Energies and wave functions of the states for the beryllium atom are calculated with the full-core plus correlation wave functions. Fine structures and hyperfine structures are calculated with the first-order perturbation theory. For the state, the calculated energies, fine structure, and hyperfine structure parameters are in good agreement with the latest theoretical and experimental data in the literature; it is shown that atomic parameters of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom can be calculated accurately using this theoretical method. For the (n = 3, 4) states, the present calculations may provide valuable reference data for future theoretical calculations and experimental measurements.

1. Introduction

In recent years, studies of energies, fine structures, and hyperfine structures of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom [1–10] have been of great interest to spectroscopists because there are many strong optical transitions suitable for spectral and hyperfine structure measurements. On the other hand, studies of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom play an important role in developing the excited state theory of multielectron atoms and better understanding the complicated correlation effects between electrons. The fine structure comes from the spin-orbit, spin-other-orbit, and spin-spin interactions. The hyperfine structure of atomic energy levels is caused by the interaction between the electrons and the electromagnetic multipole moments of the nucleus. The leading terms of this interaction are the magnetic dipole and electric-quadrupole moments. The fine and hyperfine structure is sensitive to the correlation effects among electrons. Experimentally, some properties of the atomic nucleus can be obtained by investigating the hyperfine structure of the atomic energy levels. The nuclear electric-quadrupole moment, which is difficult to measure directly with nuclear physics techniques, can be determined using the measured hyperfine structure and the accurate theoretical results.

The state of the beryllium atom is of interest since it is the lowest excited state in which hyperfine effects can occur, and the ground state has no hyperfine splitting because it is J = 0. It is generally a very demanding task to calculate hyperfine structure accurately. Polarization of the closed shells in the 1s² core, due to the Coulomb interaction with open shells, can have a large effect on the hyperfine structure. Up till now, the most sophisticated theoretical calculations of the hyperfine structure parameters for the state of the Be atom have been carried out using linked-cluster many-body perturbation (LC MBPT) theory [5, 6], Hartree-Fock and CI allowing all SD excitations to correlation orbitals of Slater type by Beck and Nicolaides [7], as well as multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock (MCHF) method [8, 9]. Experimentally, the magnetic dipole and electric-quadrupole hyperfine constants have been determined very accurately with the atomic-beam magnetic-resonance technique [10] for the state in beryllium. To the best of our knowledge, few results on energies, fine structures, and hyperfine structures have been investigated for the states of the beryllium atom due to the restriction of resolution from experiments and the numerical unsteadiness in theoretical calculations.

An elegant and complete variation approach, namely, the full core plus correlation (FCPC) method, has been developed by Chung [11, 12]. This method has been successfully applied to three- and four-electron systems, with the 1s² core. Many elaborate calculations, especially for the dipole polarizabilities [13], quadrupole and octupole polarizabilities [14], and total atomic scattering factors [15], show that FCPC wave functions have a reasonable behavior over the whole configuration space for three-electron systems. This method has also been used to calculate the hyperfine structure of the 1s²ns ²S and states (n = 2–5) for the lithium isoelectronic sequence; the results are in good agreement with the Hylleraas calculations and with the experiment data [16]. As is well known, theoretical calculations of the hyperfine structure parameters depend sensitively on the behavior of the wave function in the proximity of the nucleus. In addition, core polarization effects for the low l states need to be included in the nonrelativistic wave function. It would be interesting to find out whether the FCPC wave function can also be successful for calculating hyperfine structure parameters of low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom. In this work, the FCPC wave functions are carried out on the (n = 2–4) states of the beryllium atom. The energies, fine structures, and hyperfine structures are calculated and compared with the data available in the literature. The purpose of this work is to explore the capacity of the FCPC wave function to calculate the atomic parameters of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom and provide more reliable theoretical data to stimulate further experimental measurements.

