Volume 2012, Issue 1 328526

Research Article

Open Access

Effect of Oxygen and Hydrogen Peroxide on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Monochlorobenzene in TiO₂ Aqueous Suspension

Dyi-Hwa Tseng,

Dyi-Hwa Tseng

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan ncu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

Lain-Chuen Juang,

Corresponding Author

Lain-Chuen Juang

[email protected]

Department of Environmental Engineering and Green Environment R & D Center, Vanung University, Jhongli 32061, Taiwan vnu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

Hsin-Hsu Huang,

Hsin-Hsu Huang

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan ncu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

Dyi-Hwa Tseng,

Dyi-Hwa Tseng

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan ncu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

Lain-Chuen Juang,

Corresponding Author

Lain-Chuen Juang

[email protected]

Department of Environmental Engineering and Green Environment R & D Center, Vanung University, Jhongli 32061, Taiwan vnu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

Hsin-Hsu Huang,

Hsin-Hsu Huang

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan ncu.edu.tw

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 10 December 2012

https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/328526

Citations: 58

Academic Editor: Meenakshisundaram Swaminathan

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

The influences of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) on the degradation and mineralization of monochlorobenzene (MCB) during UV/TiO₂ process were investigated. Experimental results indicated that oxygen was a determining parameter for promoting the photocatalytic degradation. The presence of oxygen reduced the illumination time needed for the complete decay of MCB from 240 to 120 min. The photocatalytic degradation of MCB in UV/TiO₂/O₂ photocatalysis followed a simplified two-step consecutive kinetics. The rate constants of degradation (k₁) and mineralization (k₂) were increased from 0.016 to 0.046 min⁻¹ and from 0.001 to 0.006 min⁻¹, respectively, as the initial concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) was increased from 1.6 to 28.3 mg L⁻¹. Owing to the fact that H₂O₂ acted as an electron and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) scavenger, the addition of H₂O₂ should in a proper dosage range to enhance the degradation and mineralization of MCB. The optimal H₂O₂ dosage for MCB degradation was 22.5 mg L⁻¹, whereas the most efficient H₂O₂ dosage for MCB mineralization was 45.0 mg L⁻¹. In order to minimize the adverse effects of higher H₂O₂ dosage, including the capture of ·OH radicals and competitive adsorption, and to improve the photocatalytic degradation of MCB, the sequential replenishment of H₂O₂ was suggested. For the stepwise addition of a total H₂O₂ dosage of 45.0 mg L⁻¹, a complete destruction of MCB was observed within 120 min of irradiation. Additionally, the mineralization efficiency was about 87.4% after 240 min of illumination time.

1. Introduction

During last several decades, the control of organic pollutants has received much attention for its considerable amount and variety. However, the conventional biological, physical, and chemical technologies are ineffective and limitative toward the destruction of toxic and recalcitrant organic pollutants. Heterogeneous photocatalysis, one of the so-called Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs), offers an advanced oxidation capable of pollutant abatement [1, 2]. Many researchers have concluded that the UV/TiO₂ process is a promising technology for the degradation and mineralization of organic substrates to harmless final products in air and water media [3–6].

The mechanism of the UV/TiO₂ process has been discussed extensively in the literature [7–9]. When TiO₂ is irradiated with light energy equal to or higher than its band-gap, an electron (e⁻) can be excited from the valence band to the conduction band and leaving a hole (h⁺) in the valence band

()

If charge separation is maintained, the paired e⁻-h⁺ may migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst. In aqueous phase, the photoinduced h⁺ is apparently able to oxidize surface hydroxyl groups or surface-bond water molecules to produce highly reactive and nonselective hydroxyl radicals (·OH) (2). The ·OH radicals are considered to be the dominant oxidizing species contributing to the photocatalytic degradation of organic substrates [10–12]. Nevertheless, the e⁻ can recombine with the h⁺ (3), causing a decrease in the availability of the photoinduced h⁺ [13, 14]. Without electron acceptors, the limitation attributed to the recombination of e⁻-h⁺ pairs would reduce the photocatalytic efficiency and cause radiation energy loss. Therefore, suppressing the recombination of e⁻-h⁺ pairs is an important consideration in enhancing the performance of photocatalytic degradation.

In this study, both oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) were selected as electron acceptors. Monochlorobenzene (MCB), one of the hydrophobic and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), was chosen as a model compound. The objectives of the present work were to evaluate the effect of oxygen and H₂O₂ on the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. The change in the concentration of MCB with various oxygen concentrations and H₂O₂ dosages was examined. Additionally, the extent of mineralization was also estimated by measuring the concentration of total organic carbon (TOC) in MCB solution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Anatase TiO₂ powder with a specific BET surface area of 9.3 m²g⁻¹ and a primary particle size of 150 nm was purchased from Acros Organics and used as received. Reagent grade MCB (C₆H₅Cl, MW = 112.56, density = 1.106 g mL⁻¹, vapor pressure = 12 mm Hg at 25°C, and water solubility = 494 mg L⁻¹ at 25°C) with a purity over 99% was obtained from Merck. H₂O₂ (30%) was obtained from Fluka Chemical. Other chemicals used for analysis, including acetonitrile, acetic acid, potassium hydrogen phthalate, phosphoric acid, and sodium peroxydisulfate were of analytical grade. Pure N₂ and O₂ gases and air were used to adjust the initial dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration to the desired levels. Deionized water was employed for solution preparation.

