Volume 2024, Issue 1 2959770
Research Article
Open Access

Analysis of a Data-Driven Vector-Borne Dengue Transmission Model for a Tropical Environment in Bangladesh

Mahadee Al Mobin

Mahadee Al Mobin

Department of Mathematics , University of Dhaka , Dhaka , 1000 , Bangladesh , du.ac.bd

Research Wing , Bangladesh Institute of Governance and Management , Dhaka , 1207 , Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
Md. Kamrujjaman

Corresponding Author

Md. Kamrujjaman

Department of Mathematics , University of Dhaka , Dhaka , 1000 , Bangladesh , du.ac.bd

Search for more papers by this author
Md. Mamun Molla

Md. Mamun Molla

Department of Mathematics and Physics , North South University , Dhaka , 1229 , Bangladesh , northsouth.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Shi Chen

Shi Chen

Department of Public Health Sciences , University of North Carolina at Charlotte , Charlotte , North Carolina, USA , uncc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 November 2024
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Jaume Giné

Abstract

Dengue is the most prominent arboviral infection known to humans, especially in tropical regions of the world like Bangladesh. This is often a tricky outbreak to deal with, given its nature of seasonality, and due to the impact of climate change, variations in the length of its on-season have been observed. This article models the dengue scenario in Bangladesh using a periodic, nonautonomous SIS vector–host model, proposes some development over the existing algorithm to determine the basic reproduction number, R0, for nonautonomous models, namely the “linear operator method,” and hence patriots the behavior of R0 with respect to the length of the on-season. Our experimentation shows that the infection transmission will be at its peak when the length of the on-season is around 10 months. Based on the data of 2022, the current dynamic of the disease scenario in Bangladesh shows that the disease will not persist in the long run but occasional outbreaks may occur, given the right set of conditions. Finally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis of the model parameters, which shows that improving the recovery rate of the infected patient class and impeding the birth rate of the vector can effectively subdue the disease outbreak.

1. Introduction

Dengue fever is a virus-induced illness spread by mosquitoes rapidly in the tropical and subtropical regions throughout the globe in recent years. Female mosquitoes, mostly Aedes aegypti and, to a lesser degree, Aedes albopictus, transmit the dengue virus [1]. The risk levels of dengue fluctuate depending on rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, and unplanned rapid urbanization throughout the tropics [2]. Dengue fever is triggered by a virus belonging to the family Flaviviridae. The four distinct virus serotypes of dengue are DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4 [1]. After recovering from an infection, it is believed that one will be impervious to that serotype for the remainder of their life. Cross-immunity to varying serotypes is insignificant [3]. Subsequent infections (secondary infections) with various serotypes increase the likelihood of severe dengue [4].

During the early outbreaks between 2000 and 2002, DENV-3 was identified as the predominant serotype although all four dengue serotypes were present [5]. Subsequently, there was a lack of data on serotype circulation until 2012. Reference [6] later demonstrated that DENV-1 and DENV-2 were the dominant serotypes circulating from 2013 to 2016. In 2017, DENV-3 reemerged after a period of dormancy, with DENV-2 remaining the most prevalent serotype. Since the major outbreak in 2019, DENV-3 has been the most frequently detected serotype. There is limited information on the genotypic diversity of dengue viruses, but three genotypes (I, II, and III) of DENV-3 and the cosmopolitan genotype of DENV-2 are currently found in Bangladesh [5]. The potential reemergence of the DENV-4 serotype, which has not been reported for over 2 decades, could present a significant public health risk in Bangladesh due to the possibility of secondary infections [5].

DENV-positive individuals are capable of infecting mosquitoes. This can include individuals with asymptomatic dengue infection, those who have not yet developed a symptomatic infection (presymptomatic), and healthy individuals (asymptomatic) [1]. Human-to-mosquito transmission can occur up to 2 days before the onset of symptoms [1, 711] and up to 2 days after the fever has gone away [12]. High viremia and fever in the patient are linked to a higher chance of mosquito infection; on the other hand, increased DENV antibodies are linked to lower chances of infection [12]. The majority of patients are viremic for 4–5 days although viremia can persist up to 12 days [13]. Mosquito vectors are the major route of transmission of DENV between people. There is evidence, however, that maternal transmission during pregnancy is possible. The vertical transmission of the disease despite its low risk is correlated with the timing of dengue infection during pregnancy. An infected mother [1418] may give birth to a premature baby or an underweight baby or may have fetal distress [19].

