Ψ-Stability of Nonlinear Volterra Integro-Differential Systems with Time Delay
Abstract
We give some sufficient conditions for Ψ-uniform stability of the trivial solutions of a nonlinear differential system and of nonlinear Volterra integro-differential systems with time delay.
1. Introduction
Akinyele [1] introduced the notion of Ψ-stability of the degree k with respect to a function Ψ ∈ C(R+-R+), increasing and differentiable on R and such that Ψ(t) ≥ 1 for t ≥ 0 and limt→∞Ψ(t) = b, b ∈ [1, ∞). Constantin [2] introduced the notions of degree of stability and degree of boundedness of solutions of an ordinary differential equation, with respect to a continuous positive and nondecreasing function Ψ : R+ → R+; some criteria for these notions are proved there too.
Morchało [3] introduced the notions of Ψ-stability, Ψ-uniform stability, and Ψ-asymptotic stability of trivial solution of the nonlinear system x′ = f(t, x). Several new and sufficient conditions for the mentioned types of stability are proved for the linear system x′ = A(t)x; in this paper Ψ is a scalar continuous function. In [4, 5], Diamandescu gives some sufficient conditions for Ψ-asymptotic stability and Ψ-(uniform) stability of the nonlinear Volterra integro-differential system ; in these papers Ψ is a matrix function. Furthermore, in [6], sufficient conditions are given for the uniform Lipschitz stability of the system x′ = f(t, x) + g(t, x).
In this paper, we investigate conditions on the functions f, g, p, q under which the trivial solutions of systems (3), (4), and (5) are Ψ-stability on ℝ+; the main tool used is the integral inequalities and the integral technique. Here Ψ is a matrix function whose introduction allows us to obtain a mixed behavior for the components of solutions.
Let Ψi : ℝ+ → (0, ∞), i = 1,2, …, n, be continuous functions and Ψ = diag [Ψ1, Ψ2, …, Ψn].
Now we give the definitions of Ψ-(uniform) stability that we will need in the sequel.
Definition 1 (see [4], [8].)The trivial solution of (3) ((4) or (5)) is said to be Ψ-stable on ℝ+ if for every ε > 0 and any t0 ∈ ℝ+, there exists δ = δ(ε, t0) > 0 such that any solution x(t) of (3) ((4) or (5)), which satisfies the inequality ∥Ψ(t0)x(t0)∥ < δ, exists and satisfies the inequality ∥Ψ(t)x(t)∥ < ε for all t ≥ t0.
2. Ψ-Stability of the Systems
To prove our theorems, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 3. Let h, k, p, q ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+) with (t, s) ↦ ∂th(t, s), ∂tk(t, s), ∂tp(t, s), ∂tq(t, s) ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+). Assume, in addition, that b ∈ C(ℝ+, ℝ+) and α ∈ C1(ℝ+, ℝ+) are nondecreasing functions and α(t) ≤ t for t ≥ 0. If u ∈ C(ℝ+, ℝ+) satisfies
Proof. Let T ≥ 0 be fixed and denote
Lemma 4. Let h, k, p, q, b, α be as in Lemma 3. If u ∈ C(ℝ+, ℝ+) satisfies
The proof is similar to the proof of Lemma 3, we omit the details.
Theorem 5. If there exist functions a(t, s), b(t, s) ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+) with (t, s) ↦ ∂ta(t, s), ∂tb(t, s) ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+) such that
Proof. Suppose that x(t, t0, x0) : = x(t) is the unique solution of system (3) which satisfies x(t0) = x0, since
Theorem 6. Let all the conditions in Theorem 5 hold. Suppose further that there exist functions m(t, s), n(t, s) ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+) with (t, s) ↦ ∂tm(t, s), ∂tn(t, s) ∈ C(ℝ+ × ℝ+, ℝ+) such that
Proof. For that system (4), suppose x(t, t0, x0): = x(t) is the unique solution of system (4) which satisfies x(t0) = x0, since
Using Lemma 4, the proof of system (5) is similar to that of system (4) and the details are left to the readers.
Remark 7. For Ψi = 1, i = 1,2, …, n, we obtain the theorems of classical stability and uniform stability.
3. Examples
Example 8. Consider the nonlinear differential system
Example 9. Consider the nonlinear Volterra integro-differential system as follows:
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to shape the paper’s original form. This research was supported by the NNSF of China (10971139), NSF of Shandong Province (ZR2012AL03) and the Shandong Education Fund for College Scientific Research (J11LA51).