Volume 2022, Issue 1 7371538
Research Article
Open Access

[Retracted] Degree-Based Molecular Descriptors of Guar Gum and Its Chemical Derivatives

M. C. Shanmukha

M. C. Shanmukha

Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering and Technology, Srinivas University, Mangalore 574146, India cet.edu.in

Search for more papers by this author
A. Usha

A. Usha

Department of Mathematics, Alliance School of Applied Mathematics, Bangalore 562106, India

Search for more papers by this author
M. K. Siddiqui

M. K. Siddiqui

Department of Mathematics, Comsats University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan comsats.edu.pk

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel Asefa Fufa

Corresponding Author

Samuel Asefa Fufa

Department of Mathematics, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia aau.edu.et

Search for more papers by this author
B. M. Praveen

B. M. Praveen

Department of Chemistry, College of Engineering and Technology, Srinivas University, Mangalore 574146, India cet.edu.in

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 February 2022
Citations: 7
Academic Editor: Haidar Ali

Abstract

The most abundant polycarbonates that are found in food are polysaccharides. A long chain of monosaccharide with glycosidic linkages forms polymeric carbohydrates. These carbohydrates with water in the process of hydrolysis produces sugar monosaccharides or oligosaccharides. The examples of polysaccharides include starch, galactogen, and glycogen. They contribute various applications mainly in food storage, pharmaceutical industry, and petroleum extraction. In this work, a polysaccharide known as guar gum is studied and also ten degree-based topological indices, namely, Zagreb indices, Randic index, general Randic index, forgotten index, ABC index, GA index, GH index, Sombor index, and SS index are computed. The chemical derivatives of guar gum such as HPG, CMG, and CMHPG are studied, and topological indices are determined. Finally, numerical and graphical comparison of all the above said ten indices are made for guar gum and its chemical derivatives.

1. Introduction

The cells in living organisms produce natural polymers called biopolymers. They possess monomers, reacts with other monomers to form a larger polymer chain. Biopolymers based on the monomers used are classified into three types such as, polynucleotides, polypeptides, and polysaccharides. Polysaccharides have significant applications in recovery of petroleum in every phase of recovery, from well drilling in wastewater treatment due to its versatile functions that include thickening, cross linking, and adsorption. The fluid properties are corrected using biopolymers as additives, helps in cost of petroleum recovery, and enhances the efficiency. A type of hydrocarbon fluid that is extracted from the oil well is petroleum. The oil wells are drilled with deepness of 20 000 feet to extract petrol in the crude form. The process of oil production has various stages starting from the primary stage where the early stage in production is driven by fluid and rock expansion and gravity drainage which results in recovery of 10% of original oil in place. It is followed by variation in the reservoir pressure, and the recovery increases incrementally.

Biopolymers are utilized as additives in the extraction of petroleum. They will enhance the efficiency and safety of the recovery process. The biopolymers such as xanthan gum, scleroglucan, and their products are useful in the drilling and production process as thickness agents while guar gum and its derivatives are used in hydraulic fracture in the transportation of petroleum. The monomeric sugars attached to O-glycosidic linkages form a larger structure resulting in the biopolymer polysaccharide. Prior to the use of biopolymers in the petroleum industry, it was widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. As biopolymers have enormous applications, it is extracted or fermented on a large scale as they are cost-effective.

The guar gum, a type of polysaccharide, is also termed as guaran. It is extracted from beans of guar and has been significantly used as a thickening agent in food and industrial applications. It is off-white, free-flowing powder that is dehusked, hydrated, and milled mechanically. The biggest guar producing countries include India, Pakistan, Sudan, and the USA. 80% of world’s guar production is in Rajasthan and India because of its best suitable climatic conditions especially for growing guar seeds.

The guar gum has been extensively used as emulsifier, thickening agent, and stabilizer in the food, beverage, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. Also, it is widely used as hydrofracking liquid in the petroleum industry. The extensive use of guar in the petroleum industry impacts in a large transport volume of guar from India to the USA.

The direct extraction of the guar gum from plant material using fermentation is comparatively cheaper than polysaccharide biopolymers. A span of chemical derivatives of guar gum with modifications have been synthesized, improves the solubility, and rheological properties in hydrofracking fluid.

