Volume 2013, Issue 1 273872
Research Article
Open Access

A Common Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Spaces with Nonlinear Contractive Type Condition Defined Using Φ-Function

Siniša N. Ješić

Corresponding Author

Siniša N. Ješić

Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, P.O. Box 35–54, 11120 Beograd, Serbia

Search for more papers by this author
Nataša A. Babačev

Nataša A. Babačev

Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, P.O. Box 35–54, 11120 Beograd, Serbia

Search for more papers by this author
Rale M. Nikolić

Rale M. Nikolić

Faculty of Information Technology, Metropolitan University, Tadeuša Košćuška 63, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia metropolitan.edu.rs

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 March 2013
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Fasma Diele

Abstract

This paper is to present a common fixed point theorem for two R-weakly commuting self-mappings satisfying nonlinear contractive type condition defined using a Φ-function, defined on fuzzy metric spaces. Some comments on previously published results and some examples are given.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The theory of fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh in [1]. Definitions of fuzzy metric spaces were given by Kaleva and Seikkala in [2] and by Kramosil and Michálek in [3], and these definitions are accepted by many mathematicians and physicists. The modification of these definitions were given by George and Veeramani in [4].

Definition 1 (see [5].)A binary operation * : [0,1]×[0,1]→[0,1] is a continuous t-norm if ([0,1], *) is a topological monoid with unit 1 such that a*bc*d whenever ac and bd are satisfied, for all a, b, c, d ∈ [0,1].

Example 2. a*b = ab,  a*b = min{a, b}.

Definition 3 (see [1].)A fuzzy set A in X is a function with domain in X and values in [0,1].

Definition 4 (see [3].)The 3-tuple (X, M, *) is said to be a fuzzy metric space in the sense of Kramosil and Michálek, where X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous t-norm, and M is a fuzzy set defined on set X2 × [0, ) satisfying the following conditions:

  • (FM-1)

    M(x, y, 0) = 0,

  • (FM-2)

    M(x, y, t) = 1, for every t > 0 if and only if x = y,

  • (FM-3)

    M(x, y, t) = M(y, x, t), for all x, yX and t > 0,

  • (FM-4)

    M(x, y, t)*M(y, z, s) ≤ M(x, z, t + s), for all x, y, zX and t, s > 0,

  • (FM-5)

    M(x, y, ·):(0, )  →  [0,1] is a left continuous function, for all x, yX.

A function M is called a fuzzy metric.

Remark 5 (see [4].)Let (X, d) be a metric space and a*b = ab and

()
for k, m, n+. Then, (X, M, *) is a fuzzy metric space. The 3-tuple (X, M, *) is a fuzzy metric space, also, if we observe a t-norm a*b = min {a, b} instead of a*b = ab. Taking that k = m = n = 1 in (1), we get
()

A fuzzy metric given by (2) is called the standard fuzzy metric, and it is induced by a metric d.

Grabiec in [6] proved the next lemma.

Lemma 6 (see [6].)Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. Then, M(x, y, ·) is a nondecreasing function, for all x, yX.

Definition 7 (see [4].)A sequence {xn} in a fuzzy metric space (X, M, *) is said to converge to xX if and only if for every ε > 0 and t > 0, there exists n0N such that M(xn, x, t) > 1 − ε, for every n > n0, that  is, lim nM(xn, x, t) = 1, for every t > 0. In that case, write one lim nxn = x.

Definition 8 (see [4].)A sequence {xn} in a fuzzy metric space (X, M, *) is said to be a Cauchy sequence if for every ε > 0 and t > 0, there exists n0 such that M(xn, xm, t) > 1 − ε, for all n, m > n0. A fuzzy metric space is said to be complete if every Cauchy sequence is convergent.

The following lemma is essentially given in [6].

Lemma 9. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space and lim nxn = x and lim nyn = y. Then, for every fixed t > 0, it holds

()

George and Veeramani in [4] introduced Hausdorff topology in fuzzy metric spaces. This topology is first countable.

