Volume 2022, Issue 1 5333930
Research Article
Open Access

Thermophysical Studies of Chlorpheniramine with 1-Propanol at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the Atmospheric Pressure

Sampandam Elangovan

Corresponding Author

Sampandam Elangovan

Department of Physics, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte 395, Ethiopia wollegauniversity.edu.et

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 May 2022
Academic Editor: Elena Gomez

Abstract

A binary liquid system that consists of chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol is prepared at various concentrations by the mole fraction method. The density (ρ), viscosity (η), and ultrasonic velocity (U) of the system are observed at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K. From the experimental observations, various thermophysical parameters such as adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (Lf), free volume (Vf), viscous relaxation time (τ), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) are determined. The deviations of the excess parameters (βE, , , τE, and ΔGE) from their ideal values are calculated. The excess values are fitted with the Redlich–Kister polynomial function, and the corresponding coefficients are derived. Moreover, the standard deviations of the excess parameters are evaluated. The experimental and theoretical data confirmed the existence of hydrogen bonding interactions among the functional groups of the liquid mixture. The strength of intermolecular interactions decreased with increasing the temperature of the mixture. The strength of intermolecular interaction is noticed as 303 K > 308 K > 313 K.

1. Introduction

Intermolecular interactions between binary and ternary liquid mixtures are taking a vital role in the thrust area of theoretical and applied research [13]. The intermolecular interactions depend upon various intermolecular forces acting between the molecules present in the liquid system. Moreover, the change in temperature of the solutions leads to a significant change in the bonding and intermolecular forces among the dipoles [4, 5]. The measurement of ultrasonic velocity and related parameters is useful to analyse the strength of the intermolecular interactions between the liquid mixtures [68]. Furthermore, the interaction between the solute and solvent at various concentrations can be analysed by the experimental observations of the density (ρ), viscosity (η), and ultrasonic velocity (U) of the system. The adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (Lf), free volume (Vf), viscous relaxation time (τ), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) can also be theoretically calculated by using the experimental data. The significant changes in those parameters are used to analyse the types of interactions between the functional groups present in the liquid system. The excess parameters that are deviated from their ideal values have also directed to the formation of bonding between the liquid mixtures. Manukonda et al. [9] reported changes in thermophysical changes of the N, N-dimethylaniline and 1-alkanols system. Preeti et al. [10] analysed the changes in the intermolecular interactions between acetonitrile with some alkyl methacrylates at various temperatures. Chlorpheniramine is one of the pharmaceutical valuable compounds. It takes part in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, cough, and the common cold [11]. In general, the interactions of alcohols respond to the temperature of the system. 1-Propanol has self-associative and polar nature. It can be used as a proton donor compound as well as a solvent [12]. The present work is an attempt to study the nature and strength of intermolecular interactions between chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K. Redlich–Kister polynomial function and standard deviations are also used to validate the experimental and theoretical observations.

2. Materials

The mole fraction method is adopted to prepare the various concentrations of the liquid mixtures. The airtight standard flasks are used to hold the solutions. Digital electronic balance (ACM-78094L, ACMAS Ltd., India) with the accuracy of ±1 mg was used to determine the mass of the liquid components. Specific gravity bottle and Ostwald’s viscometer are used to determine the density and viscosity of the solutions with the accuracy of ±0.01 kg/m3 and ±0.001 Ns/m2, respectively. A single frequency 2 MHz ultrasonic interferometer (Mittal Enterprises, India) with the accuracy of ±1 m/s is used to measure the ultrasonic velocity. The double distilled water is used to standardize the density, viscosity, and ultrasonic velocity measurements. AR grade chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol (purity mass fraction >0.99, S. D. Fine Chemicals, India) were used without further purification. The density, viscosity, and ultrasonic velocity of the pure liquids are compared with the available literature [13, 14] and given in Table 1. A constant temperature bath (INSREF model IRI-016C, India) with the accuracy of ±0.01 K is used to sustain the temperature of the solutions.

1. Comparison of density, viscosity, and ultrasonic velocity of pure chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the atmospheric pressure.
S. no. Liquid Temperature (K) (ρ) kg/m3 (η)/10−3 N s/m2 (U) m/s Reference
Expt Lit Expt Lit Expt Lit
1 Chlorpheniramine 303 1260 1264.7 2.791 2.055 1820 1819 [13]
308 1257 1257.9 2.201 2.1949 1786 1786
313 1250 1250.1 1.980 2.3750 1766 1765
2 1-Propanol 303 752 752.2 1.095 1.0948 1194 1194 [14]
308 751 751.3 0.920 0.9187 1192 1192
313 750 750.1 0.744 0.7426 1190 1191