Hydroxypropyl guar (HPG), carboxymethyl guar (CMG), and carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar (CMHPG) are the chemical derivatives synthesized using guar gum. HPG is synthesized using isopropyl alcohol, propylene oxide, and guar gum while CMG uses two-step reactions with sodium hydroxide with guar gum to form alkoxides and CMHPG is formed with the reaction of guar alkoxides and chloroacetic acid [1].

In chemical graph theory, a mathematical formula that can be applied to any graph refers to a topological index or numerical invariant [26]. In the literature, various topological indices discussed based on degree and its neighborhood degree for numerous graph structures helps in analysing physicochemical properties of a molecule [79]. This tool is very efficient as it is cost-effective and requires less time [1014].

In the present scenario, numerical invariants play a remarkable role in the investigation of physicochemical properties and biological activities of chemical compounds through quantitative structure-activity relationship/quantitative structure-property relationship/quantitative structure-toxicity relationship (QSAR/QSPR/QSTR) studies [1518].

The drastic growth of the studies on the topological theory widened the thinking of chemists about the chemical behaviour of the compounds by examining its molecular graph. The indices help the chemists to understand its characteristics, which help in the applications related to bioinformatics and proteomics. The study of topological indices help the researchers work on the compounds and its chemical network making it possible to elaborate their inquests related to drugs, medicine, medical research, and experimental science in the QSAR/QSPR analysis [19, 20].

In this work, a polysaccharide known as guar gum and its chemical derivatives HPG, CMG, and CMHPG are modelled as molecular graphs [21, 22]. The topological indices are computed assuming the atoms as vertices and their bonds as edges. Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph with V and E denoting the vertices and edges, respectively. For graph terminologies and notations, refer [2325].

The earliest set of topological indices are the first and the second version of Zagreb indices. They have been found impressive in finding the total π-electron energy of molecules. Gutman and Trinajstic [26, 27] introduced these indices in the year 1972 and are defined as follows:
(1)
(2)
Randic index is one of the classical indices introduced by Milan Randic [28] in the year 1975 has numerous applications in the analysis of chemical compounds of QSAR/QSPR studies and applications in molecular branching. It is defined as follows:
(3)
In 1998, Bollobas et al. [29] proposed the general Randic index and is defined as
(4)
The forgotten index was first defined by Furtula et al. [30] in 2015. It became popular as its performance in the prediction of the index is similar to that of the original Zagreb index and is defined as
(5)
The atom-bond connectivity (ABC) index was first determined by Estrada et al. [31] and has benefited in predicting the index in the study of heat of formation in alkanes, and it is defined as
(6)
Vukicevic et al. [32] proposed the geometric-arithmetic (GA) index and is defined as
(7)
Usha et al. [33] proposed the geometric-harmonic (GH) index and is defined as
(8)
Recently, Gutman [34] formulated the Sombor index and is defined as
(9)
A novel graph invariant called the SS index of a graph is proposed by Zhao et al. [35] and is stated as
(10)

2. Methodology

Initially, the molecular structure of guar gum and its chemical derivatives are modelled as molecular graphs, and vertex, edge partitions are determined. The popular degree-based topological indices are computed for the above said molecular graphs. Subsequently, graphical comparison of the ten defined indices for the four chemical graphs are made. In this procedure, the methods used are vertex partition, edge partition, and combinatorial computing.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Results for the Molecular Graph of Guar gum

From Figures 1 and 2, the details of degrees of vertices and their edges are tabulated in Table 1 for the molecular graph of guar gum.

Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
1. The edge partition of the molecular graph of guar gum based on degrees of the end vertices of each edge.
(dν, dω) where νωE(G) No. of edges
E1 = (1,2) 1
E2 = (1,3) 7n + 1
E3 = (2,2) 2n
E4 = (2,3) 14n − 1
E5 = (3,3) 9n

Theorem 1. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(11)

Proof. From equation (1) and Table 1, M1(G) for guar gum is

(12)

Theorem 2. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(13)

Proof. From equation (2) and Table 1, M2(G) for guar gum is

(14)

Theorem 3. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(15)

Proof. From equation (4) and Table 1, Rα(G) for guar gum is

(16)

Theorem 4. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(17)

Proof. From equation (5) and Table 1, F(G) for guar gum is

(18)

Theorem 5. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(19)

Proof. From equation (6) and Table 1, ABC(G) for guar gum is

(20)

Theorem 6. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(21)

Proof. From equation (7) and Table 1, GA(G) for guar gum is

(22)

Theorem 7. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(23)

Proof. From equation (8) and Table 1, GH(G) for guar gum is

(24)

Theorem 8. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(25)

Proof. From equation (9) and Table 1, SO(G) for guar gum is

(26)

Theorem 9. Consider a molecular graph G for guar gum, then,

(27)

Proof. From equation (10) and Table 1, SS(G) for guar gum is

(28)

3.2. Results for the Molecular Graph of HPG and CMG

During the modelling of the chemical derivatives of guar gum such as HPG and CMG into molecular graphs, it was noticed that the vertex and edge partitions were found to be similar, and hence, the results for the abovementioned chemical derivatives are computed together as follows.

From Figures 3 and 4 the details of degrees of vertices and their edges are tabulated in Table 2 for the molecular graph of HPG and CMG.

Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
2. The edge partition of the molecular graph of hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar based on degrees of the end vertices of each edge.
(dν, dω) where νωE(G) No. of edges
E1 = (1,2) 2n + 1
E2 = (1,3) 7n + 1
E3 = (2,2) 4n
E4 = (2,3) 14n − 1
E5 = (3,3) 12n

Theorem 10. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(29)

Proof. From equation (1) and Table 2, M1(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(30)

Theorem 11. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(31)

Proof. From equation (2) and Table 2, M2(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(32)

Theorem 12. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(33)

Proof. From equation (4) and Table 2, Rα(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(34)

Theorem 13. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(35)

Proof. From equation (5) and Table 2, F(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(36)

Theorem 14. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(37)

Proof. From equation (6) and Table 2, ABC(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(38)

Theorem 15. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(39)

Proof. From equation (7) and Table 2, GA(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(40)

Theorem 16. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(41)

Proof. From equation (8) and Table 2, GH(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(42)

Theorem 17. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(43)

Proof. From equation (9) and Table 2, SO(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(44)

Theorem 18. Consider a molecular graph G for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar, then,

(45)

Proof. From equation (10) and Table 2, SS(G) for hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethyl guar is

(46)

3.3. Results for the Molecular Graph of CMHPG

From Figure 5, the details of degrees of vertices and their edges are tabulated in Table 3 for the molecular graph of carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar (CMHPG).

Details are in the caption following the image
3. The edge partition of the molecular graph of carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar based on degrees of the end vertices of each edge.
(dν, dω) where νωE(G) No. of edges
E1 = (1,2) 3n + 1
E2 = (1,3) 6n + 1
E3 = (2,2) 5n
E4 = (2,3) 15n − 1
E5 = (3,3) 12n

Theorem 19. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(47)

Proof. From equation (1) and Table 3, M1(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(48)

Theorem 20. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar gum, then,

(49)

Proof. From equation (2) and Table 3, M2(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(50)

Theorem 21. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(51)

Proof. From equation (4) and Table 3, Rα(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(52)

Theorem 22. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(53)

Proof. From equation (5) and Table 3, F(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(54)

Theorem 23. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(55)

Proof. From equation (6) and Table 3, ABC(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(56)

Theorem 24. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(57)

Proof. From equation (7) and Table 3, GA(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(58)

Theorem 25. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(59)

Proof. From equation (8) and Table 3, GH(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(60)

Theorem 26. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(61)

Proof. From equation (9) and Table 3, SO(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(62)

Theorem 27. Consider a molecular graph G for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, then,

(63)

Proof. From equation (10) and Table 3, SS(G) for carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar is

(64)

4. Numerical Comparisons

For the comparison of guar gum, HPG and CMG, and CMHPG, indices values are computed for n = 1 to 10 and are as depicted in Tables 4, 5, and 6. It is observed that, by increasing the value of n, the order of values will also increases as shown in Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