Definition 10 (see [4].)Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. Open ball B(x, r, t) with center in xX, and radius r ∈ (0,1), for t > 0 is defined as follows:

()

Topology in fuzzy metric spaces is defined as follows:

()

Theorem 11 (see [4].)Every open ball is an open set.

Theorem 12 (see [4].)Every fuzzy metric space is Hausdorff.

Definition 13. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space and AX. The closure of the set A is the smallest closed set containing A, denoted by .

Obviously, having in mind the Hausdorff topology and the definition of converging sequences, we have that the next remark holds.

Remark 14. if and only if there exists a sequence {xn} in A such that xnx.

The facts that will play the important role in the proof of the main result are the following definition and theorem which are given and proved in [7].

Definition 15 (see [7].)Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. A collection {Fn} n is said to have fuzzy diameter zero if for each r ∈ (0,1) and each t > 0, there exists n0 such that M(x, y, t) > 1 − r, for all .

Theorem 16 (see [7].)A fuzzy metric space (X, M, *) is complete if and only if every nested sequence {Fn} n of nonempty closed sets with fuzzy diameter zero has nonempty intersection.

Remark 17 (see [7].)The element x ∈ ⋂nFn is unique.

The concept of bounded sets in probabilistic metric spaces is very close to the concept of strong boundness in fuzzy metric spaces.

Definition 18. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. Let the mappings δA(t):(0, )→[0,1] be defined as

()

The constant δA  =  sup t>0δA(t) will be called fuzzy diameter of set A. If δA = 1 the set A will be called F-strongly bounded.

Lemma 19. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. A set AX is an F-strongly bounded if and only if for each r ∈ (0,1), there exists t > 0 such that M(x, y, t) > 1 − r, for all x, yA.

Proof. The proof follows from the definitions of sup A and inf  A of nonempty sets.

Example 20. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space induced by a metric d on X given in Remark 5. AX is metrically bounded if and only if it is an F-strongly bounded.

Proof. Let AX be metrically bounded, that is, d(x, y) < k, for some k and all x, yA. Let r ∈ (0,1) be arbitrary. We will prove that there exists t > 0 such that M(x, y, t) > 1 − r, for all x, yA. Let us take t such that t > k(1 − r)/r. For this t, it follows that tr > k(1 − r) from which it follows that 0 > k(1 − r) − tr. Finally, from the last inequality, we get that t > k(1 − r) + ttr, that  is, t/(t + k) > 1 − r. Since d(x, y) < k, for all x, yA, it follows that M(x, y, t) = t/(t + d(x, y)) > t/(t + k) > 1 − r, for all x, yA. Applying Lemma 19, we get that A is an F-strongly bounded.

Conversely, if A is an F-strongly bounded set, then for arbitrary r ∈ (0,1), there exists t > 0 such that M(x, y, t) = t/(t + d(x, y)) > 1 − r, for all x, yA. From this inequality, it follows that d(x, y) < rt/(1 − r), for all x, yA, that is, the set A is metrically bounded. This completes the proof.

Properties of fuzzy metric spaces and fixed point results in these spaces are obtained by several authors [4, 711]. Results presented in [10, 11] consider the fixed point results for mappings satisfying nonlinear contractive type condition, but the class of fuzzy metric spaces is restrictive because the authors added an additional axiom for fuzzy metric spaces. Our result is applicable for arbitrary fuzzy metric space without restrictions. Recently, Miheţ in [12] proved a fixed point theorem for mappings defined on probabilistic metric spaces satisfying nonlinear contractive type condition defined using a Φ-function. We will prove a common fixed point theorem for mappings defined on fuzzy metric spaces satisfying nonlinear contractive type condition defined using Φ-function.

Khan et al. in [13] introduced the concept of altering distance functions that alter the distance between two points in metric spaces.

Definition 21 (see [13].)A function h : [0, )→[0, ) is an altering distance function if

  • (i)

    h is monotone increasing and continuous,

  • (ii)

    h(t) = 0 if and only if t = 0.

Choudhury and Das [14] extended the concept of altering distance functions to Menger PM-spaces.

