Volume 2023, Issue 1 9764870
Erratum
Open Access

Erratum to “Changes in Retinal Thickness and Brain Volume during 6.8-Year Escalating Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis”

Max Borgström

Max Borgström

Division of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden liu.se

Search for more papers by this author
Mats Fredrikson

Mats Fredrikson

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Forum Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden liu.se

Search for more papers by this author
Magnus Vrethem

Magnus Vrethem

Division of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden liu.se

Search for more papers by this author
Pierfrancesco Mirabelli

Pierfrancesco Mirabelli

Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden liu.se

Search for more papers by this author
Hans Link

Hans Link

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden ki.se

Search for more papers by this author
Yumin Huang-Link

Corresponding Author

Yumin Huang-Link

Division of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden liu.se

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 October 2023

In the article titled “Changes in Retinal Thickness and Brain Volume during 6.8-Year Escalating Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis” [1], incorrect versions of Figures 1(a) and 1(b) were published due to an error in the production process. Specifically, “baseline” and “high-efficacy DMT” on the x-axis are incorrectly labelled. In addition, the x-axis labels are displaced from the corresponding bar chart columns. The correct figures are shown below.

Details are in the caption following the image
Changes of GCIPL and pRNFL thickness over time. Bar charts represent the individual GCIPL (a) and pRNFL (b) from best eye of each patient during three different time points. The thickness of GCIPL was significantly thinner during 1st-line DMT (p < 0.01) and high-efficacy DMT (p < 0.05) compared to baseline. There are no significant differences of pRNFL thickness among the three different time points. DMT: disease-modifying treatment; GCIPL: ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer; pRNFL: peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer.
Details are in the caption following the image
Changes of GCIPL and pRNFL thickness over time. Bar charts represent the individual GCIPL (a) and pRNFL (b) from best eye of each patient during three different time points. The thickness of GCIPL was significantly thinner during 1st-line DMT (p < 0.01) and high-efficacy DMT (p < 0.05) compared to baseline. There are no significant differences of pRNFL thickness among the three different time points. DMT: disease-modifying treatment; GCIPL: ganglion cell inner-plexiform layer; pRNFL: peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.