2.2. Experimental Apparatus and Procedure

A hollow cylindrical photoreactor with a working capacity of 2.5 l and equipped with a water jacket was used in this study. Cooling water from a thermostatic bath (TUNGTEC BL-20) was circulated through the photoreactor jacket to keep the temperature at 30°C. Irradiation was performed using a 15 W blacklight lamp (F15T8 BLB, UVP) with a maximum emission at 365 nm. The UV lamp was vertically immersed in a quartz tube placed in the center of the photoreactor. The light intensity inside the photoreactor, as measured by potassium ferrioxalate actinometry, was 5.68 μ Einstein s⁻¹. The reaction mixture was continuously agitated by a magnetic stirrer to keep the TiO₂ particles suspended.

Two series of experiments were carried out to examine the effects of oxygen and H₂O₂ on the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. Prior to MCB solution preparation, all deionized water was first purged by N₂ gas for 30 min to minimize the amount of DO. Subsequently, the deionized water was purged with either air or O₂ gas to obtain the predetermined DO concentration. The initial concentration of MCB was fixed at 0.1 mM and the TiO₂ dosage was 1.0 g L⁻¹ unless otherwise stated. The initial pH of solution was adjusted to 7 by adding an appropriate volume of dilute NaOH or HNO₃ solutions. After 30 min of premixing in the dark, the UV lamp was switched on to initiate the photocatalytic degradation.

The experimental procedure for the H₂O₂-assisted batch was similar to the oxygen-assisted batch. In this case, the MCB solution was prepared using deionized water that had been deoxygenated by N₂ gas. After TiO₂ powder was added into the solution, the solution pH was adjusted to 7 with dilute NaOH or HNO₃ solutions. Prior to irradiation, the suspension was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min. After the addition of H₂O₂ into the suspension, the UV lamp was turned on.

At given irradiation time intervals, samples were withdrawn from the irradiated suspension. These collected samples were immediately centrifuged and filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore filter for further analysis.

2.3. Analytical Methods

The residual MCB measurement was carried out by HPLC (Biotronik HPLC BT 7900) equipped with a Linear UVIS 200 UV detector and an ODS2 C18 column (length 25 cm, inner diameter 4.6 mm). The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile (70%), water (29%), and acetic acid (1%) and the flow rate was kept at 1.5 mL min⁻¹. The detection wavelength selected for detecting MCB was 265 nm. A TOC analyzer (O. I. Analytical Model 700) equipped with a nondispersive infrared detector (NDIR) was employed to monitor the concentration of TOC. The DO concentration was quantified by an oxygen membrane electrode (Oxi 320, WTW).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Direct Photolysis and H₂O₂-Assisted Photolysis

Two preliminary experiments were carried out to estimate the contribution of direct photolysis and H₂O₂-assisted photolysis for the removal of MCB. The variation in the MCB concentration during irradiation can be seen in Figure 1. For the direct photolysis, there was about 42.8% degradation of MCB after 240 min of illumination time. This result implied that the UV light had evident contribution on the degradation of MCB which was in agreement with the observation reported by other researcher [15]. The change in the MCB concentration fitted an exponential decay curve, suggesting the direct photolysis of MCB followed the pattern of pseudo first-order kinetics. A linear regression was obtained with natural logarithmic normalized concentration against illumination time. The degradation rate constant was calculated to be 0.002 min⁻¹.

Details are in the caption following the image — **Figure 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

Direct photolysis and H₂O₂-assisted photolysis of MCB.

In order to evaluate the degradation ability of H₂O₂-assisted photolysis, an irradiation experiment was conducted under the condition of H₂O₂ dosage equal to 22.5 mg L⁻¹. Corresponding to the obtained experimental result recorded in Figure 1, it was found that the concentration of MCB decreased gradually during the period of irradiation. The extent of MCB degradation in the H₂O₂-assisted photolysis within 240 min of irradiation was approximately 60.2% and the pseudo first-order degradation rate constant was 0.004 min⁻¹. The typical time-dependent MCB concentration in the presence of both UV light and H₂O₂ was similar to that under the UV irradiation only. It was stated that H₂O₂ has an extremely low absorption at UV light of 365 nm [16], therefore, the generation of ·OH radicals due to the photolysis of H₂O₂ would be insignificant. As a result, the observable MCB decay can mainly be ascribed to the direct photolysis. Moreover, the additional MCB degradation can be explained by the oxidative ability of H₂O₂.