One of the prime objectives of epidemic modeling is to devise ways to eliminate the disease. A fundamental principle of epidemiological modeling is that most models exhibit the threshold behavior of Ross, Kermack, and McKendrick, which asserts that a specific set of parameters dictates if an illness can infect and survive [20]. For this threshold, Diekmann in 1990 provided a fundamental biological concept that is still commonly used today [21]. The estimated number of secondary cases that a typical sick person will cause throughout a pathogen’s whole duration of infectiousness in a population that is susceptible was characterized as the pathogen’s basic reproductive number (BRN), which is commonly denoted by R0 [21, 22]. It is advantageous to have an equation for R0 since the BRN can provide information regarding epidemic outbreaks. This enables one to see how an individual model parameter can affect R0 and what modifications one would need to make to stop an epidemic. R0 offers additional information in addition to explaining this threshold behavior. The BRN can be utilized to figure out the volume of the susceptible population that has to be vaccinated in order to avoid an outbreak. In basic modeling techniques, for example, the illness can be eradicated by vaccinating 1 − 1/R0 of the population [20, 23]. This provides public health authorities with a helpful tool for determining annual vaccination production for diseases such as influenza. A standard R0 conclusion for vector-borne diseases is that the vector population must be divided by to eradicate the disease [24]. , where is the mean age of infection and is the mean life expectancy for models with exponential age distribution [25]. As a result, R0 may be utilized for more than simply determining the duration of an outbreak; it can also assist health professionals in relating crucial epidemiological quantities.

Dengue fever incidence varies with season, with the timing and size of seasonal peaks varying from year to year. These variations are driven by climate change and the associated variation in mosquito populations, as well as interannual fluctuation in DENV activity. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus lay their eggs in containers that are filled with premonsoon rain in May, which causes an increase in the mosquito population. After the rainy season ends in September, mosquito numbers progressively decline. During the monsoon, the mean monthly temperature is almost always in a range that is conducive to mosquito growth and DENV transmission. National surveillance data typically show a rise in the incidence beginning in June and peaking in August, followed by a steady decrease, as depicted in Figures 1 and 2 [26]. The dengue scenario for the year 2022 is presented in Figure 3.

Details are in the caption following the image
The monthly distribution of dengue fever cases from 2010 to 2021 except 2019 in Bangladesh exhibits the rise in dengue cases beginning in June and peaking in August, followed by a steady decrease.
Details are in the caption following the image
The monthly distribution of dengue fever cases of 2019 in Bangladesh exhibits the rise in dengue cases beginning in June and peaking in August, followed by a steady decrease.
Details are in the caption following the image
Heat map of dengue infection in Bangladesh during 2022.

A close-up view of Figures 1 and 2 is included in Appendix A as Figures A1 and A2.

To simplify the model, some models with seasonal illnesses will only include one season at a time, essentially eliminating the seasonality element [27]. As seasonality plays a crucial role in the population dynamics of the disease, it must be accounted for in a model for a better study of the case. The incorporation of the seasonality can be accomplished in several ways. Forced oscillators are used in several modeling techniques to depict a wide variety of dynamics [27]. Making the transmission parameter periodic in time is the easiest approach to examining seasonality in models [2830]. Other characteristics, such as birth or death rates for animals with mating seasons, can likewise be made periodic. This is not to suggest that seasonal forcing is suitable in every situation; in fact, applying this can render a model more complex and hard [27].

This paper aims to model the dengue scenario in Bangladesh using a nonautonomous, periodic, SIS vector–host model. To analyze the R0 of this nonautonomous model, we propose some improvements over the existing linear operator method. We conduct a sensitivity analysis of the parameters considered for the models to determine the most prominent parameters to control disease dynamics for times to come.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Bangladesh, situated near the mouth of the Bay of Bengal (Figure 4), encompasses a significant portion of the Bengal Delta, which has been shaped by the sediment deposition from the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna (GBM) river system [32]. The GBM rivers carry the largest sediment load globally, primarily sourced from the Himalayan and Indo-Burman mountains [33], and they contribute to the fourth-highest volume of water discharge to the ocean [34]. The geographical coordinates of Bangladesh range from 20°34N to 26°38N and 88°01E to 92°41E [35].

Details are in the caption following the image
Köppen–Geiger climate classification of Bangladesh’s climatic zone [31].

Bangladesh, located along the Tropic of Cancer, experiences a humid tropical/subtropical climate characterized by moderately warm temperatures, high humidity, and significant seasonal variations in rainfall patterns [36]. According to the Köppen–Geiger climate classification [31], the country encompasses three climate zones: temperate with a dry winter and hot summer (Cwa; Zone 1; Figure 4), tropical monsoon (Am; Zone 2), and tropical savannah (Aw; Zone 3). Annual rainfall averages 2300 mm, ranging from 1500 mm in the west to over 4000 mm in the northeast [37]. The mean temperature varies from 18°C to 22°C in winter and 23°C to 30°C in summer. Climate models predict a temperature increase of 2.4°C and a 9.7% increase in rainfall in Bangladesh by the end of the 21st century [38].

