On the Existence and Stability of Periodic Solutions for a Nonlinear Neutral Functional Differential Equation
Abstract
This paper deals with the existence and stability of periodic solutions for the following nonlinear neutral functional differential equation (d/dt)Dut = p(t) − au(t) − aqu(t − r) − h(u(t), u(t − r)). By using Schauder-fixed-point theorem and Krasnoselskii-fixed-point theorem, some sufficient conditions are obtained for the existence of asymptotic periodic solutions. Main results in this paper extend the related results due to Ding (2010) and Lopes (1976).
1. Introduction
In recent years, the existence and stability of periodic solutions for differential equation has been extensively studied. Many researchers used the Lyapunov functional method, Hopf bifurcation techniques, and Mawhin continuation theorems to obtain the existence and stability of periodic solutions for neutral functional differential equation (NFDE); see papers [1–14] and their references therein. However, researches on the existence and stability of periodic solutions for NFDE by using fixed-point theorem are relatively rare [15, 16]. The reason lies in the fact that it is difficult to construct an appropriate completely continuous operator and an appropriate bounded closed convex set.
2. Main Results and Proofs
In this section, let C1(ℝN) (C(ℝN)) denote the set of all continuously differentiable functions (all continuous functions) ϕ : ℝN → ℝ, where N = 1,2. Cω = {ϕ∣ϕ ∈ C(ℝ), ϕ(t + ω) = ϕ(t)} is a Banach space with the supremum norm ∥·∥0, with the norm in a period interval, and ω is a positive constant. The next lemma will be used in the sequel.
Lemma 1. If a ≠ 0, f ∈ Cω, then the scalar equation x′(t) = ax(t) + f(t) has a unique ω-periodic solution:
Proof. It is easy to prove. We can find it in many ODE textbooks (e.g., see Example 2 on page 35 of [19]).
Theorem 2. Suppose that h ∈ C(ℝ2) and p ∈ CT. If there exists a constant H > 0 such that
Proof. According to the condition (5), we can find a sufficiently small L > 0 such that
According to Lemma 1, (9) has a unique ω-periodic solution:
Define an operator A by
In order to prove that (7) has a periodic solution, we shall make sure that A satisfies the conditions of Schauder′s fixed-point theorem (see Lemma 2.2.4 on page 40 of [20]).
Note that for any x ∈ M, we have x(t + ω) = x(t) and ∥x∥1 ≤ H
By (6), we have
For any x ∈ M, ∥Ax∥0 ≤ H, ∥(Ax)′∥0 ≤ H. According to Arzela-Ascoli Theorem (see Theorem 4.9.6 on page 84 of [21]), the subset AM of Cω is a precompact set; therefore, A : M ⊂ C1(ℝ) → Cω is a compact operator.
Suppose that {xn} ∈ M, xn → x, then ∥xn − x∥0 → 0 and as n → ∞. Also, we have
When ∥xn − x∥1 → 0 as n → ∞, |xn(t) − x(t)| → 0 for t ∈ [0, ω] uniformly. And since h is continuous, ∥Axn − Ax∥0 → 0, . Consequently, A is continuous.
Thus, by Schauder-fixed-point theorem (see Lemma 2.2.4 on page 40 of [20]), there is a ϕ ∈ M such that ϕ = Aϕ. Therefore, (7) has at least one ω-periodic solution. Since v(t) = u(Lt) and p(Lt) = p1(t), (1) has at least one T-periodic solution. The proof is completed.
Set S as the Banach space of bounded continuous function ϕ : [−r, ∞) → R with the supremum norm ∥·∥. Also, Given the initial function ψ, denote the norm of ψ by ∥ψ∥ = sup t∈[−r,0] | ψ(t)|, which should not cause confusion with the same symbol for the norm in S.