3.2. UV/TiO₂/O₂ Photocatalysis

3.2.1. Degradation of MCB

The dependency of the photocatalytic degradation of MCB on the initial DO concentration was studied in the range from 1.6 to 28.3 mg L⁻¹. Typical time-dependent MCB concentration during photocatalytic degradation is illustrated in Figure 2(a). As can be seen, when TiO₂ suspension was exposed to UV light, the MCB concentration decreased markedly with illumination time in comparison with the same experiment performed in the absence of TiO₂. The difference between direct photolysis and UV/TiO₂/O₂ photocatalysis revealed that UV light and TiO₂ photocatalyst together had a significant effect on the degradation of MCB. Since ·OH radicals were the key feature of UV/TiO₂ process, the degradation of MCB was primarily related to the generated ·OH radicals.

Referring to Figure 2(a), the presence of oxygen was contributed to the photocatalytic degradation. Complete destruction of MCB was observed after 240 min of irradiation when the experiment was performed under initial DO concentration equal to 1.6 mg L⁻¹. In addition, for the initial DO concentration of 28.3 mg L⁻¹, the illumination time required for complete decay of MCB was reduced to 120 min. The depletion of the DO concentration during irradiation, as recorded in Figure 2(b), confirmed that oxygen was involved in the photocatalytic degradation. Accordingly, the improvement of the degradation of MCB, which is related to the increasing initial DO concentration, can be attributed to the fact that oxygen acted as electron acceptor to trap the photoinduced e⁻ [17, 18]

()

Through the reduction of oxygen with e⁻, reactive superoxide radical anions (O₂·⁻) was produced (4). Simultaneously, the e⁻-h⁺ pair recombination was restrained. Stabilizing the primary carrier led to promote the generation of ·OH radicals. Moreover, other oxidizing species such as HO₂· and H₂O₂ were also formed (5)–(7). It was believed that additional ·OH radicals would be generated through sequential reactions [11, 19–21]. Consequently, an increase in the DO concentration would accelerate the degradation of MCB.

3.2.2. Mineralization of MCB

The decay of TOC during photocatalytic degradation was monitored to evaluate the mineralization of MCB. From the plot shown in Figure 2(c), the improvement of the mineralization of MCB in the presence of oxygen was observed. The mineralization efficiency increased from 42.6 to 93.1% within 240 min of irradiation as initial DO concentration varied from 1.6 to 28.3 mg L⁻¹. Similar observations have been reported in the literature for other model compounds [22–24].

For the initial DO concentrations of 17.9 and 28.3 mg L⁻¹, there were still measurable DO concentrations after 240 min of illumination time. Since there was sufficient oxygen in the photocatalytic system, the TOC decreased abidingly during photocatalytic degradation. Moreover, besides the electron acceptor function, oxygen can also participate in the oxidative reaction to promote the mineralization of organic substrates and intermediates [25, 26]. Consequently, the depression of TOC decay was ascribed to the lack of oxygen involved in the photocatalytic degradation afterward in the case of lower initial DO concentration.

A comparison of Figures 2(a) and 2(c) indicated that the TOC decayed with illumination time in parallel with the MCB degradation. However, it should be noted that complete disappearance of MCB occurred within 120 to 240 min of irradiation under various initial DO concentrations, whereas residual TOC was still observed. This phenomenon implied that transient organic intermediates were likely to present in the photocatalytic system.

3.2.3. Two-Step Consecutive Kinetics

Based on the total organic carbon concentration in the photocatalytic system, the mass balance can be expressed as [27, 28]

()

where [TOC]_t is the total organic carbon concentration in the system, [MCB]_c,t is the carbon concentration in the MCB at time t, and [Inter·]_c,t is the carbon concentration in the intermediates at time t. Correspondingly, the carbon concentration in the intermediates can be determined from the concentrations of MCB and TOC. Figure 2(d) illustrates the variation of carbon concentration in the intermediates for different initial DO concentration during the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. As can be seen, the intermediates accumulated first and decomposed thereafter.

Since the mineralization of MCB occurs through the intermediates, a simplified two-step consecutive kinetics can be used to describe the photocatalytic degradation [29, 30]

()

where k₁ is the degradation rate constant of MCB and k₂ is the mineralization rate constant of the intermediates. The ultimate product of the photocatalytic degradation can be CO₂, H₂O, and relevant inorganic ions. Each step in (9) is assumed to be a first-order and irreversible reaction. Applying the two-step consecutive kinetics, the carbon concentrations in the MCB and the intermediates can be expressed by

()

Accordingly, the two rate constants k₁ and k₂ can be derived from the disappearance of MCB and the intermediates.