The population of Bangladesh as of 2022 is 171,186,372 [39]. A high-resolution demographic density map of the country is presented in Figure 5. The figure clearly exhibits the highest population density around the country’s capital city, Dhaka (the yellow-lit part in the middle of the country), followed by the port city of the country, Chattorgram (the yellow-lit part at the southeastern end of the country), and finally clusters around the different cities of the country. The population density slowly diminishes as we move away from the cities of the country. Dengue is a disease that often thrives in densely populated urban and tropical settings. Such has also been seen in the case of the heat map of the number of reported cases of dengue in 2022, as exhibited in Figure 3. Each of the polygons in the heat map represents each division (first of order of administrative level in the country) of Bangladesh. The heat map also shows that the intensity of DENV is higher in densely populated, highly urbanized regions in comparison to its sparsely populated, suburban counterparts.

Details are in the caption following the image
Demographic density map of Bangladesh for the year 2022.

Dengue has been a problem for Bangladesh since the beginning of this century, as illustrated in Figure 6. The problem was much more in control till the first decade. Due to higher technological advancements, rapid urbanization and industrialization, filling up of water bodies, and most importantly climate change, the problem has begun to move out of hand and the country has seen the horrid face of the problem in 2019 where the number of reported cases has gone over 50,000, which has been the maximum in the last 2 decades. The problem shows an upward trend, and the incident of 2019 may only be a glimpse of the problem this disease can pose in the upcoming decade.

Details are in the caption following the image
The annual dengue fever reported cases and deaths in Bangladesh (2000–2022). It shows that dengue cases were on the fall from 2000–2006; it was almost null from 2006–2010 and showed an increasing trend from 2010 onward.

2.2. Data

The dengue data used in this paper were collected from annual reports and releases of the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) and the Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR). The population-based data of Bangladesh were collected from the World Bank data repository. The population density data were collected from Ref. [40].

2.3. Formulation of the Vector–Host Model

We wanted to exhibit the proposed linear operator model; hence, we have chosen a basic model to simulate the outcomes of the model as increased complexity in the model architecture can correlate with the increased symbolic computational complexity of the linear operator method.

Mathematical models are generally formulated based on some assumptions. The model considered here is a variation of the Ross 1911 second malaria model. The assumptions to formulate the model are as follows:
  • 1.

    Two heterogeneous classes of the population are considered in the model. One is of the vector, and the other is of the host. Each of the classes is partitioned into two subclasses: susceptible and infected.

  • 2.

    A susceptible host can only be infected by the infected vector and vice versa.

  • 3.

    Total host population (Nh) and total vector population (Nv) are considered constant.

  • 4.

    The vector and host population is nonimmune to the disease.

The following system of nonlinear, nonautonomous differential equations may be used to characterize the dynamics of this infectious disease in both host and vector populations:
()

Here, prime ′ denotes the derivative with respect to the temporal variable, t. The parameter’s definition and values are discussed in Table 1. The flowchart of Model (1) is displayed in Figure 7.

Table 1. Parameter values are estimated from the mentioned data source.
Parameters Definition Values Reference
ah Off-season infection rate (host) 1.01396 Estimated
bh Peak season infection rate (host) 9.05282 Estimated
av Off-season infection rate (vector) 0.7875 Estimated
bv Peak season infection rate (vector) 2.3625 Estimated
ζ Recovery rate of host [0, 1] Estimated
τ Length of peak season 5 [26]
ω Length of each season 12 [26]
αh Gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate (host) [0, 0.0083] [41]
αv Gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate (vector) [0, 2.459] [42]
p Vector-to-host ratio [0, 0.0055] [42]
  • These are used to generate figures of the simulations.
Details are in the caption following the image
Flow diagram of (1).
Equation (1) has a feasibility region of (the positive orthant of ), and the system is well-posed. In order to normalize System (1), consider the following transformation: sh = Sh/Nh, sv = Sv/Nv, ih = Ih/Nh, iv = Iv/Nv, and p = Nv/Nh. Misusing the notations, Sh, Sv, Ih, and Iv we are left with
()
Here,
  • ζ denotes the recovery rate of the infected host.

  • αh and αv denote the birth rate or per capita natural mortality rate for the host and vector, respectively,

    ()

  • denotes the rate at which susceptible hosts are infected by the vector.

    ()
    denotes the rate at which susceptible vectors are infected by the host.

Clearly from the above definition we can say that both ηh(t) and ηv(t) are the square wave function of periodicity ω, where τ is the length of each season.

