Volume 2019, Issue 1 4734606
Case Report
Open Access

Endometrioma of the Liver: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Prachi Rana

Corresponding Author

Prachi Rana

Department of Internal Medicine, Los Angeles County Hospital/University of Southern California, USA usc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Shida Haghighat

Shida Haghighat

Department of Internal Medicine, Los Angeles County Hospital/University of Southern California, USA usc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Hyosun Han

Hyosun Han

Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Los Angeles County Hospital/University of Southern California, USA usc.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 June 2019
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Melanie Deutsch

Abstract

Hepatic endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis first described by Finkel in 1986. A thorough review of the literature revealed 28 cases of hepatic endometriosis. This unusual condition offers several diagnostic challenges due to its variable appearance on imaging and need for histologic analysis to establish a definitive diagnosis. We present a 42-year-old female initially treated for presumed hydatid cyst that was later found to be endometriosis in the liver. The case highlights the importance of considering endometriosis in the differential for a patient presenting with a solitary liver mass regardless of age and previous history of endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity. It is a benign condition most commonly noted in the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and local pelvic peritoneum. Atypical endometriosis, when the condition is found in extrapelvic regions, is rare [1]. While uncommon, atypical endometriosis has been described in remote sites including the GI tract, diaphragm, skin, lung, pleura, kidney, and pancreas. The only organ in the abdomen that is refractory to endometriosis is the spleen [2].

Hepatic endometriosis is one of the most rare forms of extrapelvic endometriosis, first described in 1986 [3]. Only 28 cases have been reported in the English literature. We herein present the 29th case of hepatic endometriosis, a 42-year-old female initially treated for presumed hydatid cyst that was later found to be endometriosis in the liver. This rare condition offers several diagnostic challenges. We offer an exhaustive review of the literature focusing on advances in the clinical manifestation, patient characteristics, pathogenesis, and diagnostic workup of the condition.

2. Case Presentation

A 42-year-old multiparous woman presented with episodic, severe right upper quadrant pain associated with nausea and vomiting. Her past surgical history included a hysterectomy and left oophorectomy for unclear reasons. Several months prior she presented to another hospital for similar symptoms and was diagnosed with a hepatic mass. Physical examination demonstrated right upper quadrant tenderness without any palpable masses. Liver function and viral serologies for hepatitis B and C were normal. Tumor markers demonstrated normal CA 19-9 and AFP, with mildly elevated CA-125 40 U/mL (normal <38U/mL).

Computed tomography with intravenous contrast showed a 3.2cm x 4cm x 1.8cm multiseptated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe and an ill-defined heterogeneous hyperdensity within the peripheral right hepatic lobe measuring 3cm x 1.3cm (Figure 1). Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of the left hepatic lesion were inconclusive.

Details are in the caption following the image
Computed tomography showing 3.2 x 4.0 x 1.8 cm multiseptated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe.

Further workup revealed a positive Echinococcal IgG antibody and she was started on Albendazole for a presumed hydatid cyst. After completion of therapy, she was scheduled for complete left lateral hepatic resection. However, she presented again several weeks later with progressive right upper quadrant pain. At this time repeat computed tomography redemonstrated the left hepatic mass which was unchanged in size but did not show the right hepatic lesion. Imaging also revealed a new pericardial effusion that was not present on previous imaging (Figure 2). Her liver tests were the following: AST 485 U/L (normal 10-40 U/L), ALT 308 U/L (normal 5-40 U/L), ALP 50 U/L (normal 35-104 U/L), and total bilirubin 0.5 mg/dL (normal <1.0 mg/dL). Given the concern for pericardial involvement, she urgently underwent a laparoscopic left partial hepatectomy (segment II and partial segment III). The postoperative course was uneventful. Final pathology was consistent with hepatic endometriosis (Figures 3 and 4). After 2 months of follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and liver tests normalized. She was started on medroxyprogesterone acetate and remains well to date.