As listed in Table 1, the increase in the value of k₁ was proportional to the initial DO concentration. The enhancement of k₁ was about 3 times higher when the initial DO concentration was 28.3 mg L⁻¹ rather than 1.6 mg L⁻¹. Take the calculated k₁ and the determined [Inter·]_c,t into (11), the value of mineralization rate constant k₂ was obtained. It was evident that the mineralization rate constant depended on the initial DO concentration. The value of k₂ increased with increasing initial DO concentration to a certain level and thereafter remained almost constant. The k₂ increased 8 times when the initial DO concentration was increased to 17.9 mg L⁻¹ rather than 1.6 mg L⁻¹. Interestingly, the values of k₂ were lower than those of k₁, this revealed that the mineralization may be the rate-limiting step in the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. Therefore, prolonged illumination time would be reasonable for complete mineralization.

Table 1. Determination of the two-step consecutive kinetic constant for the photocatalytic degradation of MCB at different DO concentration.

DO concentration, mg L⁻¹	k₁, min⁻¹	R²	k₂, min⁻¹	R²
1.6	0.016	0.9915	0.001	0.9843
3.9	0.020	0.9884	0.003	0.9787
9.0	0.025	0.9940	0.003	0.9681
17.9	0.038	0.9975	0.007	0.9591
28.3	0.046	0.9977	0.006	0.9685

3.3. UV/TiO₂/H₂O₂ Photocatalysis

3.3.1. Degradation of MCB

According to its high oxidation potential and electrophilic, H₂O₂ is a stronger electron acceptor than oxygen [31–33]. A series of experiments were conducted with deoxygenated TiO₂ suspension in order to evaluate the effect of H₂O₂ dosage on the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. The examined range of H₂O₂ dosage was varied from 5.6 to 78.0 mg L⁻¹. From the typical temporal file exhibited in Figure 3(a), it can be seen that the degradation of MCB was sensitive to the variation of H₂O₂ dosage. A pseudo first-order kinetic model was provided to simulate the degradation of MCB. Table 2 summarizes the degradation rate constant k₁ derived from the gradient of the plot of the natural logarithm of the normalized MCB concentration against the illumination time. When the H₂O₂ dosage increased from 5.6 to 22.5 mg L⁻¹ the value of k₁ increased from 0.018 to 0.026 min⁻¹. A further increase in the H₂O₂ dosage from 22.5 to 78.0 mg L⁻¹, however, led to a significant decline in the k₁ from 0.026 to 0.011 min⁻¹. The optimum H₂O₂ dosage for the degradation of MCB was around 22.5 mg L⁻¹ which was similar to that observed by other researchers [20, 34–36].

Table 2. Determination of the two-step consecutive kinetic constant for the photocatalytic degradation of MCB at different H₂O₂ dosage.

H₂O₂ dosage, mg L⁻¹	k₁, min⁻¹	R²	k₂, min⁻¹	R²
5.6	0.018	0.9966	0.002	0.9836
11.2	0.023	0.9932	0.002	0.9568
22.5	0.026	0.9956	0.002	0.8682
45.0	0.024	0.9872	0.001	0.8519
78.0	0.011	0.9972	<<0.001	0.9631

The influence of H₂O₂ dosage on the degradation of MCB can be explained in terms of the number of generated ·OH radicals and the capture of ·OH radicals [36–39]. It is well known that H₂O₂ can trap photoinduced e⁻ to stabilize the paired e⁻-h⁺

()

Additional ·OH radicals could be yielded via the reaction between H₂O₂ and e⁻ or O₂·⁻ (12) and (13). As a result, the addition of H₂O₂ into the photocatalytic system was expected to promote the degradation of MCB. Exceeding the optimum dosage, however, the excess H₂O₂ would trap the ·OH radicals to form weaker oxidant HO₂· radicals. Accordingly, the capture of ·OH radicals was occurred through (14) and (15). The decline in the ·OH radical concentration, trigged by the higher H₂O₂ dosage, restrained the degradation of MCB.

The variation of DO concentration during the UV/TiO₂/H₂O₂ photocatalysis for a variety of H₂O₂ dosage is illustrated in Figure 3(b). It was found that the DO concentration increased markedly with illumination time to reach a maximum value and decreased thereafter. The increase in the DO concentration was related to the decomposition of H₂O₂ [39, 40]

()

Correspondingly, the addition of H₂O₂ seemed to act as an oxygen source. The later decrease in the DO concentration implied that the generated oxygen was involved in the mineralization.

3.3.2. Mineralization of MCB

Similar to the degradation of MCB, the mineralization of MCB also took place throughout the entire irradiation. Figure 3(c) shows the concentration of TOC as a function of illumination time under various H₂O₂ dosages. As can be seen, the extent of TOC decay increased from 44.4 to 74.1% with H₂O₂ dosage increased from 5.6 to 45.0 mg L⁻¹ after 240 min of irradiation. At higher dosage, however, the mineralization efficiency decreased to 62.5%. Reviewing the result shown in Figure 3(a), there was still observable MCB throughout the entire irradiation period in the case of H₂O₂ dosage equal to 78.0 mg L⁻¹. This meant that the constraint on the mineralization efficiency may be ascribed to the competitive MCB.