2.4. Basic Reproduction Number Using Linear Operation Method

In several types of epidemiological models, the BRN has been determined by linking epidemic threshold R0 < 1 (allowing for numerous choices of R0) with local stability requirement for disease-free equilibrium (DFE). An ordeal in this scenario is to quantitatively describe R0 in diverse populations [43]. Because of the complicated transmission cycles being represented, a canonical R0 was required. Because of the diverse range of transmission pathways between the host and vector in vector-borne illnesses, the infection volume should be averaged in some way: New infections must be examined on a generational basis [44]. By creating next-generation techniques, Diekmann, Heesterbeek, and Metz in 1990 [21] and subsequently, van den Driessche and Watmough in 2002 [45] were able to overcome this problem. R0 was mathematically defined by Ref. [21] as the positive linear operator’s dominant eigenvalue, while Ref. [45] further pushed down the works of Ref. [21] detailing a method for generalized heterogeneous populations, a compartmental disease transmission model. The (i, k) item in the next-generation matrix represents the predicted number of new infections in the ith compartment induced by the sick individual of the kth compartment upon initial introduction. R0 (the next-generation matrix’s spectral radius) is obtained from an equation that is derived for this matrix. R0, as defined by Ref. [21], is used in several models for assessing the situation of a disease infecting a population. The next-generation method gives the required mean of overall compartments. These approaches, on the other hand, were developed for uniquely autonomous systems, whereas no generalization in the case of nonautonomous periodic models was developed. This method has been extensively used in many research studies [28, 4648] to date and has been a go to determine the BRN of the autonomous system. Because R0 relies on the transmission coefficient, which in the case of most models is time-variant, seasonality can have a significant impact on R0 [49]. Some researchers have utilized time averages, which are straightforward to construct and result in R0 closed-form expressions that are easy to understand. Bacaër et al. [24, 50, 51] devised an approach using linear operators that generalizes to broader collections of periodic models at the cost of harder implementation and, mostly, prohibits deriving closed-form expressions that assist interpretation, as described in a series of publications. Despite the follow-up work [52], there were no clear protocols for applying the latter strategy. Other techniques for discrete-time periodic systems have been developed [51]. A theory for compartmental time-delayed periodic population models was recently proposed [53]. Works done on Ref. [27] give the latest development on the method that deploys a poor refinement strategy to develop the value of the BRN to converge. This article aims to propose an improved refinement technique to tackle this issue.

2.4.1. Condition of Existence and Well-Posedness

A paper by Bacaër and Guernaoui [24] proposed a method for computing the R0 of a model depicting the cutaneous leishmaniasis deploying approach that carries on the idea of the linear operator method initially defined by Ref. [21] by incorporating the next-generation operator method on periodic autonomous systems [45]. They demonstrated that this R0 had threshold behavior as that of the model. Unfortunately, they were unable to provide a method for calculating it. A theory proposed by Ref. [52] of the BRN for a broad class of periodic compartmental models extends the works of Ref. [45] and mimics Bacaër’s technique. Works done on Ref. [27] provide the most recent advancement in the approach, which has covered the theoretical element of the method, but the algorithmic portion has scopes for improvement.

The setup created for autonomous models, in which a population of heterogeneous nature is divided into n homogeneous compartments, is formulated to the scenario in which some parameters are ω-periodic in this technique. The system must fulfill some hypotheses that ensure the well-posedness of the model and suit the epidemiological environment in which the BRN is developed, just like the next-generation method for autonomous systems [45, 54]. Assume for each xi ≥ 0 depicts the state of individuals in each of the n compartments. The first m compartments indicate the infected classes, and the rest are uninfected (i.e., the infected and uninfected compartments are enumerated by i = 1, 2, 3, …, m and i = m + 1, m + 2, m + 3, …, n, respectively). indicates the set of all disease-free states (including equilibria and any disease-free periodic solutions); represents the ith compartment recruitment rate of newly infected individuals, represents the rate of persons entering via other ways, and represents the outflow rate of the ith compartment; thus, denotes the net flux of individuals by other means in the ith compartment resulting in the following model:
()

The necessary assumptions use this notation to expand Van’s requirements while also incorporating two additional assumptions to handle periodicity:

Assumption 1. , and are continuously differentiable with respect to x, continuous on and nonnegative.

Assumption 2. . .

Assumption 3. if i > m.

Assumption 4. If , then .

Assumption 5. such that for each , the functions , , , and are periodic functions on the variable t with ω-periodicity.

Assumption 6. A disease-free periodic solution x0(t) of the model exists that is linearly asymptotically stable in .

Assumption 7. If no additional infections emerge, the infection will finally die off.

The following can be comprehended intuitively:
  • Assumption 1 simply states the nonnegative directed flow of populous among compartments.

  • Assumption 2 implies the fact that empty compartments do not contribute to the flow of individuals.

