspiratory muscles are both skeletal in shape and function, so when appropriate physiological loads are applied, their response to training is similar to that of any skeletal muscle [33]. After continuous training, the diaphragmatic muscle strength can be continuously enhanced [34, 35], generating greater strength driven by the respiratory muscles. An increase in expiratory muscle strength increases the expiratory flow rate, improves the cough ability, promotes the outwards movement of sputum, and reduces the adhesion of sputum [36]. The enhancement of the expiratory muscle strength can better activate the patient’s cough force [37].

Bronchiectasis severely damages the lung function [38]. Previous studies have shown that respiratory muscle training can improve FEV1 and FVC in COPD patients [39] and significantly improve FVC and total lung capacity (TLC) in CF patients with a training intensity of 80% MIP value [40], and COPD patients can generate greater inspiratory volume and faster respiratory flow rate after respiratory muscle training [41]. However, there is limited research on bronchiectasis. Before the start of this study, the lung function of the children was tested, and it was found that the main indicators of the lung function, such as FVC and FEV1, decreased to varying degrees. The average FEV1 was 1.72 L, and the average FVC was 2.31 L. Bronchiectasis can have varying degrees of small airway function involvement, with FEF25% of 3.08 L, FEF 50% of 1.55 L, FEF 75% of 0.59 L, and MMEF 75/25 of 1.27 L. Moreover, the recovery of the small airway function is more difficult [42]. After 24 weeks of respiratory muscle training, the children’s FVC and FEV1 significantly improved (FEV1 increased by 0.36 L (21%), FVC increased by 0.49 L (21%)), and their small airway function also improved significantly (FEF25 increased by 0.9 L (29%), FEF50% increased by 0.42L (27%), FEF75% increased by 0.36 L (61%), and MMEF75/25 increased by 0.44 L (35%)). Previous studies have shown that inspiratory muscle training can improve the lung function and respiratory muscle strength in children with bronchiectasis, and the results show significant improvement [43] in the lung function and inspiratory muscle strength in children with bronchiectasis after 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training. However, this study only focuses on inspiratory muscle training, which has certain limitations.

Ventilation restriction may lead to a decrease in exercise endurance and physical activity in patients with bronchiectasis. Patients with bronchiectasis may experience significant symptoms, such as exercise intolerance and fatigue [32], which have varying degrees of impact on their quality of life. Respiratory muscle training can improve exercise tolerance and prevent the progression of respiratory muscle fatigue [44]. Before and after training, the fatigue level of the children was scored using the FSS scale. Measure quality of life using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). The score ranges from 3 to 21 points, and the higher the score is, the smaller the impact of cough on quality of life. The questionnaire consists of three aspects: physical, psychological, and social [45]. The research results indicate that after respiratory muscle training, the FSS score decreased by 22.58 (43%) and the LCQ score increased by 6.84 (68%), indicating a significant improvement in fatigue and quality of life for the affected children. Previous studies have shown that after 3 months of chest physical therapy, the LCQ of patients with bronchiectasis has significantly improved, increasing by 1.3 [46].

The respiratory muscle training used this time was threshold incremental load training, which is one of the most widely used training methods. Children with bronchiectasis are highly adaptable to this training method and have no other side effects. Moreover, the trainer is connected to the device and can provide visual feedback, providing relevant respiratory information during respiratory muscle training. The training method can be presented in the form of games, improving the compliance and interest of children and facilitating data storage. In addition, the trainer is easy to carry and is also suitable for home training. This study was aimed to establish a long-term investigation to facilitate better long-term tracking of patient treatment outcomes. The research results indicate that respiratory muscle training can be included in the treatment plan for children with bronchiectasis. The advantage of threshold increasing load training is that it is relatively easy to adapt to gradually increasing resistance, higher pressure loads can be better tolerated, and the training effect is also significant. Previous studies have shown that increasing load training can increase inspiratory muscle strength by 44% [22].

This study also has certain limitations, such as the lack of a control group, the inclusion of few cases, and the fact that younger children may not be suitable for this plan. Further research will continue in the future, designing more comprehensive randomized controlled trials with a larger number of cases. In addition, in-depth research should be conducted on the mechanism of respiratory muscle training in children with bronchiectasis, such as respiratory mechanics. We made full use of instruments such as diaphragmatic ultrasound and diaphragmatic electromyography to more accurately study the changes in the diaphragm and related respiratory muscles.