Based on (8), the carbon concentration in the transient organic intermediates was determined as shown in Figure 3(d). Interestingly, the maximum value of intermediate concentration was decreased when the H₂O₂ dosage varied from 5.6 to 78.0 mg L⁻¹. When H₂O₂ dosage was 5.6 mg L⁻¹, the intermediates accumulated abidingly to its maximum value of 5.6 mg L⁻¹ as TOC and then decreased. Similarly, the maximum values were 4.7, 3.5, 3.2, and 3.0 mg L⁻¹ as TOC in the cases of H₂O₂ dosage equal to 11.2, 22.5, 45.0, and 78.0 mg L⁻¹, respectively. The decline in the maximum concentration of the intermediates revealed that some fraction of mineralization was occurred in parallel with the degradation of MCB.

Applying two-step consecutive kinetic model to the determined intermediate concentration, the mineralization rate constant k₂ was calculated as summarized in Table 2. It can be seen that the value of k₂ was decreased with increasing H₂O₂ dosage. The highest k₂ value was 0.002 min⁻¹ under the experimental conditions of H₂O₂ dosage equal to 5.6, 11.2, and 22.5 mg L⁻¹. Notably, when the H₂O₂ dosage was 78.0 mg L⁻¹, the determined k₂ value was lower than 0.001 min⁻¹. According to the principle of the two-step consecutive kinetics, the calculation of k₂ value was depend on the concentration of the intermediates and the value of k₁. Consequently, the decline of the maximum intermediates concentration as H₂O₂ dosage was increased led to a lower k₂ value.

3.4. Evaluation of Oxygen and H₂O₂ as Electron Acceptors

According to its characteristics as electron acceptor and oxidizing agent, the presence of oxygen in photocatalytic system was beneficial for the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. The experimental results confirmed that the photocatalytic degradation of MCB in the presence of oxygen followed a simplified two-step consecutive kinetics. For kinetic analysis, both degradation and mineralization rate constants had been demonstrated to increase with increasing DO concentration. However, this is an important consideration to bear in mind that the DO concentration in contaminated water may be limited and aeration would cause the stripping of volatile organic compound such as MCB.

It is preferential to use H₂O₂ where there is a limited availability of oxygen. Considering its hydrophilic property, the H₂O₂ would come into contact with the hydroxylated TiO₂ particles in aqueous solution and trap the photoinduced e⁻. Furthermore, H₂O₂ could also serve as an oxygen source to improve the mineralization. Excess H₂O₂, however, could act as ·OH radical scavenger in the photocatalytic system. Moreover, the H₂O₂ may compete with MCB for the active sites of TiO₂ particle [32, 41–44] to suppress the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. To avoid the capture of ·OH radical and competitive adsorption under high H₂O₂ dosage, sequential replenishment of H₂O₂ into UV/TiO₂ system was suggested.

Referring to Figure 3, the most efficient degradation was observed where the H₂O₂ dosage was 22.5 mg L⁻¹, whereas the optimal H₂O₂ dosage for MCB mineralization was 45.0 mg L⁻¹. Accordingly, total dosage of H₂O₂ equal to 45.0 mg L⁻¹ was chosen for the evaluation of the photocatalytic degradation of MCB under various H₂O₂ addition sequences. In the experiment of stepwise addition of H₂O₂, 22.5 mg L⁻¹ of H₂O₂ was added into the TiO₂ suspension, once before irradiation and again after 40 min of illumination time. As the result illustrated in Figure 4(a), 120 min of irradiation was sufficient for complete elimination of MCB in the case when a two-step addition was made. On the contrary, 180 min of illumination time was needed for the one-time addition. The enhancement of the degradation efficiency was correlated to the higher degradation rate constant when the H₂O₂ dosage was 22.5 mg L⁻¹ rather than 45.0 mg L⁻¹. Moreover, the second addition of H₂O₂ was attributed to sustain the suppression of the e⁻-h⁺ pair recombination.

Monitoring the variation of DO concentration during photocatalytic degradation, it was observed that the oxygen accumulated continuously within 120 min of illumination time then decreased thereafter for both cases (Figure 4(b)). The concentration of the intermediates showed a similar tendency as depicted in Figure 4(c). Oxygen generated as a result of the decomposition of H₂O₂ whereas the accumulation of intermediates was due to the degradation of MCB. According to the effective degradation under the two-step addition of H₂O₂, the concentration of intermediates increased faster than that under one-time addition of H₂O₂. Furthermore, since oxygen would participate in the mineralization of MCB, both the concentrations of oxygen and intermediates declined afterward. A comparison of the experimental profiles shows that depletion of the intermediates concentration was shaper for the two-step addition of H₂O₂ than that for the one-time addition. Correspondingly, after 240 min of irradiation the mineralization efficiency of MCB in the case of two-step addition of H₂O₂ was 87.4% higher than the value of 74.1% in the case of one-time addition. The increment in the mineralization efficiency can be explained as due to the restraint of the capture of ·OH radicals, the additional ·OH radicals related with second dose of H₂O₂, and the participation of oxygen in photocatalytic degradation. Accordingly, it was evident that the sequential replenishment of H₂O₂ into UV/TiO₂ system was advisable as a way to improve the efficiency of the photocatalytic degradation.