  • Assumption 3 simply states that the incidence of infection for uninfected compartments is zero.

  • Assumption 4 imposes that the population will be unscathed by the disease if it is disease-free initially.

  • Assumption 5 illustrates the seasonality-induced periodicity of the infection.

  • In the case of Assumption 6, let x0(t) be a disease-free solution of (5) such that . Let ,

    ()

  • be a (n-m) × (n-m) matrix, and is linearly asymptotically stable (i.e., ).

  • In the case of Assumption 7, by the argument posed in Lemma 1 of Ref. [45] (mentioned in Appendix C),

()
where and are m × m matrices defined as
()
respectively, and J(t) is a (nm) × n matrix. is nonnegative, and is cooperative (i.e., its off-diagonal elements are also nonnegative). Let be the linear omega-periodic system’s evolution operator,
()
That is, for each , the m × m matrix satisfies
()
where I is an identity matrix of order m. Thus, the monodromy matrix of (10) equals . Be aware that individuals within infectious compartments are evolving improperly and exponentially due to extrinsic causes, such as natural mortality and disease-induced death. Hence, we consider that .

A brief on the theoretical development of the linear operator method is provided in Appendix B. R0 is then computed as λ such that from the standpoint of a different monodromy matrix. For autonomous systems, the resultant R0 has been shown to reflect the disease-free solution’s asymptotic stability [27, 52, 55]. However, in many situations, analytical determination of the monodromy matrix is impossible. Numerical schemes are required to determine R0 for such instances; the improved algorithm is outlined in the next section.

2.4.2. Linear Operator Method

Consider the linear ω -periodic equation,
()
which is a modification over (5) with the introduction of the parameter λ ∈ (0, ). Because the above problems are generally impossible to solve by hand, numerical schemes must be employed to calculate the BRN. Generally, using the linear operator technique, a closed-form expression for any BRN cannot be determined; therefore, numerical work is required. A fundamental matrix must be found, which implies that n linearly independent solutions must be found for an n-dimensional system. Thus, each of the initial conditions must be linearly independent of the others. The simplest approach deploys each initial condition essentially as a unit vector of a standard basis of the proper dimension. Such consideration ensures that the solutions are linearly independent, at least algebraically, and turns the resultant fundamental matrix into a principal fundamental matrix, simplifying the computation of associated monodromy matrices. The procedure to determine such is as follows:
  • Formation of monodromy matrix:

    • 1.

      Solve the n-dimensional system numerically in the interval [0, ω] with ith standard basis as the initial condition to attain the solution ai(t).

    • 2.

      Determine the principal fundamental matrix ψA(t) = [a1(t), a2(t), …, an(t)].

    • 3.

      Define the monodromy matrix ϕA(t) = ψA(ω).

  • Determining λ by refinement of brackets:

    • 1.

      Define tolerance ϵ, parameter values, and initial guess λ0 for R0.

    • 2.

      Define .

    • 3.

      If ρ0 < 1, then define λu = λ0 and decrease the value λu with a small step size δ up to λl such that ; otherwise, λl = λ0 and increase the value λl with a small step size δ up to λu such that .

    • 4.

      While |λuλl| > ϵ, define an intermediate value λk using the bisection method or the other bracket refinement method under the condition if , define λl = λk; otherwise, λu = λk.

The algorithm shall be demonstrated in the vector–host system (1) in the following section.

3. Numerical Simulation and Results

To execute the linear operator method on a system, it must satisfy the assumptions mentioned in Section 2.4.1. The verification of Assumptions 1 to 5 readily holds from the construction of the vectors . For the validation of Assumption 6, we consider the DFE (0,  0, Nv, Nh). Thus,
()
Thus, solving the system provides us with the principal fundamental matrix that generates the monodromy matrix,
()

This evidently satisfies Assumption 6.

In the case of Assumption 7, we have the system
()
Thus, solving the aforesaid system provides us with the principal fundamental matrix that generates the monodromy matrix,
()

This evidently satisfies Assumption 7.

3.1. Algebraic Calculations for the Vector–Host Model

Consider the ω-periodic modification of System (2) with λ parameters such that λ ∈ (0, ),
()
According to the definition of ηh(t), ηv(t) in (3) and (4), we proceed with the calculation in two separate intervals.
  • 0 ≤ t < τ:

  • System (16) boils down to

    ()

  • which has the eigenvalues

()
Since all the parameters and variables on the L.H.S of the aforesaid equation are positive, r1,2 > 0∀ λ ∈ (0, ). Hence, the fundamental matrix becomes
()
Following a similar procedure from the interval τtω, we get
()
with the eigenvalues
()
generating the fundamental matrix
()
Thus combining the definition of the two separate intervals, we can generalize the fundamental matrix over the interval 0 ≤ t < ω as
()
From this, we can get the monodromy matrix,
()

It is difficult to write the function directly since the ultimate result is obtained by multiplying the matrices of each element of the solution throughout the entire interval. The main challenge is determining the monodromy matrix ’s spectral radius. The computation of spectral radius is much more difficult since the eigenvalues for this matrix are complex formulas. However, when calculating the initial approximation of the spectral radius, denoted as λ0, where , the resulting equation is often transcendental and therefore must be solved numerically.