2. Theory

According to the FCPC method [11, 12], the wave function for the four-electron 1s²2snp ³P state can be written as

()

where A is an antisymmetrization operator. Φ_1s1s is a predetermined 1s²-core wave function which is represented by a CI basis set,

()

the angular part is

()

χ (1,2) is a two-electron singlet spin function. The linear and nonlinear parameters in (2) are determined by optimizing the energy of the two-electron core. The factor Φ_2snp(3, 4) represents the wave function of the two outer electrons which is given by

()

the angular part is

()

The latter wave function of (1) describes the core relaxation and the intrashell electron correlation in the four-electron system. It is given by

()

where

()

A different set of α_j is used for each l(i). The angular part is

()

To simplify notation, this angular function is simply denoted as

()

with the understanding that l₁₂₃ and l₄ couple into L, the total orbital angular momentum. There are three possible spin functions for the

state, namely,

()

For the radial basis functions of each angular-spin component, a set of linear and nonlinear parameters is chosen. These parameters are determined in the energy optimization process. For each set of l₁, l₂, l₃, and l₄, we try all possible l(i) and χ and keep the ones which make significant contribution to the energy in (1).

The fine structure perturbation operators [1, 2] are given by

()

where the spin-orbit, spin-other-orbit, and spin-spin operators are

()

To calculate the fine structure splitting, the LSJ coupling scheme is used:

()

The fine structure energy levels are calculated by first-order perturbation theory

()

For an N-electron system, the hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian can be represented as follows [17, 18]:

()

where T^(k) and M^(k) are spherical tensor operators of rank k in the electronic and nuclear spaces, respectively. The k = 1 term represents the magnetic-dipole interaction between the magnetic field generated by the electrons and nuclear magnetic dipole moments, and the k = 2 term the electric quadrupole interaction between the electric-field gradient from the electrons and the nonspherical charge distribution of the nucleus. The contributions from higher-order terms are much smaller and can often be neglected.

In the nonrelativistic framework, the electronic tensor operators, in atomic units, can be written as

()

where g_l = (1 − m_e/M) is the orbital electron g factor, and g_s = 2.0023193 is the electron spin g factor. M is the nuclear mass. The tensor

is connected to the spherical harmonics Y_lm(i) by

()

The hyperfine interaction couples the electronic angular momenta J and the nuclear angular momenta I to a total angular momentum F = I + J. The uncoupling and coupling hyperfine constants are defined in atomic units as [17, 18]:

()

where M_L = L and M_S = S. In these expressions, μ_I is the nuclear magnetic moment and Q is the nuclear electric quadrupole moment. I is the nuclear spin, and J is the atomic electronic angular moment.

3. Results and Discussions

In order to achieve accurate calculation results for various properties of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom, the choice of basis function with sufficiently high quality is critical and it is our major concern. The seven l components (0,0), (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5), (6,6) altogether 159 terms are used for the 1s² core. The Φ_2snp in (1) has four angular components, l is summed from 0 to 3 with the angular components (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), and (3,4), and the number of terms in Φ_2snp ranges from 36 to 15. Most of the other correlation effects are included in (6), which accounts for the intershell as well as the intrashell correlations. Many relevant angular and spin couplings are important for the energy, these basis functions are tried to include in (1, 2, 3, 4) with significant energy contribution. For each set of orbital angular momenta l₁, l₂, l₃, and l₄, there could be several ways to couple this set into the desired total orbital angular momentum. In this work, for 1s²2snp ³P states, the important angular series (l₁, l₂, l₃, l₄) are (0, 0, l, (l + 1)), (0, 1, l, l), (l, l, 0,1), and so forth. In both cases, the value of l is from 0 to 6, as the energy contribution from set with l > 6 is small and negligible. In order to get the high-quality wave function, the number of angular-spin components in the Φ_n(i), l(i) wave functions ranges from 15 to 66, and the number of terms in the Φ_n(i), l(i) of (6) is about 790. The linear and nonlinear parameters are individually optimized in the energy minimization process. Using the Rayleigh-Ritz variational method, the basic wave function Ψ and the corresponding eigenvalue E are determined.

