Periodic Solution for Impulsive Cellar Neural Networks with Time-Varying Delays in the Leakage Terms
Abstract
This paper is concerned with impulsive cellular neural networks with time-varying delays in leakage terms. Without assuming bounded and monotone conditions on activation functions, we establish sufficient conditions on existence and exponential stability of periodic solutions by using Lyapunov functional method and differential inequality techniques. Our results are complement to some recent ones.
1. Introduction
-
(A1) There exist constants , j = 1,2, …n, such that, for any α, β ∈ R,
() -
(A2) fi(0) = 0 and for i = 1,2, …, n, there exists a constant 0 < Mi < +∞, such that
()
The main purpose of this paper is to give the conditions for the existence and exponential stability of the periodic solutions for system (4). By applying Lyapunov functional method and differential inequality techniques, without assuming (A1) and (A2), we derive some new sufficient conditions ensuring the existence, uniqueness, and exponential stability of the periodic solution for system (4), which are new and complement previously known results. Moreover, an example is also provided to illustrate the effectiveness of our results.
Throughout this paper, we assume that the following conditions hold.
(H2) The sequence of times tk (k ∈ N) satisfies tk < tk+1 and limk→+∞tk = +∞, and dik satisfies −2 ≤ dik ≤ 0 for i ∈ {1,2, …, n} and k ∈ Z+, where Z+ denotes the set of all positive integers.
For convenience, let x = (x1, x2, …, xn) T ∈ Rn, in which “T” denotes the transposition. We define |x| = (|x1|, |x2|, …, |xn|) T and ∥x∥ = max1≤i≤n{|xi|}. As usual in the theory of impulsive differential equations, at the points of discontinuity tk of the solution t ↦ (x1(t), x2(t), …, xn(t)) T, we assume that (x1(t), x2(t), …, xn(t)) T ≡ (x1(t − 0), x2(t − 0), …, xn(t − 0)) T. It is clearly that, in general, the derivative does not exist. On the other hand, according to system (4), there exists the limit . In view of the above convention, we assume that .
2. Preliminary Results
The following lemmas will be used to prove our main results in Section 3.
Lemma 1. Let (H1)–(H5) hold. Suppose that x(t) = (x1(t), x2(t), …, xn(t)) T is a solution of system (1) with the initial conditions
Proof. Assume that (11) does not hold. From (H2), we have
Calculating the upper left derivative of |xi(t)|, together with (13), (14), (H5), and
Remark 2. After the conditions (H1)–(H5), the solution of system (4) always exists (see [1, 2]). In view of the boundedness of this solution, from the theory of impulsive differential equations in [1], it follows that the solution of system (4) with initial conditions (10) can be defined on [0, +∞).
Lemma 3. Suppose that (H1)–(H5) are true. Let be the solution of system (4) with initial value , and let x(t) = (x1(t), x2(t), …, xn(t)) T be the solution of system (4) with initial value φ = (φ1(t), φ2(t), …, φn(t)) T. Then, there exists a positive constant λ such that
Proof. Let y(t) = x(t) − x*(t). Then, for i ∈ {1,2, …, n}, it is followed by
Define continuous functions Γi(ω) by setting
Let
We define a positive constant M as follows:
Now, we distinguish two cases to finish the proof.
Case (i). If (28) holds. Then, from (21), (23), and (H1)–(H5), we have
Case (ii). If (29) holds. Then, from (21), (23), and (H1)–(H5), we get
3. Main Results
In this section, we will study existence and exponential stability for periodic solutions of system (4).
Theorem 5. Suppose that all conditions in Lemma 3 are satisfied. Then system (4) has exactly one T-periodic solution x*(t). Moreover, x*(t) is globally exponentially stable.
Proof. Let x(t) = (x1(t), x2(t), …, xn(t)) T be a solution of system (4) with initial conditions (10). By Remark 2, the solution x(t) can be defined for all t ∈ [0, +∞). By hypothesis (H1), we have, for any natural number h,
Combining (39) with (40), we know that x(t + mT) will converge uniformly to a piecewise continuous function on any compact set of R.
Now we are in the position of proving that x*(t) is a T-periodic solution of system (4). It is easily known that x*(t) is T-periodic since
Finally, by Lemma 3, we can prove that x*(t) is globally exponentially stable. This completes the proof.
4. An Example
In this section, we give an example to demonstrate the results obtained in the previous sections.
Example 6. Consider the following impulsive cellar neural network consisting of two neurons with time-varying delays in the leakage terms, which is described by
Noting that
Remark 7. Since g1(x) = g2(x) = x + 2sinx, f1(x) = f2(x) = x + 3sinx and CNNs (43) is a very simple form of CNNs with time-varying delays in the leakage terms, it is clear that the conditions (A1) and (A2) are not satisfied. Therefore, all the results in [11–19] and the references therein cannot be applicable to system (43) to obtain the existence and exponential stability of the 2-periodic solutions.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the reviewers for their helpful comments in improving the presentation and quality of the paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11201184), the Natural Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial of China (Grant no. 11JJ6006), the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province (Mechanical Design and Theory), the Natural Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department of China (Grants nos. 11C0916 and 11C0915), the Natural Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial of China (Grant no. LY12A01018), and the Natural Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department of China (Grant no. Z201122436).