Details are in the caption following the image
Computed tomography showing small pericardial effusion.
Details are in the caption following the image
Low-power view of the interface between an endometriotic nodule and liver parenchyma. Notice the large endometrial type glands surrounded by endometrial type stroma in the superior portion of the image. These are separated from the liver parenchyma (lower right portion) by a band of fibrosis. The liver parenchyma displays macrovesicular steatosis. Hematoxylin & Eosin, 40x.
Details are in the caption following the image
High-power view of an endometriotic nodule. Endometrioid type glands of varying shape and size show characteristic columnar lining, within a cellular endometrial type stroma. The inset shows a portal tract for comparison (from top to bottom: vein, artery, bile ducts); notice the small round shape of the bile ducts and lack of cellular stroma. Hematoxylin & Eosin, 200x.

3. Discussion

Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disease characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside of the uterus. It affects 5-15% of women of reproductive age. Pelvic endometriosis involves the ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterine ligaments, Pouch of Douglas, and surrounding peritoneum [4]. A more rare form of endometriosis, extrapelvic, includes involvement of gastrointestinal tract, urinary system, thoracic cavity, kidneys, and pancreas. The exact prevalence of extrapelvic endometriosis is unknown but is thought to present in an older population with a median age of 34-40 years [4].

There is no clear consensus or unifying theory of the exact pathophysiology of extrapelvic endometriosis. Several theories have been proposed; however no theory alone accounts for the development of extrapelvic endometriosis, suggesting a multifactorial nature to the disease.

The classic theory of retrograde menstruation proposes that reflux of endometrial fragments through the fallopian tubes during menstruation results in implantation of the peritoneal cavity. Though retrograde menstruation is a common phenomenon seen in up to 90% of healthy women, not all of these women develop extrapelvic endometriosis [5].

The coelomic metaplasia theory suggests that endometriosis develops from metaplasia of the peritoneal epithelium possibly due to environmental or genetic factors [5, 6]. The induction theory suggests that defects in embryogenesis give rise to endometrial like tissue. The Müllerian ducts give rise to the female genitourinary tract. In males, this structure dissolves under the influence of anti-Müllerian hormone. However remnants of this structure may persist and differentiate later in life into endometriotic like tissue due to the presence of excesses in endogenous or exogenous estrogen as is seen in men with chronic liver disease and prostate cancer [5, 7].

While these theories account for endometriosis within the peritoneal and pelvic cavity and provide some insight into its pathogenesis in men, they do not account for the cases of disseminated endometriosis seen in cases of lymph nodes, thoracic cavity, and liver involvement, as seen in our patient. Whether these original cells originate in the uterus or the peritoneal cavity, the theory that endometriotic tissue disseminates through lymphatic spread offers a plausible explanation for the manifestation of hepatic endometriosis [5].

A thorough review of the literature revealed 28 cases of hepatic endometriosis. Our report adds one case to this rare clinical finding; herein we present the twenty-ninth case of hepatic endometriosis. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the previously reported cases and ours, comparing the presentation, imaging, treatment, and pathologic features. In this review, the patient age ranged from 21 to 62 years, with a mean of 41.5 years. Of the 19 cases that reported parity, ten were nulligravid and nine were either uni- or multiparous, thus demonstrating that pregnancy and childbirth have no bearing on hepatic endometriosis. Six of 29 (21%) patients were postmenopausal, thus showing this condition is not limited to women of reproductive age and that the diagnosis should be considered in postmenopausal women. Twelve of 29 (41%) had a prior history of endometriosis; thus the diagnosis should not be limited only to patients with a known history of endometriosis. A significant portion of these patients had prior abdominopelvic surgery—at least half (51%) had prior pelvic surgery, and 41% had a hysterectomy, suggesting that endometrial tissue seeding during surgery later resulted in the development of hepatic endometriosis. The majority (90%) of patients described in the literature had epigastric or right upper quadrant pain; only two patients complained of characteristic cyclic pain related to menses. Only three patients were asymptomatic and their condition was diagnosed incidentally. In one peculiar case, however, the patient presented with flu-like symptoms and right shoulder pain, misdiagnosed as pneumonia initially [8].

