Weighted Differentiation Composition Operators to Bloch-Type Spaces
Abstract
We characterized the boundedness and compactness of weighted differentiation composition operators from BMOA and the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces. Moreover, we obtain new characterizations of boundedness and compactness of weighted differentiation composition operators.
1. Introduction
Let 𝔻 be the open unit disk in the complex plane ℂ, H(𝔻) the space of all functions holomorphic on 𝔻, dA(z) = (1/π)dxdy the normalized area measure on 𝔻, and H∞ the space of all bounded holomorphic functions with the norm ∥f∥∞ = sup z∈𝔻 | f(z)|.
The boundedness and compactness of differentiation composition operator between spaces of holomorphic functions have been studied extensively. For example, Hibschweiler; Portnoy and Ohno studied differentiation composition operator CφD on Hardy and Bergman spaces in [8, 9]; Li; Stević and Ohno studied CφD on Bloch type spaces in [10–12]; Wu and Wulan gave a new compactness criterion of CφDm on the Bloch space in [13]. Recently, the weighted differentiation composition operator between different function spaces has also been investigated by several authors (see, for example, [14–21]).
Boundedness, compactness, and essential norm of weighted composition operator ψCφ between Bloch-type spaces have been studied in [22–24]. Recently, Manhas and Zhao [25] and Hyvärinen and Lindström [26] gave a new characterization of boundedness and compactness of ψCφ in terms of the norm of φn (for the compactness of composition operator, see [27, 28]).
Motivated by [13, 25, 26], we study the operator from BMOA and Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces.
Throughout this paper, constants are denoted by C; they are positive and not necessarily the same at each occurrence. The notation A≲B means that there is a positive constant C such that A ≤ CB. When A≲B and B≲A, we write A ≈ B.
2. Some Lemmas
Lemma 1. If f ∈ H(𝔻), then
The following lemma may be known, but we fail to find its reference; so we give a proof for the completeness of the paper.
Lemma 2. Let f ∈ H(𝔻). Then,
Proof. Applying Littlewood-Paley identity
By Theorem 6.2 of [5] and the proof of Theorem 1 of [30], we have the following lemma.
Lemma 3. Let n be a fixed positive integer and f ∈ ℬ with f(0) = f′(0) = ··· = f(n−1)(0) = 0. If
Lemma 4. Suppose that n is a fixed positive integer. Let k ∈ ℕ+, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, and
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.2 of [13] and is so omitted.
3. Boundedness of
In this section, we characterize the boundedness of from BMOA and the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces.
Theorem 5. Let α > 0, ψ ∈ H(𝔻), n ∈ ℕ+, and φ a holomorphic self-map of 𝔻. Then, the following statements are equivalent:
- (a)
is bounded.
- (b)
and are bounded.
- (c)
is bounded.
- (d)
and are bounded.
- (e)
is bounded.
- (f)
and are bounded.
- (g)
sup z∈𝔻((1−|z|2) α/(1−|φ(z)|2) n)|ψ′(z)| < ∞ and sup z∈𝔻((1−|z|2) α/(1−|φ(z)|2) n+1) | ψ(z)φ′(z)| < ∞.
- (h)
and .
Proof. It is obvious that (f)⇒(b), (f)⇒(d), (e)⇒(c), and (e)⇒(a). Thus, we will prove the theorem according to the following steps. (I): (a)⇒(g), (c)⇒(g). (II): (b)⇒(g), (d)⇒(g). (III): (g)⇒(e), (g)⇒(f). (IV): (f)⇔(h).
(I): (a)⇒(g), (c)⇒(g). Suppose that (a) or (c) holds. We choose the test function g1(z) = zn. By Lemma 2, we get
Thus, for any s0 ∈ (0,1),
So
Now, suppose that is bounded or is bounded. Set
(III): (g)⇒(e), (g)⇒(f). Note that
(IV): (f)⇔(h). Suppose that (f) is true. It follows from Proposition 5.1 of [4] that . So,
Conversely, assume that (h) is true. It is easy to see that
From now on, we assume that ∥φ∥∞ = 1. For any integer k ≥ n, let
4. Compactness of
The following criterion for the compactness is a useful tool and it follows from standard arguments, for example, Proposition 3.11 of [32] or Lemma 2.10 of [33].
Lemma 6. Let α > 0, n ∈ ℕ+, and X = ℬ0, ℬ, or BMOA. Suppose that ψ and φ are in H(𝔻) such that φ(𝔻) ⊂ 𝔻. Then, is compact if and only if for any sequence {fm} in X with , which converges to zero locally uniformly on 𝔻; we have .
We now give the compactness of from BMOA and the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces.
Theorem 7. Let α > 0, ψ ∈ H(𝔻), n ∈ ℕ+, and φ a holomorphic self-map of 𝔻. Then, the following statements are equivalent:
- (a)
is compact.
- (b)
is compact and is compact.
- (c)
is compact.
- (d)
is compact and is compact.
- (e)
is compact.
- (f)
is compact and is compact.
- (g)
ψ ∈ ℬα, ,
() - (h)
and .
Proof. The proof is a modification of that of Theorem 5; so we give a sketch of the proof. We will prove the theorem according to the following steps. (I): (a)⇒(g), (c)⇒(g). (II): (b)⇒(g), (d)⇒(g). (III): (g)⇒(e), (g)⇒(f). (IV): (f)⇔(h).
(I): (a)⇒(g), (c)⇒(g). Suppose that (a) or (c) holds. Then by Theorem 5, we have
Let {zj} be a sequence in 𝔻 such that |φ(zj)| → 1 as j → ∞. Now, we consider the function
(II) (b)⇒(g), (d)⇒(g). Suppose that (b) or (d) holds. A similar argument to (I) shows that ψ ∈ ℬα, . Now, suppose that the equations in (g) are not true. Then, there exists a sequence {zj} in 𝔻 and δ > 0 such that |φ(zj)| → 1 as j → ∞ and
(III) (g)⇒(e), (g)⇒(f). Let {fm} be a norm bounded sequence in ℬ that converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets of 𝔻. Let . For ɛ > 0, then there exists r0 ∈ (0,1) such that for |φ(z)| > r0, we have
Similar as above, we know
(IV): (f)⇔(h). Suppose that (f) is true. Note that and zk → 0 uniformly on compact subsets of 𝔻 as k → ∞; by Lemma 6, we have
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NNSF of China (Grant no. 11171203) and NSF of Guangdong Province (Grant nos. 10151503101000025 and S2011010004511).