3. Methods

Various parameters were calculated using the standard relations.
(1)
where d is the distance moved by the reflector and n is the number of oscillations produced by the ultrasonic interferometer [15].
(2)
where f is the frequency of the ultrasonic wave.
(3)
where ρ represents the density of the liquid mixture.
(4)
where KT is a temperature-dependent constant and is given as
(5)
where Meff is the effective molecular weight and K is a temperature-independent constant [16].
(6)
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and h is Planck’s constant.
Excess parameters have been calculated using the following relation [17]:
(7)
where Ai represents any acoustical parameter and xi is the corresponding mole fraction.
(8)
where x1, x2  are the mole fractions, M1, M2 are the molar masses, ρ1,  ρ2  are the densities of the chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol, respectively, and ρM is the density of the mixture.
The excess parameters were fitted with the Redlich–Kister [18] equation given as follows:
(9)
The standard deviations were calculated using the following relation:
(10)
where N signifies the number of experimental points, k denotes the number of coefficients, Ai represents any acoustical parameter, and xi is the corresponding mole fraction. In the mixtures, x1 and x2 represent the mole fraction of chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol, respectively.

4. Results and Discussion

The density (ρ), viscosity (η), and ultrasonic velocity (U) of chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol are measured at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K. Furthermore, adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (Lf), free volume (Vf), viscous relaxation time (τ), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) are evaluated at various concentrations.

The observed significant changes in these parameters at various temperatures with the mole fraction of chlorpheniramine in the 1-propanol medium are given in Table 2. It is noted that the density of the liquid mixture increased with increasing chlorpheniramine concentration. It leads to the structure maker of the solute to the chosen solvent. This trend may also suggest the increasing solute-solvent interactions with chlorpheniramine concentrations. The shrinkage of chlorpheniramine molecules makes the solution in higher density comparisons than that of 1-propanol. The viscosity reflects the same trend as in the density effect of the solution. While increasing the temperature from 303 K to 313 K, both these parameters decreased. It may suggest the dissociation of the molecular clusters in the mixture. In general, the ultrasonic velocity increases with the active interaction of the solute-solvent system [19]. In the present study, the ultrasonic velocity increases with the chlorpheniramine concentrations, as shown in Figure 1. At the entire concentration, the ultrasonic velocities linearly vary with the mixing of 1-propanol. However, while increasing the temperature, the resonant wavelength of the ultrasonic wave in the solution decreased at the constant ultrasonic frequency. The corresponding changes in ultrasonic velocity with the chlorpheniramine concentrations reveal the existence of intermolecular interactions between the functional groups present in the liquid system. In general, the adiabatic compressibility is inversely proportional to the ultrasonic velocity and density. In this work, both the density and ultrasonic velocity increase with the chlorpheniramine concentration. The adiabatic compressibility decreases with increasing chlorpheniramine concentration. The decreasing trend of adiabatic compressibility signifies an increase in electrostrictive compression. After mixing chlorpheniramine with 1-propanol, the free length (Lf) decreased. In this study, the values of free length are inversely proportional to the ultrasonic velocity data. This result follows the Kincaid model [20].

2. Various data of chlorpheniramine (x1) and 1-propanol (x2) at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the atmospheric pressure.
x1 Ρ (kg/m3) η/10−3 (Ns/m2) U (m/s) Β/10−10 (m2/N) Lf/10−10 (m) Vf/10−11 (m3/mol) τ/10−12 (s) ΔG (kJ/mol)
T = 303 K
 0.0000 752 1.095 1194 9.327 0.634 0.598 1.358 5.406
 0.1203 808 1.283 1264 7.746 0.578 0.877 1.322 5.340
 0.2065 865 1.472 1333 6.506 0.529 1.035 1.274 5.249
 0.3165 920 1.659 1402 5.529 0.488 1.267 1.220 5.135
 0.4077 977 1.847 1472 4.723 0.451 1.436 1.160 5.015
 0.5489 1032 2.034 1541 4.080 0.419 1.761 1.104 4.888
 0.6382 1088 2.223 1610 3.545 0.391 1.918 1.048 4.756
 0.7291 1145 2.398 1679 3.098 0.365 2.101 0.988 4.605
 0.8216 1201 2.599 1750 2.718 0.342 2.260 0.940 4.479
 0.9326 1256 2.787 1818 2.408 0.322 2.488 0.893 4.352
 1.0000 1260 2.791 1820 2.396 0.321 2.697 0.889 4.340
T = 308 K
 0.0000 751 0.92 1192 9.371 0.641 0.774 1.147 5.105
 0.1203 807 1.062 1259 7.817 0.585 1.157 1.104 5.009
 0.2065 863 1.198 1325 6.600 0.538 1.397 1.052 4.882
 0.3165 920 1.346 1390 5.625 0.497 1.711 1.007 4.774
 0.4077 975 1.501 1456 4.838 0.461 1.928 0.966 4.666
 0.5489 1032 1.632 1521 4.188 0.428 2.402 0.909 4.509
 0.6382 1087 1.772 1587 3.652 0.400 2.638 0.861 4.371
 0.7291 1142 1.915 1653 3.204 0.375 2.876 0.816 4.238
 0.8216 1199 2.056 1720 2.819 0.352 3.129 0.771 4.088
 0.9326 1254 2.198 1782 2.511 0.332 3.448 0.734 3.967
 1.0000 1257 2.201 1786 2.494 0.331 3.744 0.730 3.949
T = 313 K
 0.0000 750 0.744 1190 9.415 0.648 1.062 0.932 4.690
 0.1203 805 0.882 1253 7.912 0.594 1.518 0.928 4.684
 0.2065 861 1.019 1317 6.696 0.547 1.765 0.907 4.623
 0.3165 915 1.158 1380 5.738 0.506 2.121 0.884 4.551
 0.4077 972 1.297 1444 4.934 0.469 2.371 0.851 4.455
 0.5489 1025 1.436 1508 4.290 0.438 2.873 0.819 4.358
 0.6382 1081 1.573 1572 3.743 0.409 3.110 0.783 4.238
 0.7291 1135 1.712 1635 3.295 0.383 3.347 0.750 4.130
 0.8216 1191 1.849 1699 2.908 0.360 3.602 0.715 4.003
 0.9326 1246 1.987 1763 2.582 0.339 3.947 0.682 3.883
 1.0000 1250 1.980 1766 2.565 0.338 4.315 0.675 3.853
Details are in the caption following the image