Table 1. Patient characteristics, presentation, and treatment of case reports of hepatic endometriosis.
Author, Year Age Parity Pre/Post-Menopausal Prior Pelvic Surgery Hysterectomy History of Endometriosis Symptoms Method of Diagnosis Treatment
Asran, 2010 61 Unknown Post Salpingo-oophorectomy Yes Yes Post prandial epigastric pain CT guided percutaneous liver biopsy N/A
Bouras, 2013 35 Nulliparous Pre No No No Recurrent, intermittent epigastric pain Surgery L lateral hepatic sectionectomy by laparotomy
Chung, 1998 40 Multiparous Pre L ovarian cystectomy No Yes Asymptomatic Surgery Cyst enucleation
De Riggi, 2016 27 Nulliparous Pre No No No Painless abdominal mass Surgery L hepatectomy by laparotomy
Finkel, 1986 21 Uniparous Pre L fallopian tube cyst removal No No Episodic sharp, epigastric pain associated with nausea and vomiting not related to menses Surgery Cyst enucleation + Danazol
Fluegen, 2013 32 Nulliparous Pre No No No RUQ pain Surgery Ultrasonic pericystectomy
Goldsmith, 2009 48 Nulliparous N/A Salpingo-oophorectomy Yes Yes Relapsing/remitting chronic RUQ pain Surgery Nonanatomic resection, laparotomy, ultrasonic cyst aspiration
Groves, 2003 52 N/A N/A Oophorectomy Yes No RUQ pain Surgery R hepatectomy
Hertel, 2012 44 N/A N/A Oophorectomy Partial no Sudden onset upper abdominal pain Surgery Partial hepatectomy
Huang, 2002 56 N/A Post Salpingo-oophorectomy Yes Yes Intermittent epigastric pain not associated with menses Surgery L hepatic lobectomy by laparotomy
Inal, 2000 25 N/A Pre No No Yes Pelvic pain, mass and rectal hemorrhage Percutaneous CT guided biopsy Danazol
Jelovsek, 2004 52 Uniparous Post Salpingo-oophorectomy Yes Yes Flu like symptoms, pleuritic chest pain Surgery Leuprolide, then resection via laparotomy
Keramidaris, 2018 40 Multiparous Pre No No No Asymptomatic, incidental Surgery Cystectomy by laparotomy
Khan, 2002 31 N/A N/A Hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy Yes Yes Malaise, abdominal distention Surgery R hepatectomy + goserelin
Khan, 2002 61 N/A Post No No Yes RUQ pain Surgery R hepatectomy
Liu, 2015 36 Uniparous Pre No No No RUQ pain prior to menstruation Surgery Pericystectomy
N′Senda, 2002 54 Uniparous Post Hysterectomy, oophorectomy Yes No RUQ pain for 1 year Surgery Right hepatectomy by thoracolaparotomy
Nezhat, 2005 (1) 36 Nulliparous N/A No No No Cyclic epigastric pain for 1 year Surgery Cyst removal by CO2 laser laparoscopically
Nezhat, 2005 (2) 30 Nulliparous N/A No No Yes Chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and painful bowel movements Surgery Laparoscopic removal of liver mass
Reid, 2003 46 Nulliparous N/A Oophorectomy Yes yes RUQ pain Surgery R hepatectomy + goserelin
Rivkine, 2013 51 Multiparous N/A Hysterectomy Yes no Epigastric pain, vomiting Surgery L lobectomy by laparotomy
Roesch-Dietlan, 2011 25 Nulliparous Pre No No No Relapsing/remitting RUQ pain Surgery Incidentally found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treated with danazol
Rovati, 1990 37 Nulliparous Pre No No Yes Chronic, acyclic epigastric pain Surgery Segmentectomy by laparotomy + Danazol
Schuld, 2011 39 Uniparous Pre No No No RUQ pain, cough Surgery Segmentectomy, transdiaphragmatic pulmonary wedge resection
Sherif, 2016 44 N/A Pre Hysterectomy Yes Yes RUQ pain and vomiting CT guided core biopsy Segmentectomy
Tuech, 2003 42 Nulliparous N/A No No No Chronic, acyclic epigastric pain Surgery Deroofing & cystectomy
Verbeke, 1996 (1) 34 N/A Pre No No No Acute abdomen Surgery R hemihepatectomy
Verbeke, 1996 (2) 62 N/A Post Yes No No RUQ pain Surgery Cholecystectomy, L hepatectomy
Rana, 2019 42 Multiparous Pre Hysterectomy, L oophorectomy Yes No Severe RUQ pain, N/V Surgery L partial hepatectomy
Table 2. Imaging features of case reports of hepatic endometriosis.
Author, Year US CT MRI
Asran, 2010 N/A Multiple, irregularly shaped, heterogeneous, low density lesions scattered throughout the liver N/A