Nonrelativistic energies of the (n = 2–4) states for the beryllium atom are given in Table 1. As Table 1 shows, for the 1s²2snp (n = 2, 3) ³P states, the nonrelativistic energies in this work are lower and better than those of Hibbert and Weiss [1, 2], the improvement ranging from 0.0479 a.u. to 0.0473 a.u. Hibbert and Weiss reported a set of large-scale configuration interaction (CI) calculations for the 1s²2snp (n = 2, 3) ³P states, which can give an accurate approximation for each state, but it may tend to obscure the global picture of the spectrum which is so transparent in the other approach. The work of Hibbert and of Weiss did not include any intrashell correlation in the 1s shell, as the calculations were of transitions in the outer subshells. The correlation energy of the 1s shell is almost independent of the nuclear charge and also of the number of additional electrons outside the 1s shell. For Be, it is about 0.0457 a.u. and this accounts for the main difference between earlier work and the present; more accurate results are presented in Table 1. Of course, for the calculation of hyperfine parameters, correlation within the 1s shell is crucial in obtaining accurate hyperfine parameters, and this has been achieved in the present work. For the state, the present calculation from the FCPC method is also lower than the result of Weiss [2].

Table 1. Nonrelativistic energies of the 1s²2snp ³P (n = 2–4) states for the beryllium atom (in a.u.).

	This work	Hibbert^a	Weiss^b
1s²2s2p ³P	−14.56637	−14.5184	−14.51844
1s²2s3p ³P	−14.39839	−14.3510	−14.35106
1s²2s4p ³P	−14.36248		−14.31530

^aReference [1].
^bReference [2].

If including the effects of the spin-orbit, spin-other-orbit, and spin-spin interactions, the energies of the fine structure resolved J levels are obtained. In this work, the fine structure splittings of the triplet states are calculated with the H_so, H_soo, and H_ss operators using the first-order perturbation theory. Table 2 gives the fine-structure splittings of the 1s²2snp ³P_J (n = 2–4) states for the beryllium atom. The experimental Be splittings are 2.35 (J = 2 → 1) and 0.64 (J = 1 → 0) cm⁻¹ [3]. They agree with our prediction 2.36 and 0.64 cm⁻¹. Although many theoretical studies have been done on the BeI excited systems, the published theoretical fine structure results are scarce. One exception is Laughlin, Constantinides, and Victor [4]. They use a model potential calculation and predict the splittings to be 2.53 and 0.71 cm⁻¹ for the state, which should be considered as quite good in view of the simplicity in their computation and fall in experimental uncertainties. Present calculations for this state are more accurate due to correlation effect well described in this method. For the experiment, the splitting of is not resolved. But the splitting from the J = 2 state to the J = 1, 0 is determined to be 0.37 cm⁻¹. In this work, the calculated splittings are 0.35 (J = 2 → 1) and 0.092 (J = 1 → 0) cm⁻¹. This implies that the predicted splitting from J = 2 to the center of gravity of J = 1 and 0 should be 0.373 cm⁻¹. It agrees with the experiment. The good agreement with experiment could be used as the indication of the accuracy of the wave function constructed here. For the 1s²2s4p ³P_J state, our calculated splittings are hoped to offer reference for further experimental measurements.

Table 2. Fine structure splittings ν_J–J of the

states for the beryllium atom (in cm⁻¹).

	1s²2s2p ³P_J	1s²2s3p ³P_J	1s²2s4p ³P_J
ν_2–1	2.36	0.35	0.13
Experiment^a	2.35 (.2)
Other theory^b	2.53
ν_1–0	0.64	0.092	0.034
Experiment^a	0.64 (.1)
Other theory^b	0.71

^aReference [3].
^bReference [4].