4. Conclusions

The direct photolysis and the oxidative potential of H₂O₂ were proven to have slight contribution on the degradation of MCB. Notably, UV light and TiO₂ together showed a marked effect. Increasing the DO concentration was beneficial for the photocatalytic degradation of MCB. Correspondingly, the degradation and mineralization rate constants increased with the DO concentration. Owing to the mineralization of MCB occurs through the intermediates, a simplified two-step consecutive kinetics can be used to describe the photocatalytic degradation in UV/TiO₂/O₂ photocatalysis. For the UV/TiO₂/H₂O₂ photocatalysis, H₂O₂ of lower dosage acted as electron acceptor to enhance the degradation efficiency. When the dosage was high, however, the degradation was suppressed due to the capture of ·OH radicals and the competitive adsorption of H₂O₂. In order to abate the disadvantages caused by using a higher H₂O₂ dosage, sequential replenishment of H₂O₂ into UV/TiO₂ system was performed. Experimental results demonstrated that both degradation and mineralization efficiencies were enhanced by the restraint of the capture of ·OH radicals, the additional ·OH radicals caused from the second stage addition of H₂O₂, and the participation of oxygen in photocatalytic degradation.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council, R.O.C. for financial support of this study under Contract no. NSC 90-2211-E-238-003.

References

1 Akpan U. G. and Hameed B. H., Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO₂-based photocatalysts: a review, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (2009) 170, no. 2-3, 520–529, 2-s2.0-69049112781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.039.
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.039
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2 Herrmann J. M., Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants, Catalysis Today. (1999) 53, no. 1, 115–129, 2-s2.0-0033570369.
10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00107-8
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Balasubramanian G., Dionysiou D. D., Suidan M. T., Baudin I., and Laîné J. M., Evaluating the activities of immobilized TiO₂ powder films for the photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water, Applied Catalysis B. (2004) 47, no. 2, 73–84, 2-s2.0-0842349507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.04.002.
10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.04.002
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Chong M. N., Jin B., Chow C. W. K., and Saint C., Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review, Water Research. (2010) 44, no. 10, 2997–3027, 2-s2.0-77952548564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039.
10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Stafford U., Gray K. A., and Kamat P. V., Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants: halophenols and related model compounds, Heterogeneous Chemistry Reviews. (1996) 3, no. 2, 77–104, 2-s2.0-0001842287.
10.1002/(SICI)1234-985X(199606)3:2<77::AID-HCR49>3.0.CO;2-M
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 Zhang T., Oyama T., Horikoshi S., Zhao J., Serpone N., and Hidaka H., Photocatalytic decomposition of the sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate surfactant in aqueous titania suspensions exposed to highly concentrated solar radiation and effects of additives, Applied Catalysis B. (2003) 42, no. 1, 13–24, 2-s2.0-0037446929, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00189-3.
10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00189-3
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
7 Hoffmann M. R., Martin S. T., Choi W., and Bahnemann D. W., Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis, Chemical Reviews. (1995) 95, no. 1, 69–96, 2-s2.0-0039129509.
10.1021/cr00033a004
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
8 Konstantinou I. K. and Albanis T. A., Photocatalytic transformation of pesticides in aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions using artificial and solar light: intermediates and degradation pathways, Applied Catalysis B. (2003) 42, no. 4, 319–335, 2-s2.0-0037696429, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00266-7.
10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00266-7
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Sobczyński A., Duczmal L., and Zmudziński W., Phenol destruction by photocatalysis on TiO₂: an attempt to solve the reaction mechanism, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A. (2004) 213, no. 2, 225–230, 2-s2.0-19244370600, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2003.12.006.
10.1016/j.molcata.2003.12.006
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Chhor K., Bocquet J. F., and Colbeau-Justin C., Comparative studies of phenol and salicylic acid photocatalytic degradation: influence of adsorbed oxygen, Materials Chemistry and Physics. (2004) 86, no. 1, 123–131, 2-s2.0-2442660456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.023.
10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.023
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Hirakawa T., Yawata K., and Nosaka Y., Photocatalytic reactivity for and OH· radical formation in anatase and rutile TiO₂ suspension as the effect of H₂O₂ addition, Applied Catalysis A. (2007) 325, no. 1, 105–111, 2-s2.0-34248198382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.03.015.
10.1016/j.apcata.2007.03.015
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
12 Qamar M., Saquib M., and Muneer M., Photocatalytic degradation of two selected dye derivatives, chromotrope 2B and amido black 10B, in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide, Dyes and Pigments. (2005) 65, no. 1, 1–9, 2-s2.0-7044272508, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.06.006.
10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.06.006
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Dionysiou D. D., Burbano A. A., Suidan M. T., Baudin I., and Laîné J. M., Effect of oxygen in a thin-film rotating disk photocatalytic reactor, Environmental Science and Technology. (2002) 36, no. 17, 3834–3843, 2-s2.0-0036713518, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0113605.