Bouras, 2013 N/A 10cm cystic lesion with a fatty component and calcifications 10cm cystic lesion with a fatty component and calcifications
Chung, 1998 6.4 cm x 3 cm x 2.5 cm septated cyst Low density hepatic cyst, with undulating wall but no obvious septations N/A
De Riggi, 2016 N/A 30cm hepatic cyts in the L love reaching segments IV, V, VIII
Finkel, 1986 12.5 x12x9.5 cm cystic mass in L lobe with possible septations 12cm smooth-walled cystic lesion without septations N/A
Fluegen, 2013 N/A N/A 9.5cm x 12cm lobulated cyst in segments IV, V, VIII
Goldsmith, 2009 9 x 11cm cystic mass in segment IV. The wall appeared thick with complex septae. N/A 11 x13 cm cystic mass in segments IV and VIII with incomplete septations
Groves, 2003 Bilateral lesions, largest in R posterior lobe 12 x 9cm N/A N/A
Hertel, 2012 N/A N/A 9.5x9.1x11.2cm cystic mass with a thickened wall in R hepatic lobe
Huang, 2002 N/A 9x6cm well circumscribed cystic mass with irregular soft tissue components N/A
Inal, 2000 Round, well defined and heterogeneous including anechoic cystic and echogenic solid components with septations and solid components Round, well circumscribed heterogeneous mass with septations. Fine punctate/nodular calcifications at the periphery of the lesion A lobulated but well-demarcated subcapsular mass in the posterior segment of R lobe of the liver
Jelovsek, 2004 N/A 11 x7cm mass N/A
Keramidaris, 2018 Large cystic lesion between L and R lobe of the liver none Multiseptated cystic lesion 10.3x7.8x7.7 cm in the L lobe, segments IV, II, III
Khan, 2002 Large mass in R lobe and small in L lobe large non-enhancing lobulated mass in R lobe and mass in L lobe; portal vein thrombosis N/A
Khan, 2002 N/A Large mass occupying the entire R lobe N/A
Liu, 2015 6 cm lesion in L lobe (segment III) 6.5 x6cm loculated cystic lesion in segment III, wall with thick complex septae N/A
N′Senda, 2002 N/A Huge heterogeneous hypodense mass partially enhanced after contrast injection; cystic changes w/ fluid levels Heterogeneous mass on both T1-, T2- and T1-weighted image after gadolinium injection; cystic changes w/ fluid levels
Nezhat, 2005 (1) 3-cm hepatic cyst in the far caudal aspect of the right lobe of the liver 3-cm hepatic cyst in the far caudal aspect of the right lobe of the liver N/A
Nezhat, 2005 (2) Normal findings N/A Normal findings
Reid, 2003 10cm mass with echogenic margins and internal debris Low density lesion N/A
Rivkine, 2013 80 x 75 mm intraparenchymal hepatic necrotic tumor Hypovascularized, cystic mass in the L liver lobe with hemorrhagic contents, no septations Cystic mass in segments II and III
Roesch-Dietlan, 2011 No masses, multiple small gallstones N/A N/A
Rovati, 1990 10cm cystic mass with septations Multilocular 10cm cyst with fine calcifications in the wall N/A
Schuld, 2011 N/A N/A 6.8 x2.3 cm in diameter in the right basal lung and peripheral bile ducts
Sherif, 2016 3cm complex cyst in R lobes 3cm well defined hypodense subcapsular lesion in R lobe with heterogeneous peripheral enhancement in the venous and delayed phases Subcapsular partially cystic focal lesion with possible hemorrhagic content and heterogeneous peripheral enhancement
Tuech, 2003 N/A 24cm smooth walled cystic lesion without septations in the R lobe N/A
Verbeke, 1996 (1) N/A Cystic tumor in R lobe of liver, with reactive enlargement of L hepatic lobe Cystic tumor in R lobe of liver, with reactive enlargement of L hepatic lobe
Verbeke, 1996 (2) Cyst (12 x 10 x 7.5 cm) in the left liver lobe, located near the gallbladder and the liver hilus, which partially compressed the proximal ductus choledochus. Cyst (12 x 10 x 7.5 cm) in the left liver lobe, located near the gallbladder and the liver hilus, which partially compressed the proximal ductus choledochus. N/A
Rana 2019 N/A 3.2cm x 4cm x 1.8cm multi-septated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe N/A