Definition 22 (see [14].)A function ϕ : [0, )  →  [0, ) is said to be a Φ-function if the following conditions hold

  • (i)

    ϕ(t) = 0 if and only if t = 0,

  • (ii)

    ϕ is strictly increasing and ϕ(t) → as t,

  • (iii)

    ϕ is left continuous in (0, ),

  • (iv)

    ϕ is continuous at 0.

The class of all Φ-functions will be denoted by Φ.

Choudhury and Das [14] proved the following result.

Theorem 23 (see [14].)Let (X, , TM) be a complete Menger PM-space, with continuous t-norm TM given by TM(a, b) = min {a, b}, and let f be a continuous self-mapping on X such that for every x, yX, and all t > 0 holds

()
where ϕ is a ϕ-function and 0 < c < 1. Then, f has a unique fixed point.

The previous result is generalized and improved by Miheţ in [12].

Theorem 24 (see [12].)Let (X, , T) be a complete Menger PM-space with continuous t-norm T, and let f be a self-mapping on X such that for every x, yX, and all t > 0 holds

()
where ϕ is a Φ-function and 0 < c < 1. If there exists xX such that the orbit of f in x, 𝒪(f, x) = {fmx, m∖{0}} is probabilistic bounded, then f has a unique fixed point.

By proving common fixed point results, several authors observed different generalizations of commutativity. The concept of R-weakly commuting mappings was introduced by Pant in [15]. Following Pant, the definition of R-weakly commutativity for mappings defined on spaces with nondeterministic distances was given in [8, 9, 16].

Definition 25. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space, and let f and g be self-mappings of X. The mappings f and g will be called R-weakly commutings, if there exists some positive real number R such that

()
for all t > 0 and each xX.

2. Main Results

Lemma 26. Let (X, M, *) be a fuzzy metric space. Let ϕ be a Φ-function and 0 < c < 1. If for x, yX, it holds that

()
for all t > 0, then x = y.

Proof. Let us suppose that M(x, y, ϕ(t)) ≥ M(x, y, ϕ(t/c)) and xy. From this condition, we have M(x, y, ϕ(t)) ≤ M(x, y, ϕ(ct)) and, by induction, we have M(x, y, ϕ(t)) ≤ M(x, y, ϕ(cnt)). Taking limit as n →  , we get that M(x, y, ϕ(t)) = 0, for all t > 0, which is a contradiction, that is, x = y.

Theorem 27. Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space. Let f and g be R-weakly commuting self-mappings on X, and let f be continuous such that g(X)⊆f(X). Let, for all x, yX and every t > 0,

()
hold, where ϕ is a Φ-function and 0 < c < 1. If there exists a point u0X and n0 such that the set
()
where f(ui) = g(ui−1) (i) is an F-strongly bounded set, then the mappings g and f have a unique common fixed point in X.

Proof. First, we will prove that the mapping g is continuous. We will prove that for sequence yny, it follows that g(yn) → g(y) as n. Let t > 0 be arbitrary. For arbitrary t > 0, there exists s > 0 such that t > ϕ(s). Since f is continuous, it follows that f(yn) → f(y), that is, for all t > 0, it holds that M(f(yn), f(y), (t)) → 1 as n. Since the function M(x, y, ·) is nondecreasing for all x, yX, applying (11), we have

()
as n, that  is, M(g(yn), g(y), t) → 1 as n, for all t > 0, that is, g(yn) → g(y) as n.

For u0X from g(X)⊆f(X), it follows that there exists a point u1X such that g(u0) = f(u1). By induction, a sequence {un} can be chosen such that g(un−1) = f(un), and the set is an F-strongly bounded.

Let us consider nested sequence of nonempty closed sets defined by

()

We will prove that the family has fuzzy diameter zero.

Let r ∈ (0,1) and t > 0 be arbitrary. We will prove that there exists n* such that M(x, y, t) > 1 − r, for all . For arbitrary kn0,   k, from , it follows that Fk is an F-strongly bounded set, that is, there exists t0 > 0 such that

()

Since ϕ is a Φ-function, it follows that there exists l such that ϕ(t/cl) > t0. Let n* = l + k and be arbitrary. There exist sequences {g(un(i)−1)},  {g(un(j)−1)} in such that lim n(i)→g(un(i)−1) = x and lim n(j)→g(un(j)−1) = y.