It is observed that the free volume (Vf) of the system increased with increasing temperature as well as the concentration of chlorpheniramine. It may be due to the dispersive forces acting on the molecules and signify the dissociation of the bonds in the mixture. Furthermore, increasing the temperature of the solution weakened the intermolecular interactions between the proton donor and acceptor functional groups present in the liquid system. The viscous relaxation time decreased with the increasing mole fraction of chlorpheniramine at the entire range of temperatures. It suggested the rupture in the molecular cluster of the liquid system. The significant changes in the Gibbs free energy with the chlorpheniramine concentration are shown in Figure 2. The plot signifies the decreasing Gibbs free energy with increasing temperature and chlorpheniramine. It confirmed that solute-solvent interaction occurs and reveals the corresponding changes in the equilibrium states and the existence of specific weak hydrogen bonding interaction (N-H…O-H) between the molecules in the liquid system.

Details are in the caption following the image

The sign and deviation of the excess parameters from their ideal values are useful to analyse the nature and strength of the intermolecular interactions. Fort et al. [21] reported that the negative excess parameters raised due to the existence of hydrogen bonding in the intermolecular interactions and positive values lead to weak interactions between the unlike functional group constituents in the system.

The variations of excess adiabatic compressibility (βE), excess free length (), excess free volume (), excess viscous relaxation time (τE), excess Gibbs free energy (ΔGE), and excess molar volume are given in Table 3.

3. Excess values of chlorpheniramine with 1-propanol at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the atmospheric pressure.
x1 βE/10−10 (m2/N) /10−11 (m) /10−8 (m3/mol−1) τE/10−12 (s) ΔGE (kJ/mol) /10−6 (m3/mol)
T = 303 K
 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
 0.1203 −0.261 −0.048 −0.081 −0.018 −0.247 0.977
 0.2065 −0.538 −0.123 −0.191 −0.063 −0.523 1.223
 0.3165 −0.795 −0.196 −0.300 −0.106 −0.781 1.547
 0.4077 −1.022 −0.263 −0.406 −0.144 −1.007 1.479
 0.5489 −1.199 −0.318 −0.501 −0.176 −1.185 1.660
 0.6382 −1.306 −0.357 −0.576 −0.197 −1.292 1.302
 0.7291 −1.308 −0.367 −0.611 −0.201 −1.294 0.850
 0.8216 −1.151 −0.331 −0.575 −0.178 −1.137 0.345
 0.9326 −0.752 −0.216 −0.404 −0.111 −0.738 0.151
 1.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 308 K
 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
 0.1203 −0.271 −0.051 −0.103 −0.013 −0.257 0.974
 0.2065 −0.557 −0.128 −0.236 −0.053 −0.542 1.232
 0.3165 −0.824 −0.203 −0.369 −0.092 −0.809 1.524
 0.4077 −1.057 −0.271 −0.497 −0.126 −1.043 1.483
 0.5489 −1.242 −0.328 −0.612 −0.155 −1.227 1.627
 0.6382 −1.353 −0.368 −0.702 −0.174 −1.339 1.282
 0.7291 −1.355 −0.378 −0.746 −0.177 −1.340 0.859
 0.8216 −1.192 −0.340 −0.703 −0.156 −1.178 0.333
 0.9326 −0.779 −0.223 −0.496 −0.097 −0.765 0.167
 1.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
T = 313 K
 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
 0.1203 −0.281 −0.053 −0.129 −0.009 −0.267 0.976
 0.2065 −0.577 −0.133 −0.289 −0.046 −0.563 1.226
 0.3165 −0.852 −0.210 −0.448 −0.080 −0.838 1.554
 0.4077 −1.094 −0.280 −0.601 −0.112 −1.079 1.473
 0.5489 −1.284 −0.340 −0.740 −0.137 −1.269 1.672
 0.6382 −1.398 −0.380 −0.848 −0.154 −1.383 1.300
 0.7291 −1.398 −0.390 −0.901 −0.157 −1.384 0.884
 0.8216 −1.231 −0.351 −0.849 −0.139 −1.216 0.363
 0.9326 −0.805 −0.231 −0.601 −0.084 −0.790 0.149
 1.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

