Volume 2023, Issue 1 3977739
Case Report
Open Access

Prolonged Disease Course of COVID-19 in a Patient with CTLA-4 Haploinsufficiency

T. W. Hoffman

Corresponding Author

T. W. Hoffman

Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands antoniusziekenhuis.nl

Search for more papers by this author
H. L. Leavis

H. L. Leavis

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, Netherlands uu.nl

Search for more papers by this author
B. M. Smits

B. M. Smits

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, Netherlands uu.nl

Search for more papers by this author
L. T. van der Veken

L. T. van der Veken

Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, Netherlands umcutrecht.nl

Search for more papers by this author
D. A. van Kessel

D. A. van Kessel

Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands antoniusziekenhuis.nl

Department of Pulmonology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, Netherlands uu.nl

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 May 2023
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Rajni Rani

Abstract

Patients with primary immunodeficiencies are especially vulnerable to developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an important regulator of immune responses, and patients who suffer from CTLA4 haploinsufficiency have hyperactivation of effector T cells and infiltration of various organs. Overexpression of CTLA4 has been associated with a more severe disease course in patients with COVID-19, but there have only been a few reports on the disease course of COVID-19 in patients with CTLA4 haploinsufficiency. We report on a 33-year-old female with a history of immune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease, and common variable immunodeficiency who developed COVID-19. She was admitted and discharged from the hospital several times in the months thereafter and remained symptomatic and had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR for up to 137 days after the first symptoms. No SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were identified in the patients’ serum. The disease was finally controlled after repeated infusions of convalescent plasma and treatment of concurrent bacterial and fungal infections. Genetic analysis revealed a likely pathogenic variant in CTLA4, and CTLA4 expression on regulatory T-cells was low. This case illustrates that patients with primary immunodeficiencies who have a protracted disease course of COVID-19 could benefit from convalescent plasma therapy.

1. Introduction

Patients with primary immunodeficiencies can be especially vulnerable to developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1, 2]. Most patients with immunodeficiencies are able to clear the virus with or without supportive therapies. However, some patients have a prolonged disease course with viral shedding and symptoms persisting for months [3, 4]. The optimal treatment for COVID-19 in patients with primary immunodeficiency remains to be determined, but various case series report on successful treatment with convalescent plasma [5].

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an important regulator of immune responses, and patients who suffer from CTLA4 haploinsufficiency have hyperactivation of effector T cells and infiltration of various organs. Furthermore, patients have decreased circulating B-cells but increased auto-reactive B-cells [6]. Clinical phenotypes of CTLA4 haploinsufficiency include bronchiectasis, granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD), autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune neutropenia, enteropathy, type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroiditis, arthritis, psoriasis, malignancy, and lymphocytic infiltration of nonlymphoid organs [7].

Overexpression of CTLA4 has been associated with a more severe disease course in patients with COVID-19 [8, 9], but there have only been a few reports on the disease course of COVID-19 in patients with CTLA4 haploinsufficiency [1]. Here, we report the case of a patient with CTLA4 haploinsufficiency who had a prolonged disease course of COVID-19 that was eventually controlled after multiple infusions of convalescent plasma. The patient provided written informed consent for publication of this report.

2. Case Presentation

A 33-year-old female presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. Her past medical history noted that she had recurrent respiratory tract infections since puberty. Furthermore, she had immune thrombocytopenia when she was 20 years old, which was treated with prednisone. Nine months thereafter, she was treated with rituximab for a relapse of immune thrombocytopenia and also autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. When she was 22 years old, she had septic arthritis and was diagnosed with panhypogammaglobulinemia. Additional immune status investigation revealed a severely impaired polysaccharide vaccination response [10] (Table 1). She started monthly substitution therapy with intravenous immunoglobulins. The patient was referred for genetic analysis of her immunodeficiency at that time, but this did not reveal any abnormalities.

Table 1. Immune status investigations when the patient was 22 years old, prior to starting intravenous immunoglobulin substitution therapy.
Patient’s result Normal range
IgA (g/L) 0.24 0.70–4.00
IgM (g/L) <0.30 0.40–2.30
IgG (g/L) 2.74 7.00–16.00
IgG1 (g/L) 2.60 4.90–11.40
IgG2 (g/L) 0.20 1.50–6.40
IgG3 (g/L) 0.50 0.20–1.10
IgG4 (g/L) 0.02 0.08–1.40
Complement AP (%) 115 30–115
Complement CP (%) 128 70–130
Complement MP (%) 145 10–125
Response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination Severely impaired Normal
Toxoplasma IgG (IU/mL) <2 >7.2
Diphtheria antibodies (IU/mL) 0.03 >0.01
Rubella IgG (IU/mL) 11 >10
Tetanus antibodies (IU/mL) 0.38 >0.01
  • Interpretation of the response to pneumococcal vaccination was based on the 2015 AAAAI/ACAAI criteria. [10]. AP = alternative pathway; CP = classical pathway; MP = lectin pathway.