5. Conclusion

Incremental load respiratory muscle training effectively improved the children’s lung function over the long term, improved the strength of their inspiratory and expiratory muscles, and improved their quality of life.

Additional Points

Clinical Messages. A 24-week long-term respiratory muscle training can effectively improve the lung function and respiratory muscle strength in children with bronchiectasis. Contribution of Paper. Improvement of pulmonary function is very important for children with bronchiectasis. Respiratory muscle training can not only improve the pulmonary function of children with bronchiectasis but also continuously improve the respiratory muscle strength.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan for their support, project no. 2019KY457.

Open Research

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

1 Koulouris N. G., Retsou S., Kosmas E., Dimakou K., Malagari K., Mantzikopoulos G., Koutsoukou A., Milic-Emili J., and Jordanoglou J., Tidal expiratory flow limitation, dyspnoea and exercise capacity in patients with bilateral bronchiectasis, European Respiratory Journal. (2003) 21, no. 5, 743–748, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00301103, 2-s2.0-0038394705.
10.1183/09031936.03.00301103
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2 Lin J. L., Xu J. F., and Qu J. M., Bronchiectasis in China, Annals of the American Thoracic Society. (2016) 13, no. 5, 609–616, https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201511-740ps, 2-s2.0-84989220924.
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-740PS
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Moran F., Piper A., Elborn J. S., and Bradley J. M., Respiratory muscle pressures in non-CF bronchiectasis: repeatability and reliability, Chronic Respiratory Disease. (2010) 7, no. 3, 165–171, https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972310375595, 2-s2.0-77955876433.
10.1177/1479972310375595
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
4 Ries A. L., Bauldoff G. S., Carlin B. W., Casaburi R., Emery C. F., Mahler D. A., Make B., Rochester C. L., Zuwallack R., and Herrerias C., Pulmonary rehabilitation: joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, Chest. (2007) 131, no. 5, 4s–42s, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2418, 2-s2.0-34248371116.
10.1378/chest.06-2418
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Arora N. S. and Gal T. J., Cough dynamics during progressive expiratory muscle weakness in healthy curarized subjects, Journal of Applied Physiology. (1981) 51, no. 2, 494–498, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1981.51.2.494.
10.1152/jappl.1981.51.2.494
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 O’Donnell A. E., Bronchiectasis update, Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. (2018) 31, no. 2, 194–198, https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000000445, 2-s2.0-85044229265.
10.1097/QCO.0000000000000445
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7 Decramer M., Lacquet L. M., Fagard R., and Rogiers P., Corticosteroids contribute to muscle weakness in chronic airflow obstruction, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. (1994) 150, no. 1, 11–16, https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025735, 2-s2.0-0028237807.
10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025735
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8 Cole P. J., Inflammation: a two-edged sword--the model of bronchiectasis, European Journal of Respiratory Diseases-Supplement. (1986) 147, 6–15.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
9 Kapur N., Masters I. B., and Chang A. B., Longitudinal growth and lung function in pediatric non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: what influences lung function stability?, Chest. (2010) 138, no. 1, 158–164, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2932, 2-s2.0-77954753599.
10.1378/chest.09-2932
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Laveneziana P., Albuquerque A., Aliverti A., Babb T., Barreiro E., Dres M., Dubé B. P., Fauroux B., Gea J., Guenette J. A., Hudson A. L., Kabitz H. J., Laghi F., Langer D., Luo Y. M., Neder J. A., O’Donnell D., Polkey M. I., Rabinovich R. A., Rossi A., Series F., Similowski T., Spengler C. M., Vogiatzis I., and Verges S., ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise, European Respiratory Journal. (2019) 53, no. 6, https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01214-2018, 2-s2.0-85059099616.
10.1183/13993003.01214-2018
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Lee A. L., Burge A. T., and Holland A. E., Positive expiratory pressure therapy versus other airway clearance techniques for bronchiectasis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2017) 9, no. 9, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011699.pub2, 2-s2.0-85029840291.
10.1002/14651858.cd011699.pub2
Google Scholar