3.2. Parameter Estimation

In order to simulate the dengue scenario in Bangladesh using the model proposed in equation (2), we need to determine the values of the model parameter as per the scenario at hand. Values of τ, ω, αh, αv, and p are readily adopted from the prevalent literature. To estimate the values of the remaining parameters, we used the least square method whose methodological description can be found in Ref. [56]. The empirical number of reported cases on a month m, denoted as , and the number of incidences predicted by the model on month m, denoted as , are compared using the scaling parameter α introduced by Ref. [57]. The sum of squares error is then calculated as follows:
()

The parameter space is uniformly sampled utilizing the Latin hypercube sampling method [58] to produce parameter combinations. The detailed descriptions of the parameters and the corresponding Latin hypercube sampling ranges are presented in Table 1. Subsequently, we computed the sum of squares score using (25) for each parameter set over a simulation run. Following this, we employed the MATLAB GlobalSearch algorithm to identify the optimal parameter combinations by focusing on the parameter sets that yielded the minimum sum of squares values. To tackle the stochastic nature of this approach, the 30 best-performing parameter sets generated from the Latin hypercube sampling were used as the initial points for the MATLAB GlobalSearch algorithm. We repeat the entire procedure twice, once for the off-season and once for the peak season to estimate the relevant parameters. According to the parameter values mentioned in Table 1, we execute the aforesaid algorithm, which gives us the following graph.

Figure 8 depicts the variation of R0 with the variation of the length of the peak season, τ, using the linear operator method. It is evident that, for the variation of τ, R0 is always below 1 but shows a peak in the interval of 7–9 months, and after 9 months, it shows a gradual decline. The graph is in agreement with the results of Refs. [27, 52] improving over the algorithm provided in it.

Details are in the caption following the image
The graph represents the variation of R0 with a variation of value of τ determined using the linear operator method. Here, the τ value has been scaled to [0, 1] dividing by ω.

Now we plug in the value of parameters in the normalized system (2), which verifies the fact that DFE is stable and the infection dies out eventually (see Figure 9).

Details are in the caption following the image
Simulation of (2) for a given set of parameters, which exhibits that the DFE is stable.

In nonautonomous cases like this, the classical time-average method has been seen to overplay or underplay the disease transmission risk [50] for the method relies on replacing periodic parameters, which in terms is not necessarily the original model. Contrary to the time-average method, it can be readily verified from Theorems C.1 and C.2 that the linear operator method by construction relies on the original model and hence provides the most accurate estimation of the disease transmission risk. Although the linear operator method in cases provides a very accurate depiction of R0 in comparison to the time-average method, it is often more troublesome to be executed but can be executed in much more complicated cases compared to the time-average method [27, 52].

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis shows the influence of model parameters that have the greatest impact on the model’s dynamics. Using such analysis, epidemiologists can anticipate the critical parameters that play a critical role in disease-spreading dynamics.To determine the sensitivity of each parameter, we compute the partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) of each of the parameters with the data generated in the case of each compartments. The result is presented in Figure 10. The output will be considered statistically significant if the p value is less than 5%.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) PRCC value of the model (2) and (b) p values corresponding to the PRCC value.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) PRCC value of the model (2) and (b) p values corresponding to the PRCC value.

From Figure 10, we can deduce that the most impactful parameters in DENV transmission are the gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate of the vector (αv), the gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate of the host (αh), and the recovery rate of the host (ζ).

To understand the sensitivity of the aforementioned parameters on the dynamics of the model, we simulate the model numerically for controlled perturbation of the parameter values and visualize the effect on the infected compartments for both the host and vector side by side in the following discussion.

3.3.1. Effect of Gross Birth Rate or Per Capita Mortality Rate of Vector (αv)

Figures 11(a) and 11(b) depict that the number of infections both in the case of vector and host increases with the decrease in the value of αv and the same proportionality can be observed for the increment in the value of αv. Hence, the infection dynamics in the heterogeneous population distribution are highly influenced by the deviation in the value of αv.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with upto 20% deviation of values of αv. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with upto 20% deviation of values of αv.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with upto 20% deviation of values of αv. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with upto 20% deviation of values of αv.