Theorem 3. Let H be as in Theorem 2. Assume that all conditions of Theorem 2 are satisfied. Suppose that h satisfies the Lipschitz condition and
Proof. By (18), we have
Given the initial function ψ, by [20, Theorem 12.2.3], there exists a unique solution v(ψ)(t) for (16). Let
For all ϕ ∈ Mψ, define the operators A and B by
For any x, y ∈ Mψ, x(t) → 0, y(t) → 0 as t → ∞, and ∥x∥≤Q, ∥y∥≤Q. Therefore, we have
Since |(Ax)′(t)| = 0, t ∈ [−r, 0], and
Suppose that {xn} ⊂ Mψ, x ∈ S, xn → x as n → ∞; then |xn(t) − x(t)| → 0 uniformly for t ≥ −r as n → ∞. Since
According to Krasnoselskii′s fixed-point theorem (see [22] or [15, Lemma 2.2]), there is a ϕ ∈ Mψ such that (A + B)ϕ = ϕ. Therefore, ϕ(t) is a solution for (16). Because the solution through ψ for the equation is unique, the solution v(ψ)(t) = ϕ(t) → 0 as t → ∞.
Theorem 4. If the Lipschitz constant L for h corresponding to ℝ2 satisfies
Theorem 5. Suppose that is h ∈ C1(ℝ2) and (hx(u*, u*), hy(u*, u*)) = (0,0); then the zero solution of (34) is exponentially asymptotically stable.
Proof. For all ϕ in C = C([−r, 0], ℝ), let
3. Examples
In this section, we present two examples to illustrate the applicability of our main results.
Example 6 (Lopes et al. [8, 9, 13, 15, 23]). Consider the NFDE (2) which arises from a transmission line model, where a > 0, b > 0, r > 0, |q| < 1, p ∈ C(ℝ), and f is a given nonlinear function. Now, let h(u(t), u(t − r)) = bf(u(t)) − bqf(u(t − r)). It is not difficult to see that (2) is a special case of (1). Therefore, by Theorems 2–5, we have the following.
Theorem 7. Suppose that f ∈ C(ℝ) and p ∈ CT. If there exists a constant H > 0 such that
Remark 8. Theorem 7 implies that the conditions in [15]
Theorem 9. Let H be as in Theorem 7. Assume that all conditions of Theorem 7 are satisfied. If f satisfies the Lipschitz condition, (b/aH)sup |x|≤H | f(x)| ≤ 1 and there exists Q > 0 such that
Remark 10. The sufficient conditions for the existence of periodic solutions in [15] are very complicated. For example, they need extra condition Q > H, m < Q − H and
Theorem 11. If all conditions of Theorem 7 are satisfied, and the Lipschitz constant L for f corresponding to (−∞, +∞) satisfies 1 − 3 | q | − (b/a)(1+|q|)L > 0, then the T-periodic solution u*(t) of (2) is stable.
Theorem 12. Suppose that p is constant, the equation p − a(1 + q)u = b(1 − q)f(u) has only one solution u*, f ∈ C1(ℝ), and f′(u*) = 0; then the equilibrium u* of (2) is exponentially asymptotically stable.
Example 13 (Lopes [9]). Consider the NFDE (3) which arises from a transmission line model, where C0 > 0, Z > 0, r > 0, |k | < 1, p ∈ C(ℝ) and f is a given nonlinear function. Let , and ; then (3) can be rewritten as
Theorem 14. Suppose that f ∈ C(ℝ) and p ∈ CT. If there exists a constant H > 0 such that
Theorem 15. Let H be as in Theorem 14. Assume that all conditions of Theorem 14 are satisfied. If f satisfies the Lipschitz condition, sup |x|≤(1+|k|)H|f(x)| ≤ ZH(1 + |k|), and there exists Q > 0 such that
Theorem 16. If all conditions of Theorem 14 are satisfied, and the Lipschitz constant L for f corresponding to (−∞, +∞) satisfies 1 − 3 | k | − (L/Z)(1+|k|) > 0, then T-periodic solution u*(t) of (3) is stable.
Theorem 17. Suppose that p is constant, the equation p − Z(1 + k)u = f(u − ku) has only one solution u*, f ∈ C1(ℝ), and f′(u* − ku*) = 0, then the equilibrium u* of (3) is exponentially asymptotically stable.
Acknowledgment
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China nos. 11201411 and 11031002.