12 Vorona S., Sabatini U., Al-Maqbali S., Bertoni M., Dres M., Bissett B., Van Haren F., Martin A. D., Urrea C., Brace D., Parotto M., Herridge M. S., Adhikari N. K. J., Fan E., Melo L. T., Reid W. D., Brochard L. J., Ferguson N. D., and Goligher E. C., Inspiratory muscle rehabilitation in critically ill adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis, Annals of the American Thoracic Society. (2018) 15, no. 6, 735–744, https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201712-961oc, 2-s2.0-85048107050.
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201712-961OC
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 T Hill A., L Sullivan A., D Chalmers J., De Soyza A., Stuart Elborn J., Andres Floto R., Grillo L., Gruffydd-Jones K., Harvey A., S Haworth C., Hiscocks E., R Hurst J., Johnson C., Peter Kelleher W., Bedi P., Payne K., Saleh H., J Screaton N., Smith M., Tunney M., Whitters D., Wilson R., and R Loebinger M., British thoracic society guideline for bronchiectasis in adults, Thorax. (2019) 74, no. Suppl 1, 1–69, https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212463, 2-s2.0-85058765727.
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212463
Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 Gosselink R., De Vos J., van den Heuvel S. P., Segers J., Decramer M., and Kwakkel G., Impact of inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD: what is the evidence?, European Respiratory Journal. (2011) 37, no. 2, 416–425, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00031810, 2-s2.0-79953660603.
10.1183/09031936.00031810
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Charususin N., Gosselink R., Decramer M., Demeyer H., McConnell A., Saey D., Maltais F., Derom E., Vermeersch S., Heijdra Y. F., van Helvoort H., Garms L., Schneeberger T., Kenn K., Gloeckl R., and Langer D., Randomised controlled trial of adjunctive inspiratory muscle training for patients with COPD, Thorax. (2018) 73, no. 10, 942–950, https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211417, 2-s2.0-85048865332.
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211417
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Mador M. J., Deniz O., Aggarwal A., Shaffer M., Kufel T. J., and Spengler C. M., Effect of respiratory muscle endurance training in patients with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitatio, Chest. (2005) 128, no. 3, 1216–1224, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.3.1216, 2-s2.0-24944584632.
10.1378/chest.128.3.1216
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Illi S. K., Held U., Frank I., and Spengler C. M., Effect of respiratory muscle training on exercise performance in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Sports Medicine. (2012) 42, no. 8, 707–724, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03262290.
10.1007/BF03262290
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Spruit M. A., Singh S. J., Garvey C., ZuWallack R., Nici L., Rochester C., Hill K., Holland A. E., Lareau S. C., Man W. D., Pitta F., Sewell L., Raskin J., Bourbeau J., Crouch R., Franssen F. M., Casaburi R., Vercoulen J. H., Vogiatzis I., Gosselink R., Clini E. M., Effing T. W., Maltais F., van der Palen J., Troosters T., Janssen D. J., Collins E., Garcia-Aymerich J., Brooks D., Fahy B. F., Puhan M. A., Hoogendoorn M., Garrod R., Schols A. M., Carlin B., Benzo R., Meek P., Morgan M., Rutten-van Mölken M. P., Ries A. L., Make B., Goldstein R. S., Dowson C. A., Brozek J. L., Donner C. F., and Wouters E. F., An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. (2013) 188, no. 8, e13–e64, https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201309-1634st, 2-s2.0-84886418056.
10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Wang H., Ji X. B., Li C. W., Lu H. W., Mao B., Liang S., Cheng K. B., Bai J. W., Martinez-Garcia M. A., and Xu J. F., Clinical characteristics and validation of bronchiectasis severity score systems for post-tuberculosis bronchiectasis, The clinical respiratory journal. (2018) 12, no. 8, 2346–2353, https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12911, 2-s2.0-85051269633.
10.1111/crj.12911
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Muñoz G., Buxó M., de Gracia J., Olveira C., Martinez-Garcia M. A., Giron R., Polverino E., Alvarez A., Birring S. S., and Vendrell M., Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, Chronic Respiratory Disease. (2016) 13, no. 2, 128–136, https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972316632005, 2-s2.0-84966664005.
10.1177/1479972316632005
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21 Lee J. H., Lee W. Y., Yong S. J., Kim W. J., Sin S., Lee C. Y., Kim Y., Jung J. Y., Kim S. H., Oh Y. M., Lee H., Choi H., Sim Y. S., Yoo K. H., Lee S. J., Kim T. H., Yang B., Jeong I., Um S. J., Kim D. K., Lee J. H., Kwon B. S., Cho Y. J., Lee C. H., Rhee C. K., Lee S. H., Na J. O., Jang A. S., Kim C., Kim H. K., Park H. Y., Lee J. S., Lee S. W., Ra S. W., Kang S. Y., Kim Y. H., Park Y. B., Park S. Y., Kim J., Yoon Y. S., Jeong Y. J., Lee J. K., Kim K. U., Lee H. K., Kim E. K., Lee S. H., Choi J. S., Kang H. K., Kwon Y. S., and Lee J. H., Prevalence of depression and its associated factors in bronchiectasis: findings from KMBARC registry, BMC Pulmonary Medicine. (2021) 21, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01675-4.