3.3.2. Effect of Gross Birth Rate or Per Capita Mortality Rate of Host (αh)

Figures 12(a) and 12(b) depict that the number of infections both in the case of vector and host decreases with the decrease in the value of αh and the same proportionality can be observed for the increment in the value of αh. Hence, the infection dynamics in the heterogeneous population distribution are highly influenced by the deviation in the value of αh.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with upto 20% deviation of values of αh. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with upto 20% deviation of values of αh.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with upto 20% deviation of values of αh. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with upto 20% deviation of values of αh.

3.3.3. Effect of Recovery Rate of Host (ζ)

Figures 13(a) and 13(b) depict that the number of infections both in the case of vector and host decreases with the decrease in the value of ζ and the same proportionality can be observed for the increment in the value of ζ. Hence, the infection dynamics in the heterogeneous population distribution are highly influenced by the deviation in the value of ζ.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with up to 20% deviation of values of ζ. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with up to 20% deviation of values of ζ.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Significant deviation of Ih with up to 20% deviation of values of ζ. (b) Significant deviation of Iv with up to 20% deviation of values of ζ.

4. Discussion

This work has presented an explicit technique for using the linear operator method while avoiding algorithmic complexity, as well as findings that are consistent with earlier research [27, 45, 52, 59] and methodologies. The sensitivity analysis of the parameters in question has provided insight for public health officials on what to put the most weight on. It is evident that the most impactful parameter on the host dynamics is the gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate of the vector (αv) followed by recovery rate (ζ), and for that of the vector, these are gross birth rate/per capita mortality rate of the vector (αv) followed by the peak season infection rate of the vector (bv). Hence, a strong emphasis must be placed on obstructing the growth of the vector population, defensive treatment of the infected, and curbing the number of interactions between the vector and host in order to flatten the curve in case of a raging epidemic. The assumptions used in this model constrained it; for example, the periodicity provided here was a square wave function, which may still be expanded to a much more generalized periodic function. The method proposed in this paper relies heavily on symbolic computation and hence can be a bit challenging to implement if the model is too complex. The simplification of this algorithm through theoretical advancement or to provide an alternate algorithm that elevates the problem of underperformance of the time-average method in the case of a nonautonomous system can be a potent avenue for research. There are aspects of the study that are looking for a technique that can offer the closed form of R0, which helps with interpretability and analytic reasoning since the linear operator approach provides a numerical form of the fundamental reproduction number.

In the past we have seen that the worst known dengue outbreak in Bangladesh was in 2019, shown in Figure 2. A heat map comparison of the number of reported dengue cases during the years 2019, 2021, and 2022 is portrayed in Figures 14, 15, and 16, respectively. Each of the polygons in the heat map represents each division (first of order of administrative level in the country) of Bangladesh. We could not illustrate that of the year 2020 due to data unavailability.

Details are in the caption following the image
Heat map of dengue infection in Bangladesh during 2019.
Details are in the caption following the image
Heat map of dengue infection in Bangladesh during 2021.
Details are in the caption following the image
2022 DENV infection heat map of Bangladesh.

During the year 2019, the center and the southwestern regions of the country were the most affected regions followed by the southeastern. In the following year 2021, we saw uniform horizontal propagation from the center, southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern regions in the order of decreasing intensity with the most intensity in the center. Finally, in the year of 2022, we observe a similar pattern of infection distribution to that of 2019, with an increased intensity toward the southeastern region than the center.

Given the progressive level of environmental degradation, rapid urbanization and industrialization of the rural landscape, and increased adaptability of the Aedes mosquito to the increasingly harsh environment and devised countermeasures, we fear that the outbreaks of the coming years will be much more widespread and intense even than that of 2019. To tackle such multifacet, transdisciplinary challenges, we need models that are neither purely mathematical, which are interpretable, nor purely black box models like deep learning models but rather a hybrid of such models [60] and also threshold parameters that are much more data driven by construction [61]. These can be some avenues that require further research.

5. Conclusion

The amount of health and financial losses caused by viral illness on human civilization from the dawn of time is unfathomable. DENV is no different. DENV peaks in the second half of the year (May to September) in tropical areas across the world. In Bangladesh, a tropical nation in southern Asia, the following graphic depicts DENV cases and deaths.

DENV has shown a surge in cases and deaths not just in Bangladesh but also in nearly all of its infected regions. This has put afflicted countries’ governments and public health professionals in a difficult position. The merit of this paper is to provide a revamped algorithm to generate the BRN for the nonautonomous system. Unlike the time-average method, the linear operator method preserves the property of nonautonomousness of the system while deriving the BRN and can be used in much more complicated systems where the time-average method underperforms.