Abdominal US, CT, and MRI are the imaging modalities most frequently used. Typical US findings include well-defined cystic masses with solid components and septations. The majority of CT reports show low density, heterogenous cystic lesions that are either nonenhancing or poorly enhancing. Calcifications have been reported along with irregular soft tissue components but can be variable. Finally, MRI usually demonstrates signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, similar to that of normal endometrium. However, because endometrial implants can exhibit various degrees of hemorrhage due to hormonal stimulation, implants may demonstrate a spectrum of appearances depending on the age of the hemorrhage but can be variable [9].

Of the 19 cases that reported lab values, 79% had normal liver tests. Three cases exhibited mild transaminitis, and a fourth case, ours, had markedly elevated transaminases with AST 485 U/L and ALT 305 U/L.

Excluding two, all patients underwent surgery for treatment. The most common surgery was hepatectomy via laparotomy (59%). Other surgical techniques included ultrasonic cyst manipulation. In the two nonsurgical cases, those patients were treated with danazol alone [9, 10]. Tumor size ranged from 1 to 30cm, with mean tumor size 9.8 cm.

The final diagnosis can only be made by histopathologic analysis. The differential diagnosis includes both benign and malignant conditions, as echinococcal cyst, abscess, hematoma, cystadenoma, and malignant cystic neoplasm, such as cystadenocarcinoma or metastatic disease. Method of diagnosis was largely by histologic analysis after surgery in 90% of cases. Only four patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsy prior to surgery, with only three yielding a diagnosis of endometriosis and one case, ours, yielding inconclusive results. Histopathologic examination of the tumors was consistent with endometriosis as evidenced largely by fibrous capsules with internal epithelial lining containing endometrial glands and stroma. Furthermore, although malignant transformation of endometriosis is a rare event, occurring commonly in the ovary, there were two cases of malignancy reported, one adenosarcoma and one low-grade endometrial stroma sarcoma [11, 12]. Of the eight cases that reported on immunostaining, all eight cases were positive for estrogen and progesterone receptor, consistent with endometriosis. Five cases reported on further immunohistochemistry markers that included CD10 (in endometrial tissue) and/or CK7 (in glandular tissue) [1317].

Hepatic endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis. This unusual condition offers several diagnostic challenges but should be considered in the differential in any female presenting with a solitary hepatic mass, regardless of age and previous history of endometriosis.

Consent

Verbal informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

Disclosure

Institutional Mailing Address: LAC + USC Medical Center, 1200 N. State St., CT A7D - GME, Los Angeles, CA 90033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Prachi Rana and Shida Haghighat equally contributed to the collection of the data and writing of the manuscript. Hyosun Han reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yangling Ma and Dr. Esteban Gnass for the review and interpretation of the pathologic reports.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.