10.1186/s12890-021-01675-4
Web of Science® Google Scholar
22 Ozalp O., Inal-Ince D., Cakmak A., Calik-Kutukcu E., Saglam M., Savci S., Vardar-Yagli N., Arikan H., Karakaya J., and Coplu L., High-intensity inspiratory muscle training in bronchiectasis: a randomized controlled trial, Respirology. (2019) 24, no. 3, 246–253, https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13397, 2-s2.0-85053420040.
10.1111/resp.13397
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23 Liaw M. Y., Wang Y. H., Tsai Y. C., Huang K. T., Chang P. W., Chen Y. C., and Lin M. C., Inspiratory muscle training in bronchiectasis patients: a prospective randomized controlled study, Clinical Rehabilitation. (2011) 25, no. 6, 524–536, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510391682, 2-s2.0-80052615337.
10.1177/0269215510391682
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24 O’Shea S. D., Taylor N. F., and Paratz J., Peripheral muscle strength training in COPD: a systematic review, Chest. (2004) 126, no. 3, 903–914, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.3.903, 2-s2.0-4544242785.
10.1378/chest.126.3.903
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25 Decramer M., Effects of hyperinflation on the respiratory muscles, European Respiratory Journal. (1989) 2, no. 4, 299–302, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.93.02040299.
10.1183/09031936.93.02040299
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26 Leblanc P., Summers E., Inman M. D., Jones N. L., Campbell E. J., and Killian K. J., Inspiratory muscles during exercise: a problem of supply and demand, Journal of Applied Physiology. (1988) 64, no. 6, 2482–2489, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1988.64.6.2482.
10.1152/jappl.1988.64.6.2482
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27 Loring S. H., Garcia-Jacques M., and Malhotra A., Pulmonary characteristics in COPD and mechanisms of increased work of breathing, Journal of Applied Physiology. (2009) 107, no. 1, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2009, 2-s2.0-67650045511.
10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2009
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28 Van Hollebeke M., Poddighe D., Clerckx B., Muller J., Hermans G., Gosselink R., Langer D., and Louvaris Z., High-intensity inspiratory muscle training improves scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscle oxygenation parameters in patients with weaning difficulties: a randomized controlled trial, Frontiers in Physiology. (2022) 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.786575.
10.3389/fphys.2022.786575
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
29 McCreery J. L., Mackintosh K. A., Mills-Bennett R., and McNarry M. A., The effect of a high-intensity PrO2Fit inspiratory muscle training intervention on physiological and psychological health in adults with bronchiectasis: a mixed-methods study, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. (2021) 18, no. 6, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063051.
10.3390/ijerph18063051
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
30 Charususin N., Dacha S., Gosselink R., Decramer M., Von Leupoldt A., Reijnders T., Louvaris Z., and Langer D., Respiratory muscle function and exercise limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review, Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. (2018) 12, no. 1, 67–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2018.1398084, 2-s2.0-85038223568.
10.1080/17476348.2018.1398084
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31 Emirza C., Aslan G. K., Kilinc A. A., and Cokugras H., Effect of expiratory muscle training on peak cough flow in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a randomized controlled trial, Pediatric Pulmonology. (2021) 56, no. 5, 939–947, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25259.
10.1002/ppul.25259
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
32 Newall C., Stockley R. A., and Hill S. L., Exercise training and inspiratory muscle training in patients with bronchiectasis, Thorax. (2005) 60, no. 11, 943–948, https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.028928, 2-s2.0-27744446821.
10.1136/thx.2004.028928
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33 Kraemer W. J., Adams K., Cafarelli E., Dudley G. A., Dooly C., Feigenbaum M. S., Fleck S. J., Franklin B., Fry A. C., Hoffman J. R., Newton R. U., Potteiger J., Stone M. H., Ratamess N. A., and Triplett-McBride T., American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. (2002) 34, no. 2, 364–380, https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027, 2-s2.0-0036163182.
10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
34 Silva I. S., Fregonezi G. A., Dias F. A., Ribeiro C. T., Guerra R. O., and Ferreira G. M., Inspiratory muscle training for asthma, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2013) 2013, no. 9, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003792.pub2, 2-s2.0-84898727581.