Thereafter, she did not have recurrent respiratory tract infections, but she did show a gradual decline in her lung function, especially the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). On chest computed tomography (CT) scans, multiple consolidations and ground glass areas were seen in the lower fields, as well as pleural and fissural irregularities, most consistent with a granulomatous disease (Figure 1(a); further CT-imaging in the course of the patient’s life is provided in Figures 1(b)1(j)). When she was 24 years old, she underwent a lung biopsy through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, which did not lead to a classifying diagnosis but only revealed mild reactive changes. Afterwards, she had recurrent respiratory tract infections, including sinusitis, for which she underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery at age 25. At age 27, she was treated with prednisone maintenance therapy, initially at 15 mg/day and later at 5 mg/day. She had pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia shortly after initiation of prednisone therapy but recovered after antibiotic treatment. At age 29, she had septic arthritis again and was still having recurrent respiratory tract infections.

Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.
Details are in the caption following the image
chest computed tomography scan at age 22 years, as well as multiple scans during follow up over the years. The scan at age 33 years was made when the patient presented to the emergency department with COVID-19. (a) Bilateral consolidations that are not well circumscribed, multiple nodules, fissural and pleural irregularities and multiple ground glass areas. Diffuse thickening of bronchial walls. Overall appearance suggestive of granulomatous disease. (b) Disappearance of multiple consolidations, and appearance of multiple new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities. (c) Disappearance of some consolidations in the lower fields, but appearance of new consolidations in the upper fields. (d) Disappearance of some consolidations and appearance of new consolidations and ground glass. (e) New consolidation in the left lower lobe. (f) Impressive progression of bronchiectasis in the left lower lobe, disappearance and appearance of consolidation and ground glass. (g) New consolidations and ground glass, mainly in the lower fields. (h) Pneumothorax on the left side, increase in ground glass and consolidations in both lungs. (i) Increase in pneumothorax on the left side, mediastinal shift to the right, increased bronchiectasis in the middle lobe. (j) Increased air in left upper lobe.

During the present episode (spring 2020, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands), she had a productive cough for seven days and a fever for one day. She had also experienced upper respiratory tract symptoms and a headache. On physical examination, the patient was febrile, with a temperature of 39.2 degrees Celsius and oxygen saturation while breathing ambient air of 91%. A CT-scan of the chest was performed, which revealed pre-existent bronchiectasis with new consolidations and ground glass abnormalities in the lower fields (Figure 1(f)). A pharyngeal swab analysed by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction came back positive.

The patient was admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 and was started on supplemental oxygen (2 L/minute), cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, and chloroquine. In the next few days, her condition improved, and she could be weaned off from supplemental oxygen. H. influenzae, resistant to cefuroxime, was grown from a sputum culture, and antibiotics were switched to oral cotrimoxazole. The patient could be discharged home five days after admission.

Nine days after discharge, she presented to the emergency department again with persistent fever and a left-sided pneumothorax, with a maximum thickness of 22 mm. The SARS-CoV-2 PCR on a pharyngeal swab was positive. The patient was readmitted and treated for a presumed bacterial pneumonia with cefotaxime for seven days. No intervention was performed for the pneumothorax. On a bronchoscopy for bronchial washings no bacteria were cultured. A chest CT scan showed persistent ground glass abnormalities in both lungs, in addition to a small left-sided pneumothorax and a right-sided consolidation (Figure 1(g)). After admission, the patient showed slow clinical improvement, and the pneumothorax regressed. She was discharged fifteen days after admission.

Twelve days after discharge from the second hospitalization, the patient presented to the emergency department again with a persistent fever. A chest X-ray showed a right-sided consolidation. A pharyngeal swab sent for SARS-CoV-2 PCR came back positive. Because the patient had relatively mild symptoms at that time, she was treated as an out-patient with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. However, fevers did not subside, and the patient complained of an increased cough. From sputum, S. aureus was cultured and the patient was treated with flucloxacillin, with initial improvement of symptoms.

However, two weeks later (eleven weeks after the initial emergency department presentation), the patient was admitted for the third time with an increased cough, recurring fever, and acute-onset dyspnoea. A chest X-ray revealed a left-sided pneumothorax that had enlarged to 44 mm (from <5 mm) and a persistent right-sided consolidation. A chest drain was placed under local anaesthesia, and cefuroxime was started. Due to hemodynamic instability, the patient was admitted to the intensive care for inotropic support.