10.1021/es0113605
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 Wu C. H., Comparison of azo dye degradation efficiency using UV/single semiconductor and UV/coupled semiconductor systems, Chemosphere. (2004) 57, no. 7, 601–608, 2-s2.0-5444254522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.07.008.
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.07.008
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Bhatkhande D. S., Sawant S. B., Schouten J. C., and Pangarkar V. G., Photocatalytic degradation of chlorobenzene using solar and artificial UV radiation, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. (2004) 79, no. 4, 354–360, 2-s2.0-1842454269, https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.980.
10.1002/jctb.980
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Chu W. and Wong C. C., The photocatalytic degradation of dicamba in TiO₂ suspensions with the help of hydrogen peroxide by different near UV irradiations, Water Research. (2004) 38, no. 4, 1037–1043, 2-s2.0-0842346175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.037.
10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.037
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Zhang D., Qiu R., Song L., Eric B., Mo Y., and Huang X., Role of oxygen active species in the photocatalytic degradation of phenol using polymer sensitized TiO₂ under visible light irradiation, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (2009) 163, no. 2-3, 843–847, 2-s2.0-59849114446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.036.
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.036
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Villarreal T. L., Bogdanoff P., Salvador P., and Alonso-Vante N., Photocatalytic oxidation on nanostructured chalcogenide modified titanium dioxide, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. (2004) 83, no. 4, 347–362, 2-s2.0-2942615259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.01.032.
10.1016/j.solmat.2004.01.032
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Carp O., Huisman C. L., and Reller A., Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide, Progress in Solid State Chemistry. (2004) 32, no. 1-2, 33–177, 2-s2.0-9944222778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001.
10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Garcia J. C. and Takashima K., Photocatalytic degradation of imazaquin in an aqueous suspension of titanium dioxide, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. (2003) 155, no. 1–3, 215–222, 2-s2.0-0037456022.
10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00370-2
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
21 Lifongo L. L., Bowden D. J., and Brimblecombe P., Photodegradation of haloacetic acids in water, Chemosphere. (2004) 55, no. 3, 467–476, 2-s2.0-1342332352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.006.
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.006
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22 Dieckmann M. S. and Gray K. A., A comparison of the degradation of 4-nitrophenol via direct and sensitized photocatalysis in TiO₂ slurries, Water Research. (1996) 30, no. 5, 1169–1183, 2-s2.0-0030152220, https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00240-5.
10.1016/0043-1354(95)00240-5
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
23 Palmer F. L., Eggins B. R., and Coleman H. M., The effect of operational parameters on the photocatalytic degradation of humic acid, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. (2002) 148, no. 1–3, 137–143, 2-s2.0-0037204974, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00083-7.
10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00083-7
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
24 Wongkalasin P., Chavadej S., and Sreethawong T., Photocatalytic degradation of mixed azo dyes in aqueous wastewater using mesoporous-assembled TiO₂ nanocrystal synthesized by a modified sol-gel process, Colloids and Surfaces A. (2011) 384, no. 1–3, 519–528, 2-s2.0-79959752651, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.05.022.
10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.05.022
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
25 Wang Y. and Hong C. S., TiO₂-mediated photomineralization of 2-chlorobiphenyl: the role of O₂, Water Research. (2000) 34, no. 10, 2791–2797, 2-s2.0-0034237657, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00009-9.
10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00009-9
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
26 Adán C., Carbajo J., Bahamonde A., and Martínez-Arias A., Phenol photodegradation with oxygen and hydrogen peroxide over TiO₂ and Fe-doped TiO₂, Catalysis Today. (2009) 143, no. 3-4, 247–252, 2-s2.0-67349278775, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.003.
10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.003
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
27 Tatti L., Niego D., Rota F., Bruzzi P., Moroni A., Bellobono I. R., Bonardi M., Bianchi M., and Muntau H., Mathematical modelling of pilot-plant photomineralization of chlorophenols in aqueous solution, by photocatalytic membranes immobilizing titanium dioxide, Chemosphere. (1997) 34, no. 1, 41–49, 2-s2.0-0031023297, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(96)00366-9.
10.1016/S0045-6535(96)00366-9
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
28 Wang K. H., Hsieh Y. H., and Chen L. J., The heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation, intermediates and mineralization for the aqueous solution of cresols and nitrophenols, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (1998) 59, no. 2-3, 251–260, 2-s2.0-0032055283, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00151-9.
10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00151-9
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
29 Ku Y., Leu R. M., and Lee K. C., Decomposition of 2-chlorophenol in aqueous solution by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide, Water Research. (1996) 30, no. 11, 2569–2578, 2-s2.0-0030298394, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00147-9.