10.1002/14651858.cd003792.pub2
Google Scholar
35 Rodrigues A., Louvaris Z., Dacha S., Janssens W., Pitta F., Vogiatzis I., Gosselink R., and Langer D., Differences in respiratory muscle responses to hyperpnea or loaded breathing in COPD, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. (2020) 52, no. 5, 1126–1134, https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002222.
10.1249/MSS.0000000000002222
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36 Menezes K. K., Nascimento L. R., Ada L., Polese J. C., Avelino P. R., and Teixeira-Salmela L. F., Respiratory muscle training increases respiratory muscle strength and reduces respiratory complications after stroke: a systematic review, Journal of Physiotherapy. (2016) 62, no. 3, 138–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.05.014, 2-s2.0-84976545342.
10.1016/j.jphys.2016.05.014
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
37 Bolser D. C., Reier P. J., and Davenport P. W., Responses of the anterolateral abdominal muscles during cough and expiratory threshold loading in the cat, Journal of Applied Physiology. (2000) 88, no. 4, 1207–1214, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1207.
10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1207
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
38 Chang A. B., Bush A., and Grimwood K., Bronchiectasis in children: diagnosis and treatment, The Lancet. (2018) 392, no. 10150, 866–879, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31554-x, 2-s2.0-85052897003.
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31554-X
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
39 Beaumont M., Mialon P., Ber-Moy C. L., Lochon C., Péran L., Pichon R., Gut-Gobert C., Leroyer C., Morelot-Panzini C., and Couturaud F., Inspiratory muscle training during pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial, Chronic Respiratory Disease. (2015) 12, no. 4, 305–312, https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972315594625, 2-s2.0-84944053850.
10.1177/1479972315594625
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
40 Enright S., Chatham K., Ionescu A. A., Unnithan V. B., and Shale D. J., Inspiratory muscle training improves lung function and exercise capacity in adults with cystic fibrosis, Chest. (2004) 126, no. 2, 405–411, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.2.405, 2-s2.0-4143065844.
10.1378/chest.126.2.405
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
41 Langer D., Ciavaglia C., Faisal A., Webb K. A., Neder J. A., Gosselink R., Dacha S., Topalovic M., Ivanova A., and O’Donnell D. E., Inspiratory muscle training reduces diaphragm activation and dyspnea during exercise in COPD, Journal of Applied Physiology. (2018) 125, no. 2, 381–392, https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01078.2017, 2-s2.0-85052865304.
10.1152/japplphysiol.01078.2017
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
42 Guan W. J., Yuan J. J., Gao Y. H., Li H. M., Zheng J. P., Chen R. C., and Zhong N. S., Impulse oscillometry and spirometry small-airway parameters in mild to moderate bronchiectasis, Respiratory Care. (2016) 61, no. 11, 1513–1522, https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04710, 2-s2.0-84994104643.
10.4187/respcare.04710
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
43 Gurses H. N., Ayhan B., Demir R., and Ozyilmaz S., The effects of inspiratory muscle training on respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary functions in children with bronchiectasis, European Respiratory Journal. (2013) 42, no. 57.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
44 Shei R. J., Paris H. L., Wilhite D. P., Chapman R. F., and Mickleborough T. D., The role of inspiratory muscle training in the management of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, The Physician and Sportsmedicine. (2016) 44, no. 4, 327–334, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2016.1176546, 2-s2.0-84973904653.
10.1080/00913847.2016.1176546
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
45 Kalpaklioglu A. F., Kara T., Kurtipek E., Kocyigit P., Ekici A., and Ekici M., Evaluation and impact of chronic cough: comparison of specific vs generic quality-of-life questionnaires, Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. (2005) 94, no. 5, 581–585, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61137-4, 2-s2.0-19044366481.
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61137-4
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
46 Murray M. P., Pentland J. L., and Hill A. T., A randomised crossover trial of chest physiotherapy in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, European Respiratory Journal. (2009) 34, no. 5, 1086–1092, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00055509, 2-s2.0-71049161817.
10.1183/09031936.00055509
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

All articles

Incremental Load Respiratory Muscle Training Improves Respiratory Muscle Strength and Pulmonary Function in Children with Bronchiectasis

Abstract

1. Introduction