In this study, the above parameters show negative signs. The negative excess adiabatic compressibility (βE) values are progressively increased and decayed with the increasing concentration of chlorpheniramine, as shown in Figure 3. The negative values slightly decrease with an increase in the entire range of temperature. Moreover, the negative excess compressibility (βE) increased up to a critical concentration (x1, 0.5), decreasing in the 1-propanol medium. This trend suggested that the dissociation of dipoles increased in 1-propanol rich concentrations. Furthermore, the nonlinear variations in the excess free volume () also suggested that the strength of intermolecular interaction increased with the increasing mole fraction of chlorpheniramine. The excess viscous relaxation time (τE) and excess Gibbs energy (ΔGE) also supported the experimental observations. The excess free molar volume increase with 1-propanol concentrations and decrease with increasing chlorpheniramine molecules. Furthermore, the positive signifies dispersive force acting on the mixture. It leads to dissociation in order to increase 1-propanol concentrations. The changes in excess parameters reveal the polynomial curve. Therefore, the Redlich–Kister polynomial coefficients and the standard deviation of the theoretical data are also calculated and given in Table 4. The standard deviation values validated the theoretical calculation of these excess parameters.

Details are in the caption following the image
4. Redlich–Kister coefficients and standard deviations of chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the atmospheric pressure.
Parameters Temperature (K) a0 a1 a2 σ
βE/10−10 (m2/N) 303 −0.454 0.328 −0.214 0.049
308 −0.324 −0.312 −0.096 0.045
313 −0.324 0.402 −0.103 0.046
/10−11 (m) 303 −1.010 0.481 0.180 0.062
308 −0.772 0.177 0.202 0.049
313 −1.170 0.520 0.308 0.063
/10−8 (m3/mol) 303 −0.255 −0.625 0.542 0.051
308 −0.309 −1.005 0.973 0.057
313 −0.341 −1.463 1.397 0.065
τE/10−12 (s) 303 −0.093 −0.111 −0.133 0.048
308 −0.027 −0.089 −0.220 0.052
313 0.027 −0.034 −0.329 0.047
ΔGE (kJ/mol) 303 −2.034 1.120 0.570 0.055
308 0.082 0.438 −0.856 0.048
313 0.332 −2.146 −2.424 0.062
/10−6 (m3/mol) 303 0.134 2.825 1.836 0.134
308 1.974 0.815 1.373 0.683
313 0.137 0.2068 1.434 0.8545

5. Conclusion

The density (ρ), viscosity (η), and ultrasonic velocity (U) of chlorpheniramine with 1-propanol were measured at 303 K, 308 K, and 313 K in the atmospheric pressure. Using the experimental data, adiabatic compressibility (β), free length (Lf), free volume (Vf), viscous relaxation time (τ), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) are derived. These parameters significantly vary with the temperature and concentrations of the solute-solvent in the liquid system. The deviations of these parameters from the ideal values are also calculated. The systematic observation reveals that the presence of hydrogen bonding interaction between the amine group and hydroxyl group existed in chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol, respectively. Redlich–Kister coefficients and standard deviations are also supporting the legitimacy of the observations. The experimental and theoretical calculations confirmed the existence of intermolecular interaction between chlorpheniramine and 1-propanol. The strength of the interaction is found greater in the higher chlorpheniramine concentrations. The dissociation is observed in 1-propanol concentrations. Furthermore, while increasing the temperature, the strength of the intermolecular interaction decreased and was found in the order of 303 K > 308 K > 313 K.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to the Department of Physics, Research and Technology Transfer Centre, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia (WU/S1/108), for their support by providing necessary facilities to complete this work.

    Data Availability

    The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.