Volume 2019, Issue 1 3849547
Erratum
Open Access

Erratum to “Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation”

Helder Pereira

Corresponding Author

Helder Pereira

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiac Rhythm Management Service, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Tom A. Jackson

Tom A. Jackson

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Simon Claridge

Simon Claridge

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan M. Behar

Jonathan M. Behar

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Cheng Yao

Cheng Yao

Medtronic Ltd, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Benjamin Sieniewicz

Benjamin Sieniewicz

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Justin Gould

Justin Gould

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Bradley Porter

Bradley Porter

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Baldeep Sidhu

Baldeep Sidhu

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Jaswinder Gill

Jaswinder Gill

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Steven Niederer

Steven Niederer

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, UK kcl.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher A. Rinaldi

Christopher A. Rinaldi

Cardiovascular Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK nhs.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 August 2019

In the article titled “Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation” [1], there was an error in Figure 5, where Figures 5(a) and 5(b) were duplicated, due to a production error. The corrected figure is shown below.

Details are in the caption following the image
VaT10-90 and TVaT values in each patient according to the VVD setting. LVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the left ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; RVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the right ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; SIM, intraventricular pacing interval with the right and left ventricles paced simultaneously; TVaT, total ventricular activation time; VaT10-90, ventricular activation time 10–90.
Details are in the caption following the image
VaT10-90 and TVaT values in each patient according to the VVD setting. LVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the left ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; RVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the right ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; SIM, intraventricular pacing interval with the right and left ventricles paced simultaneously; TVaT, total ventricular activation time; VaT10-90, ventricular activation time 10–90.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.