The SARS-CoV-2 PCR on a pharyngeal swab was positive again, as was the PCR for rhinovirus. A. fumigatus was isolated from a previously submitted sputum culture. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the patients’ serum were found to be very low. The patient was started on voriconazole because of concern for pulmonary aspergillosis, even though she did not fulfill criteria for probable or possible invasive fungal disease. Furthermore, she received two infusions with donor convalescent plasma at a two-week interval. The patient slowly improved. After transfer to the pulmonology ward, two more infusions of convalescent plasma were repeatedly administered. Voriconazole was discontinued. Due to the recurrence of the pneumothorax, a bullectomy and pleurectomy were performed during the mini thoracotomy. Two months after initial admission, she could be discharged home. At that time the fever had disappeared and she was feeling better.

Three repetitive weakly pharyngeal swabs remained negative for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. The patient reported a decreased cough and dyspnoea and did not have any more fevers. In the following year, the patient was admitted four more times: once for haemoptysis which was related to bleeding from pathologic bronchial arteries and for which bronchial artery embolization was performed two times for bacterial pneumonia and a fourth time for a recurrent pneumothorax, for which a chest drain was placed. Multiple pharyngeal swabs and sputum samples tested for SARS-CoV-2 PCR were negative.

However, despite being vaccinated with the Pfizer/BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine twice (10 and 11 months after the initial presentation with COVID-19), the patient did not have detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 10 months after the initial presentation with COVID-19 (Table 2).

Table 2. SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, and convalescent plasma infusions.
Days after start of first symptoms of COVID-19 Protective antibody level Antibody level (A/CO) SARS-CoV-2 PCR Ct-value Sample
7 Positive 24.6 Oropharynx
20 Positive 30.8 Oropharynx
25 Negative 0.020
32 Negative NA Bronchial washing
33 Positive NA Nasopharynx
49 Positive NA Nasopharynx
61 Positive 29.7 Sputum
83 Positive 23.8 Oropharynx
88 Negative 0.024
89 First transfusion of convalescent plasma
89 Positive 4.830
91 Positive NA Oropharynx
94 Positive 32.4 Oropharynx
96 Negative 0.527
98 Negative 0.381
101 Positive 28.1 Oropharynx
103 Second transfusion of convalescent plasma
110 Positive 9.083 Positive 27.6 Oropharynx
116 Positive 10.203 Positive 38.9 Oropharynx
119 Third transfusion of convalescent plasma
123 Positive 7.437 Negative NA Oropharynx
126 Positive 28.9 Oropharynx
130 Negative NA Oropharynx
131 Positive 4.523
133 Fourth transfusion of convalescent plasma
136 Positive NA Oropharynx
137 Positive 13.935 Positive 36.8 Oropharynx
143 Positive 12.567
144 Negative NA Oropharynx
146 Negative NA Oropharynx
146 Fifth transfusion of convalescent plasma
153 Negative NA Oropharynx
165 Positive >14 Negative NA Oropharynx
165 Sixth transfusion of convalescent plasma
181 Positive >14 Negative NA Oropharynx
196 Negative NA Oropharynx
207 Positive 10.602
236 Positive 4.050 Negative NA Oropharynx
275 Negative NA Oropharynx
291 First SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
300 Negative <3.80 (IgG (AU/mL))
319 Second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
384 Negative <1.85 (IgG (AU/mL))
414 Negative NA Oropharynx
417 Negative <1.85 (IgG (AU/mL))
553 Negative NA Sputum
  • Reference numbers for antibody levels are >1.1 A/CO and >13 AU/mL. Ct = cycle threshold. NA = not available.

Because of the protracted disease course of COVID-19, the patient was referred for lymphocyte subset analysis. This revealed 0 B cells, low CD4+, CD8+, and naive T cells (Table 3). Furthermore, next-generation sequencing was performed, with filtering of the results for 426 genes associated with primary immunodeficiencies (PID00v20.2; Utrecht University Medical Center). This revealed an in-frame deletion-insertion variant in the CTLA4 gene (c.231_c297delinsA p.(Gln80_Ser101del)) classified as likely pathogenic. This variant has not been found in ∼140000 healthy controls and was not previously described in the ClinVar Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/; now submitted under ClinVar accession ID VCV001801487.1) or Human Gene Mutation Database (https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php). No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in the other genes in the gene panel associated with primary immunodeficiencies.