Since for arbitrary t > 0, there exists s > 0 such that t > ϕ(s), from (11), we have

()

Thus, by induction, we get

()

Since ϕ(t/cl) > t0 and because M(x, y, ·) is a nondecreasing function, from previous inequalities, it follows that

()

As {g(un(i)−l−1)} and {g(un(j)−l−1)} are sequences in Fk from (15) and (18), it follows that, for all i, j, it holds

()

Taking liminf  as n(i),  n(j) → and applying Lemma 9, we get that M(x, y, t) > 1 − r, for all , that is, the family has fuzzy diameter zero.

Applying Theorem 16, we conclude that this family has nonempty intersection, which consists of exactly one point z. Since the family has fuzzy diameter zero and zFn, for all nn0, then for each r ∈ (0,1) and each t > 0 there exists k0n0 such that for all nk0 holds

()

From the last, it follows that for each r ∈ (0,1) and each t > 0 holds

()

Taking that r → 0, we get that for each t > 0, it holds that

()
that is, lim ng(un−1) = z. From the definition of {f(un)}, we have lim nf(un) = z.

Since f and g are R-weakly commutings, we have that for each t > 0 it holds that

()

Taking liminf  as n from previous inequality, for each t > 0, it holds that

()
that is, it holds that
()

Let us prove that f(z) = z. From (11), it follows that for every t > 0, it holds that

()

Taking liminf  as n, we have that M(g(z), z, ϕ(t)) ≥ M(f(z), z, ϕ(t/c)) holds, for every t > 0. Since f(z) = g(z), it follows that

()

Applying Lemma 26, we get that f(z) = z, that  is, z is a fixed point of f. From (25), it follows that g(z) = z, that  is, z is a common fixed point of f and g.

Let us prove that z is a unique common fixed point. For this purpose, let us suppose that there exists another common fixed point, denoted by u. From the starting condition, follow

()
for every t > 0. Therefore, we get that
()
for every t > 0. Finally, applying Lemma 26, it follows that z = u. This completes the proof.

If we take that f is identical mapping, in the statement of Theorem 27, since identical mappings commute with f and commuting mappings are R-weakly commutings, we get the following theorem.

Theorem 28. Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space. Let g be a self-mapping on X such that for all x, yX and every t > 0, it holds

()
where ϕ is a Φ-function and 0 < c < 1. If there exists a point u0X and n0 such that the set
()
where ui = g(ui−1) (i) is an F-strongly bounded set, then the mapping g has a unique common fixed point in X.

Since every Menger probabilistic metric space is fuzzy metric space, Theorem 28 is an improvement of main result presented in [12].

Example 29. Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space induced by the metric d(x, y) = |xy| on X = [0, +) ⊂ given in Remark 5. Let f(x) = 4x,  g(x) = 4x/(4 + x),  g(X) = [0,4) ⊂ X = f(X),  ϕ(t) = tm and c = 1/4.

We will prove that all the conditions of Theorem 27 are satisfied. Because

()
we conclude that f(x) and g(x) are not commuting mappings. On the other hand, we have that
()

Since 12x2/(4 + x)(1 + x) ≤ (4x2 + 12x)/(1 + x), for every x ≥ 0, we have

()
that is, for R = 1, the condition (9) is satisfied, that is, we conclude that f(x) and g(x) are R-weakly commutings, for R = 1.

We will prove that the condition (11) is satisfied too. Since 16 | xy|/(4 + x)(4 + y)≤|xy|, for all x, y ≥ 0, then we have

()

Since all the conditions of Theorem 27 are satisfied, we have that f(x) and g(x) have a unique common fixed point. It is easy to see that this point is x = 0.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Serbia, Project Grant no. 174032. The authors are very grateful to the referees for their helpful suggestions.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.