The hyperfine structure parameters of the states for the beryllium atom are calculated in this work: Fermi contact a_c, the spin dipolar a_SD, the orbital a_l, and the electric quadrupole b_q. In the present calculation, Q = 0.0530b, μ_I = −1.177492 nm, I = 1.5 for Be are taken from [19]. The hyperfine interaction in the state for the beryllium atom is of interest since it is the lowest excited state in which hyperfine effects can occur, which has been studied over the past four decades [5–10]. Table 3 gives the hyperfine structure parameters of the state for the beryllium atom through the FCPC wave function to compare with data in the literature. As can be seen from Table 3, the present results for hyperfine structure parameters are better than the earlier theoretical results [5–7] in whole. The present calculations also agree with the results by FE MCHF (finite-element multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock) method [8] to two significant figures. The calculated Fermi contact term a_c in this work differs from the results from the latest calculation through MCHF method [9] by only 0.07%, and the differences for the other terms are on the order of a few parts in a thousand. This means that the wave function used in the present work is reasonable and accurate in the full configuration space. The hyperfine coupling constants A_J are also listed in Table 3 to compare with results from other calculations and experiments. Our calculated hyperfine coupling constants agree perfectly with the experimental value [10] to four significant figures. That is also true for the MCHF calculation of [9]. It is shown that hyperfine structure parameters of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom can be calculated accurately using the present FCPC wave function. For the (n = 3, 4) states, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report on hyperfine structure parameters in the literature. The present predictions for the hyperfine structure parameters and coupling constants are listed in Table 4, which may provide valuable reference data for other theoretical calculations and experimental measurements in future.

Table 3. The hyperfine structure parameters (in a.u.) and coupling constants (in MHz) of the 1s²2s2p ³P state for the beryllium atom.

Method	a_c	a_sd	a_l	b_q	A₂	A₁	Reference
LC MBPT^a	9.2319	−0.06490	0.30478	−0.1156	−124.21		[5, 6]
HF + SDCI^b	9.2738	−0.06656	0.30014	−0.1097	−124.76	−139.77	[7]
FE MCHF^c	9.2349	−0.06564	0.30261	−0.1150			[8]
MCHF	9.2416	−0.06587	0.30329	−0.11570	−124.50	−139.35	[9]
This work	9.2436	−0.06523	0.30201	−0.11588	−124.51	−139.36
Experiment					−124.5368	−139.373	[10]

^aLinked-cluster many-body perturbation theory.
^bHartree-Fock and CI allowing all SD excitations to correlation orbitals of Slater type.
^cFinite-element multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock.

Table 4. The hyperfine structure parameters (in a.u.) and coupling constants (in MHz) of the 1s²2snp ³P (n = 3, 4) states for the beryllium atom.

	a_c	a_sd	a_l	b_q	A₂	A₁
1s²2s3p ³P	12.029	−0.00898	0.04276	−0.01788	−151.59	−153.61
1s²2s4p ³P	12.118	−0.00338	0.01610	−0.00686	−151.92	−152.68

4. Summary

In this work, energies, fine-structure splittings, and hyperfine structure parameters of the (n = 2–4) states for the beryllium atom are calculated with the FCPC wave functions. The obtained nonrelativistic energies are much lower than the previous published theoretical values. The calculated fine structure splittings are in good agreement with experiment. For the state, the calculated hyperfine structure parameters are in good agreement with the latest theoretical and experimental data in the literature; it is shown that hyperfine constants of the low-lying excited states for the beryllium atom can be calculated accurately using this kind of wave function. For other states, the present predicted hyperfine structure parameters may provide valuable reference data for future theoretical calculations and experimental measurements.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Dr. Kwong T. Chung for his computer code. The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Basic Research Foundation of Beijing Institute of Technology.