10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00147-9
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
30 Rota F., Cavassi M., Niego D., Gorlani R., Vianelli L., Tatti L., Bruzzi P., Moroni A., Bellobono I. R., Bianchi M., and Muntau H., Mathematical modelling of photomineralization of phenols in aqueous solution, by photocatalytic membranes immobilizing titanium dioxide, Chemosphere. (1996) 33, no. 11, 2159–2173, 2-s2.0-0030561566, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00308-6.
10.1016/0045-6535(96)00308-6
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
31 Daneshvar N., Salari D., and Khataee A. R., Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid red 14 in water: investigation of the effect of operational parameters, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. (2003) 157, no. 1, 111–116, 2-s2.0-0037459943, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00015-7.
10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00015-7
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
32 Dionysiou D. D., Suidan M. T., Baudin I., and Laîné J. M., Effect of hydrogen peroxide on the destruction of organic contaminants-synergism and inhibition in a continuous-mode photocatalytic reactor, Applied Catalysis B. (2004) 50, no. 4, 259–269, 2-s2.0-2542550451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.022.
10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.022
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
33 Ilisz I., László Z., and Dombi A., Investigation of the photodecomposition of phenol in near-UV-irradiated aqueous TiO₂ suspensions—I: effect of charge-trapping species on the degradation kinetics, Applied Catalysis A. (1999) 180, no. 1-2, 25–33, 2-s2.0-0348226544.
10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00355-X
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
34 Poulios I., Kositzi M., and Kouras A., Photocatalytic decomposition of triclopyr over aqueous semiconductor suspensions, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. (1998) 115, no. 2, 123–129.
10.1016/S1010-6030(98)00259-7
Web of Science® Google Scholar
35 Yu J. C., Kwong T. Y., Luo Q., and Cai Z., Photocatalytic oxidation of triclosan, Chemosphere. (2006) 65, no. 3, 390–399, 2-s2.0-33747088151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.011.
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.011
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36 Gupta V. K., Jain R., Agarwal S., and Shrivastava M., Kinetics of photo-catalytic degradation of hazardous dye Tropaeoline 000 using UV/TiO₂ in a UV reactor, Colloids and Surfaces A. (2011) 378, no. 1–3, 22–26, 2-s2.0-79952703363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.01.046.
10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.01.046
CAS Google Scholar
37 Bandala E. R., Gelover S., Leal M. T., Arancibia-Bulnes C., Jimenez A., and Estrada C. A., Solar photocatalytic degradation of Aldrin, Catalysis Today. (2002) 76, no. 2–4, 189–199, 2-s2.0-0037112867, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00218-3.
10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00218-3
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
38 Bizani E., Fytianos K., Poulios I., and Tsiridis V., Photocatalytic decolorization and degradation of dye solutions and wastewaters in the presence of titanium dioxide, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (2006) 136, no. 1, 85–94, 2-s2.0-33744924471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.017.
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.017
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
39 Chen J., Liu M., Zhang J., Ying X., and Jin L., Photocatalytic degradation of organic wastes by electrochemically assisted TiO₂ photocatalytic system, Journal of Environmental Management. (2004) 70, no. 1, 43–47, 2-s2.0-0842302405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.019.
10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.019
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
40 Velegraki T., Poulios I., Charalabaki M., Kalogerakis N., Samaras P., and Mantzavinos D., Photocatalytic and sonolytic oxidation of acid orange 7 in aqueous solution, Applied Catalysis B. (2006) 62, no. 1-2, 159–168, 2-s2.0-29144536287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.07.007.
10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.07.007
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
41 Cornish B. J. P. A., Lawton L. A., and Robertson P. K. J., Hydrogen peroxide enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of microcystin-lR using titanium dioxide, Applied Catalysis B. (2000) 25, no. 1, 59–67, 2-s2.0-0034696015, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(99)00121-6.
10.1016/S0926-3373(99)00121-6
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
42 Hirakawa T. and Nosaka Y., Properties of and ·OH Formed in TiO₂ aqueous suspensions by photocatalytic reaction and the influence of H₂O₂ and some ions, Langmuir. (2002) 18, no. 8, 3247–3254, 2-s2.0-0037117871, https://doi.org/10.1021/la015685a.
10.1021/la015685a
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
43 Sauer T., Cesconeto Neto G., José H. J., and Moreira R. F. P. M., Kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of reactive dyes in a TiO₂ slurry reactor, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. (2002) 149, no. 1–3, 147–154, 2-s2.0-0037189105, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00015-1.
10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00015-1
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
44 Lodha S., Jain A., and Punjabi P. B., A novel route for waste water treatment: photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B, Arabian Journal of Chemistry. (2011) 4, 383–387, 2-s2.0-77955210546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.008.
10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.008
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

All articles

Effect of Oxygen and Hydrogen Peroxide on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Monochlorobenzene in TiO₂ Aqueous Suspension

Abstract

1. Introduction