4. Numerical representation of the computed indices for guar gum.
n M1 M2 R RR F ABC GA GH SO SS
1 162 193 14.636 78.114 432 23.846 31.61 198.442 118.243 35.008
2 322 387 28.396 155.531 862 46.876 62.39 397.422 234.693 69.429
3 482 581 42.156 232.948 1292 69.906 93.17 596.402 351.143 103.85
4 642 775 55.916 310.365 1722 92.936 123.95 795.382 467.593 138.271
5 802 969 69.676 387.782 2152 115.966 154.73 994.362 584.043 172.692
6 962 1163 83.436 465.199 2582 138.996 185.51 1193.3 700.493 207.113
7 1122 1357 97.196 542.616 3012 162.026 216.29 1392.3 816.943 241.534
8 1282 1551 110.956 620.033 3442 185.056 247.07 1591.3 933.393 275.955
9 1442 1745 124.716 697.45 3872 208.086 277.85 1790.3 1049.8 310.376
10 1602 1939 138.476 774.867 4302 231.116 308.63 1989.3 1166.3 344.797
5. Numerical representation of the computed indices for HPG and CMG.
n M1 M2 R RR F ABC GA GH SO SS
1 194 232 17.047 84.943 512 28.676 38.495 237.685 140.993 42.317
2 386 465 33.218 169.189 1022 56.536 76.16 475.908 280.193 84.047
3 578 698 49.389 253.435 1532 84.396 113.825 714.131 419.393 125.777
4 770 931 65.56 337.681 2042 112.256 151.49 952.354 558.593 167.507
5 962 1164 81.731 421.927 2552 140.116 189.155 1190.6 697.793 209.237
6 1154 1397 97.902 506.173 3062 167.976 226.82 1428.8 836.993 250.967
7 1346 1630 114.073 590.419 3572 195.836 264.485 1667 976.193 292.697
8 1538 1863 130.244 674.665 4082 223.696 302.15 1905.2 1115.393 334.427
9 1730 2096 146.415 758.911 4592 251.556 339.815 2143.5 1254.593 376.157
10 1922 2329 162.586 843.157 5102 279.416 377.48 2381.7 1393.793 417.887
6. Numerical representation of the computed indices for CMHPG.
n M1 M2 R RR F ABC GA GH SO SS
1 202 241 19.085 98.074 528 29.978 40.552 246.466 146.613 44.361
2 402 483 37.294 195.451 1054 59.14 80.274 493.47 291.433 88.135
3 602 725 55.503 292.828 1580 88.302 119.996 740.474 436.253 131.909
4 802 967 73.712 390.205 2106 117.464 159.718 987.478 581.073 175.683
5 1002 1209 91.921 487.582 2632 146.626 199.44 1234.5 725.893 219.457
6 1202 1451 110.13 584.959 3158 175.788 239.162 1481.5 870.713 263.231
7 1402 1693 128.339 682.336 3684 204.95 278.884 1728.5 1015.5 307.005
8 1602 1935 146.548 779.713 4210 234.112 318.606 1975.5 1160.4 350.779
9 1802 2177 164.757 877.09 4736 263.274 358.328 2222.5 1305.2 394.553
10 2002 2419 182.966 974.467 5262 292.436 398.05 2469.5 1450 438.327
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image
Details are in the caption following the image

5. Conclusion

This work focusses on the study of polysaccharides known as guar gum and its chemical derivatives HPG, CMG, and CMHPG. Initially, polysaccharides under the study are modelled as molecular graphs, and vertex, edge partitions are determined. Ten degree-based topological indices, namely, Zagreb indices, Randic index, general Randic index, forgotten index, ABC index, GA index, GH index, Sombor index, and SS index are computed for the above said molecular graphs. It is observed that, even though the molecular structure of the derivatives of guar gum HPG and CMG are different, graph models of these structures remain the same with respect to the vertex and edge partitions. The graphical comparisons of four molecular structures for ten degree-based topological indices are made. The polysaccharide is a class of biopolymers which contributes various applications mainly in food storage, pharmaceutical industry, and petroleum extraction. This work benefits many researchers to study in the field of chemistry and pharmacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are cited at relevant places within the text as references.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.