References

1 Hibbert A., Oscillator strengths of transitions involving 2s3l³L states in the beryllium sequence, Journal of Physics B. (1976) 9, no. 16, 2805–2811, 2-s2.0-11344260071, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/9/16/015.
Google Scholar
2 Weiss A. W., Calculations of the 2sns¹S and 2p3p^3,1P Levels of Be I, Physical Review A. (1972) 6, no. 4, 1261–1266, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.6.1261.
Google Scholar
3 Johansson L., The spectrum of the neutral beryllium atom, Arkiv For Fysik. (1962) 23, 119–128.
Google Scholar
4 Laughlin C., Constantinides E. R., and Victor G. A., Two-valence-electron model-potential studies of the Be I isoelectronic sequence, Journal of Physics B. (1978) 11, no. 13, 2243–2250, 2-s2.0-0002468531, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/11/13/008.
Google Scholar
5 Ray S. N., Lee T., and Das T. P., Many-body theory of the magnetic hyperfine interaction in the excited state (1s²2s2p ) of the beryllium atom, Physical Review A. (1973) 7, no. 5, 1469–1479, 2-s2.0-0347201155, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.7.1469.
Google Scholar
6 Ray S. N., Lee T., and Das T. P., Study of the nuclear quadrupole interaction in the excited () state of the beryllium atom by many-body perturbation theory, Physical Review A. (1973) 8, no. 4, 1748–1752, 2-s2.0-35949031578, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1748.
Google Scholar
7 Beck D. R. and Nicolaides C. A., Fine and hyperfine structure of the two lowest bound states of Be- and their first two ionization thresholds, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. (1984) 26, no. supplement 18, 467–481, https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560260843.
Google Scholar
8 Sundholm D. and Olsen J., Large MCHF calculations on the hyperfine structure of Be(³P^O): the nuclear quadrupole moment of ⁹Be, Chemical Physics Letters. (1991) 177, no. 1, 91–97, 2-s2.0-0002991401.
Google Scholar
9 Jönsson P. and Fischer C. F., Large-scale multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock calculations of hyperfine-interaction constants for low-lying states in beryllium, boron, and carbon, Physical Review A. (1993) 48, no. 6, 4113–4123, 2-s2.0-0013290036, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.48.4113.
Google Scholar
10 Blachman A. G. and Lurio A., Hyperfine structure of the metastable (1s²2s2p)³P states of and the nuclear electric quadrupole moment, Physical Review. (1967) 153, no. 1, 164–176, 2-s2.0-0038709130, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.153.164.
Google Scholar
11 Chung K. T., Ionization potential of the lithiumlike 1s²2s states from lithium to neon, Physical Review A. (1991) 44, no. 9, 5421–5433, 2-s2.0-0000920092, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.5421.
Google Scholar
12 Chung K. T., Zhu X. W., and Wang Z. W., Ionization potential for ground states of berylliumlike systems, Physical Review A. (1993) 47, no. 3, 1740–1751, 2-s2.0-4243076574, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.1740.
Google Scholar
13 Wang Z. W. and Chung K. T., Dipole polarizabilities for the ground states of lithium-like systems from Z = 3 to 50, Journal of Physics B. (1994) 27, no. 5, 855–864, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/27/5/005.
Google Scholar
14 Chen C. and Wang Z. W., Quadrupole and octupole polarizabilities for the ground states of lithiumlike systems from Z = 3 to 20, The Journal of Chemical Physics. (2004) 121, no. 9, 4171–4174, 2-s2.0-4644332345, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1778132.
Google Scholar
15 Chen C. and Wang Z. W., Total atomic scattering factors for the ground states of the lithium isoelectronic sequence from Na⁸⁺ to Ca¹⁷⁺, The Journal of Chemical Physics. (2005) 122, no. 2, 5, 2-s2.0-22944437464, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1830482, 024305.
Google Scholar
16 Guan X. X. and Wang Z. W., The hyperfine structure of the 1s²ns²S and 1s²np states (n = 2, 3, 4, and 5) for the lithium isoelectronic sequence, The European Physical Journal D. (1998) 2, no. 1, 21–27, 2-s2.0-0001993690.
Google Scholar
17 Carlsson J., Jönsson P., and Froese Fischer C., Large multiconfigurational Hartree-Fock calculations on the hyperfine-structure constants of the ⁷Li 2s and 2p states, Physical Review A. (1992) 46, no. 5, 2420–2425, 2-s2.0-0000715921, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.2420.
Google Scholar
18 Hibbert A., Developments in atomic structure calculations, Reports on Progress in Physics. (1975) 38, no. 11, 1217–1338, 2-s2.0-0000211622, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/38/11/001.
Google Scholar
19 Raghavan P., Table of nuclear moments, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. (1989) 42, no. 2, 189–291, 2-s2.0-33750048126.
Google Scholar

All articles

Energies, Fine Structures, and Hyperfine Structures of the States for the Beryllium Atom

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Theory

3. Results and Discussions

4. Summary

Acknowledgments

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Energies, Fine Structures, and Hyperfine Structures of the States for the Beryllium Atom

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Theory

3. Results and Discussions

4. Summary

Acknowledgments

References

References

Related

Information