Volume 2013, Issue 1 928080
Research Article
Open Access

Extinction and Decay Estimates of Solutions for the p-Laplacian Equations with Nonlinear Absorptions and Nonlocal Sources

Xiulan Wu

Corresponding Author

Xiulan Wu

College of Mathematics, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, China jlnu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Jun Fu

Jun Fu

College of Mathematics, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, China jlnu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 August 2013
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Yanni Xiao

Abstract

We investigate the extinction and decay estimates of the p-Laplacian equations with nonlinear absorptions and nonlocal sources. By Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, we obtain the sufficient conditions of extinction solutions, and we also give the precise decay estimates of the extinction solutions.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we consider the following fast diffusive p-Laplacian equation:
()
()
where 1 < p < 2, k, q, λ > 0, 0 < r < 1, ΩRN (N ≥ 2) is a bounded domain with smooth boundary and is a nonnegative function. Equation (1) is a class of nonlinear singular parabolic equations and appears to be relevant in the theory of non-Newtonian fluids perturbed by both nonlocal sources and nonlinear absorptions; see [14], for instance. Extinction is the phenomenon whereby the evolution of some nontrivial initial data u0(x) produces a nontrivial solution u(x, t) in a time interval 0 < t < T and u(x, t) → 0 as tT. As an important property of solutions of developing equations, the extinction recently has been studied intensively by several authors in [59]. In paper [10], the authors discussed the extinction behavior of solutions for Problem (1)-(2) when r = 1. In this paper, we investigated the extinction of solutions when 0 < r < 1. Due to the nature of our problem, we would like to use the following lemmas by [11].

Lemma 1 (Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality). Suppose that β ≥ 0, N > p ≥ 1, β + 1 ≤ q ≤ (β + 1)Np/(Np); then for u such that |u|βuW1,p(Ω), one has

()
with θ = ((β + 1)r−1q−1)/(N−1p−1 + (β + 1)r−1), where C is a constant depending only on N, p, and r.

2. Main Results and Proofs

Theorem 2. Assume that p − 1 = q with r < 1; then the non-negative nontrivial weak solution of Problem (1)-(2) vanishes in finite time for any non-negative initial data provided that |Ω| or λ is sufficiently small.

  • (1)

    For the case  2N/(N + 2) ≤ p < 2, one has

    ()

  • where  k1,   M1, and  T1  are given by (11), (16), and (17), respectively.

  • (2)

    For the case  1 < p < 2N/(N + 2), one has

    ()

  • where  s,  k2,  M2, and  T2  are given by (18), (22), (26), and (28), respectively.

Proof. (1) For the case 2N/(N + 2) ≤ p < 2, multiplying (1) by u and integrating over Ω, we deduce from the Hölder inequality that

()
inequality
()
where B denotes the optimal embedding constant, combining (6) and (7) we have
()
By Lemma 1, we have
()
where θ1 = (1/(1 + r) − 1/2)(1/N − 1/p + 1/(1 + r)) −1.

It is easy to check that θ1 ∈ (0,1]; using Young′s inequality with ε, it follows from (9) that

()
where ε1 > 0 and k1 > 0 will be determined later. We choose
()
Then we can conclude that k1 ∈ (1,2) and pk1(1 − θ1)/(pk1θ1) = 1 + r. Therefore, it follows from (10) that
()

By combining (8) and (12), we have

()
Choosing ε1 small enough such that 1 − kε1/C(ε1) > 0 and |Ω | ≤ (1 − kε1/C(ε1))/λBp, then we have 1 − kε1/C(ε1) − Bpλ | Ω | > 0. Therefore, we deduce from k1 ∈ (1,2) that
()
which implies that
()
where
()
()
(2) For the case 1 < p < 2N/(N + 2), multiplying (1) by us, where
()
integrating over Ω, we deduce from the Hölder inequality that
()
By Lemma 1 and s > 1, we have
()
where θ2 = N(1 − r)(p + s − 1)/(s + 1)[p(s + r) + N(p − 1 − r)]. By (18) and r < 1, it is easy to check that θ2 ∈ (0,1). By Young′s inequality with ε, it follows from (19) that
()
where ε2 > 0 and k2 > 0 will be determined later. We choose
()
then it follows that k2 ∈ (s, s + 1) and (p + s − 1)k2(1 − θ2)/(p + s − 1 − k2θ2) = s + r. Therefore, it follows from (21) that
()

By combining (19) and (23), we have by poincare inequality

()
Choosing ε2 > 0 small enough such that spp/(p + s − 1) pkε2/C(ε2) > 0 and |Ω | ≤ (spp/(p + s − 1) pkε2/C(ε2))/λ | Ω | Bp, then we have spp/(p + s − 1) pkε2/C(ε2) − λ | Ω | Bp > 0. Therefore, we deduce from k2 ∈ (s, s + 1) that
()
where
()
which implies that
()
where
()
The proof of Theorem 2 is complete.

Theorem 3. Assume that r < 1.

  • (1)

    If  2N/(N + 2) ≤ p < 2  with  q > k1 − 1 = (2rp + N(p − 1 − r))/(2p + N(p − 1 − r)), then the non-negative nontrivial weak solution of Problem (1)-(2) vanishes in finite time provided that  u0  (or  |Ω|  or  λ) is sufficiently small and

    ()

  • where  k1,  M3, and  T3  are given by (11), (35), and (33), respectively.

  • (2)

    If  1 < p < 2N/(N + 2)  with  q > k2s = ((s + 1)rp + N(p − 1 − r))/((s + 1)p + N(p − 1 − r)), then the non-negative nontrivial weak solution of Problem (1)-(2) vanishes if finite time provided that  u0  (or  |Ω|  or  λ) is sufficiently small and

    ()

  • where  s,  k2,  M4, and  T4  are given by (18), (22), (39), and (41), respectively.

Proof. (1)  If 2N/(N + 2) ≤ p < 2, multiplying (1) by u and integrating over Ω, we deduce from (12) and the Hölder inequality that

()
By choosing ε1 > 0 small enough such that 1 − kε1/C(ε1) ≥ 0, we obtain that
()
provided that and q > k1 − 1 = (2rp + N(p − 1 − r))/(2p + N(p − 1 − r)), where
()

From (32) and k1 ∈ (1,2), we can derive that

()
where
()
(2)  If 1 < p < 2N/(N + 2), multiplying (1) by us, where s is given by (18) and integrating over Ω, we deduce from the Hölder inequality and (23) that
()
Choosing ε2 > 0 small enough such that spp/(p + s − 1) pkε2/C(ε2) > 0, we have
()

Therefore, we have

()
provided that and q > k2s = ((s + 1)rp + N(p − 1 − r))/((s + 1)p + N(p − 1 − r)), where
()
It follows from (38) and k2 ∈ (s, s + 1) that
()
where
()
The proof of Theorem 3 is complete.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Department of Education of Jilin Province (2013445) and by Science and Technology Bureau of Siping, Jilin Province (2012040), and is partially supported by the NSF of China under Grant 11171060.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.