Ethics Statement

No consent is required to publish this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

M.K. and M.A.M. contributed to conceptualization; M.A.M. helped in methodology; M.A.M. and M.K. contributed to software; M.K. and S.C. helped in validation; M.A.M. and M.K. contributed to formal analysis; M.M.M. helped in investigation; S.C. and M.M.M. contributed to resources; M.A.M. helped in data curation; M.A.M. and M.K. prepared the original draft; M.M.M., S.C., and M.K. contributed to review and editing; and M.K. helped in supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project did not receive any funding.

Acknowledgments

M. Kamrujjaman acknowledges the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process. During the preparation of this work, the authors never used any tools/services of AI and AI-assisted technologies.

    Appendix A: Additional Figures

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Close-up view of Figure 1.
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Close-up view of Figure 2.

    Appendix B: The Linear Operator Method

    Significant developments have been achieved in terms of the theoretical aspect of the stability theory of equilibria of the nonlinear autonomous system. Hartman and Grobman in their 1960 paper proved a theorem named “Hartman–Grobman Theorem, showing that the linearized system can be used to study the local stability of a nonlinear autonomous system around a hyperbolic equilibrium point [62]. Kenneth Palmer in 1975 pushed forth the hypothesis in the realm of nonautonomous systems [63]. This facilitates to use a linearized system for analyzing the stability of the DFE in Assumption 6.

    Given that the assumptions mentioned in 2.4.1 hold, the BRN of the model can be determined by perturbing the DFE state, x0(t). The classic theory of the linear periodic system by Ref. [64] states ∃K, β > 0, such that
    ()
    which implies
    ()
    Let Φ(s) be a ω-periodic function in s that defines the vector of infected individuals. Thus, can be interpreted as the distribution vector of newly infected individuals at time s. For ts, defines the infected populous who were newly infected at time s and will remain infected at time t. Then,
    ()
    defines the aggregated distribution of new infections at time t induced by infected populous introduced prior to time, t.
    Let B(ω) be the ordered Banach space of all functions h such that
    • ,

    • ,

    • ‖.‖ be the defined norm,

    • is the positive cone.

    Following the aforesaid structure, we consider a linear operator defined as
    ()
    can be interpreted as the new infection operator; hence, the spectral radius of is defined as
    ()
    for the periodic epidemic model by arguments similar to Ref. [45]. A different linear operator on B(ω) can be devised by logic analogous to Ref. [24],
    ()

    Reference [24] defined as the BRN. The proof of equivalence of BRN for and has been provided by Ref. [52], which also portrays the deviation in the biological interpretation of the kernels.

    Much like autonomous systems, the intuitive step for the validation of the defined quantity to be a threshold parameter of the disease invasion (i.e., R0 < 1) implies that the disease-free periodic solution is stable, while it is unstable if R0 > 1. A proof of this correlation by adopting an antithetic approach to enumerate BRN for characterizing and computing R0 in the case of a periodic system was provided by Ref. [52]. The motivation behind this approach is the complexity of handling linear operators; hence, they opt out of Floquet theory [27].

    Assume
    ()
    be a linear equation with parameter λ ∈ (0, ) and periodicity ω. Suppose the evolution operator of System (B.7) on be . It was shown by Ref. [52] that W(t, s, λ) is positive in for each . The Perron–Frobenius theorem states that ρ(W(ω, 0, λ)) is an eigenvalue of W(ω, 0, λ) with a nonnegative eigenvector. Theorems C.1 and C.2 proved by Ref. [52] connect R0 initially with W followed by the monodromy matrix in the case of (B.7).

    The aforesaid discussion provides the theoretical background of the algorithm devised in 2.4.2 and asserts the newly defined quantity as a valid threshold parameter that correlates with R0.

    Appendix C: Important Theorems and Lemma

    Theorem C.1. If the assumption of 2.4.1 holds, then the proceeding statements hold:

    • i.

      ρ(W(ω, 0, λ)) = 1 has a positive solution, λ0λ0 is an eigenvalue of , and hence R0 > 0.

    • ii.

      R0 > 0⟹λ = R0 is the unique solution of ρ(W(ω, 0, λ)) = 1.

    • iii.

      R0 = 0 iff ρ(W(ω, 0, λ)) < 1∀ λ > 0.

    Theorem C.2. If the assumption of 2.4.1 holds, then the proceeding statements hold:

    • i.

      R0 = 1 iff .

    • ii.

      R0 > 1 iff .

    • iii.

      R0 < 1 iff .

    Lemma C.1. If x0 is a DFE of (5) and g(x) satisfies Assumptions 1 to 5, then the derivatives and are partitioned as

    ()
    where F and V are the m × m matrices defined by
    ()

    Furthermore, is nonnegative, is a nonsingular M-matrix, and all eigenvalues of J4 have a positive real part.

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are restricted by government policy and can be provided on a properly justified request.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.