Table 3. Lymphocyte subset analysis performed when the patient was 34 years old and had recovered from COVID-19.
Patient’s result Normal range
T cells (/μL) 251 700–1900
CD4+ (/μL) 117 560–1067
CD8+ (/μL) 144 216–499
CD4/CD8-ratio 0.8 1.4–4.0
Activated T cells (% within CD4) 1.0 0.3–1.0
Naive T cells (% within CD4) 15.5 49.4–71.9
Effector T cells (% within CD4) 84.5 27.3–49.8
Activated T cells (% within CD8) 0.6 0.9–4.2
Naive T cells (% within CD8) 13.1 48.6–87.5
Effector T cells (% within CD8) 86.9 11.7–42.9
B cells (/μL) 0 114–436
NK cells (/μL) 36 100–400

Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells as previously described [11]. Of all CD4+-cells, 7.2% were regulatory T-cells. The mean fluorescence intensity of CTLA-4 on our patients’ regulatory T-cells was 1057, which was lower than the 95% confidence interval calculated for healthy controls (2038–3191, Figure 2).

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) CTLA4 expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient (in red), as well as healthy controls (in blue, green, and yellow). (b) ICOS expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (c) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (d) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) CTLA4 expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient (in red), as well as healthy controls (in blue, green, and yellow). (b) ICOS expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (c) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (d) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) CTLA4 expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient (in red), as well as healthy controls (in blue, green, and yellow). (b) ICOS expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (c) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (d) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) CTLA4 expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient (in red), as well as healthy controls (in blue, green, and yellow). (b) ICOS expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (c) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls. (d) Expression in CD25+ FOXP3+ T-cells within CD4+ population in our patient and healthy controls.

3. Discussion

This case illustrates that patients with primary immunodeficiencies can have a protracted disease course of COVID-19. This has been the subject of several previous reports [1, 3, 12], but the SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity of 137 days in our patient is especially long in comparison. Two previously reported patients with CTLA4-haploinsufficiency who developed COVID-19 seemed to have a shorter disease course, although the duration of SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity for these patients was not reported [1].

That some patients with immunodeficiency have such a protracted disease course, and other do not likely depends on the precise immune defect. It is known that patients with primary immunodeficiencies are at risk for severe, recurrent, and sustained viral infections with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 [13].

The optimal treatment for immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 remains to be determined. The use of convalescent plasma does seem beneficial in immunocompromised patients without antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, but evidence for any specific type of immunodeficiency is still anecdotal [5, 14]. At what time in the course of the disease convalescent plasma could be given best, as well as the optimal dose and dosing interval, is still unclear. It is also not clear how long convalescent plasma should be given in cases with a protracted disease course who have relatively mild symptoms. The strategy that was employed in this patient, where regular SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were done and the convalescent plasma was given two more times after the last positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and clinical improvement of the patient, seems reasonable. Monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed and have been used in immunocompromised patients as well [15]. However, these could not be used in this case, as they were not available at the time our patient was treated with convalescent plasma. In addition, viral escape from monoclonal antibodies over time has proven problematic, and high-titre polyclonal convalescent plasma seems promising despite viral shift (as currently tested in the convalescent plasma domain within the REMAP-CAP trial [16]). Of note, our patient probably received few antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 via her monthly intravenous immunoglobulin substitution therapy during the period in which she received convalescent plasma, as the overall seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in that period was only around 5% [17].

In retrospect, the overall clinical picture of our patient is consistent with CTLA4-haploinsufficiency. Immune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia together can be seen in the context of Evans’ syndrome, which can be seen in patients with CTLA4-haploinsufficiency [18]. GLILD and the patient’s immunodeficiency are also consistent with CTLA4-haploinsufficiency, which is usually characterized by antibody deficiency and low levels of naive T-cells [7]. The diagnosis of CTLA4-haploinsufficiency was made relatively late for our patient. The patient had been referred for genetic analysis of her immunodeficiency more than 10 years prior to developing COVID-19, which did not reveal any abnormalities. However, the gene panel at that time did not include CTLA4. Renewed genetic screening was prompted by the protracted disease course of COVID-19.

In conclusion, we report on a patient with a history of immune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, GLILD, and CVID, who developed COVID-19. She remained symptomatic and had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR for up to 137 days after the first symptoms. However, the disease was finally controlled after repeated infusions of convalescent plasma and treatment of concurrent bacterial and fungal infections. Genetic analysis revealed a likely pathogenic variant in CTLA4, CTLA4-expression on regulatory T-cells was confirmed to be low (as reported in CTLA4-haploinsufficiency by Schubert et al. [19]), and the entire clinical picture is consistent with CTLA4-haploinsufficiency.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. A. Abdelmoumen for his assistance with the CTLA-4 expression measurements.

    Data Availability

    The data used in this study are made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.