A review on smart dressings with advanced features
Neda Akhavan-Kharazian MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Hossein Izadi-Vasafi PhD
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Correspondence
Hossein Izadi-Vasafi, Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMasih Tabashiri-Isfahani MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorHossein Hatami-Boldaji MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorNeda Akhavan-Kharazian MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Hossein Izadi-Vasafi PhD
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Correspondence
Hossein Izadi-Vasafi, Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMasih Tabashiri-Isfahani MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorHossein Hatami-Boldaji MSc
Department of Polymer Engineering, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Wound care is a multifaceted and collaborative process, and chronic wounds can have significant repercussions on a patient's well-being and impose a financial burden on the healthcare industry. While traditional wound dressings can effectively facilitate healing, their limitations in addressing the intricacies of the wound healing process remain a formidable obstacle. Smart wound dressings have emerged as a promising solution to tackle this challenge, offering numerous advantages over conventional dressings, such as real-time monitoring of wound healing and enhanced wound care management. These advanced medical dressings incorporate microelectronic sensors that can monitor the wound environment and provide timely interventions for accelerated and comprehensive healing. Furthermore, advancements in drug delivery systems have enabled real-time monitoring, targeted therapy, and controlled release of medications. Smart wound dressings exhibit versatility, as they are available in various forms and can be utilised for treating different types of acute or chronic wounds. Ultimately, the development of innovative wound care technologies and treatments plays a vital role in addressing the complexities presented by wounds and enhancing patients' quality of life. This review sheds light on the diverse types of smart dressings and their distinctive features, emphasising their potential in advancing the field of wound care.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Xu R, Luo G, Xia H, et al. Novel bilayer wound dressing composed of silicone rubber with particular micropores enhanced wound re-epithelialization and contraction. Biomaterials. 2015; 40: 1-11.
- 2Admassie M, Tsige E, Chanie M. Isolation, identification and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from wounds of patients attending at arsho advanced medical laboratory. Science. 2018; 7(2): 20-24.
- 3Natarajan S, Williamson D, Stiltz AJ, Harding K. Advances in wound care and healing technology. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000; 1(5): 269-275.
- 4Nethi SK, das S, Patra CR, Mukherjee S. Recent advances in inorganic nanomaterials for wound-healing applications. Biomater sci. 2019; 7(7): 2652-2674.
- 5Sen CK. Human wound and its burden: updated 2020 compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care. 2021; 10(5): 281-292.
- 6Nussbaum SR, Carter MJ, Fife CE, et al. An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds. Value Health. 2018; 21(1): 27-32.
- 7Powers JG, Morton LM, Phillips TJ. Dressings for chronic wounds. Dermatol Ther. 2013; 26(3): 197-206.
- 8Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Adv Ther. 2017; 34: 599-610.
- 9Nelson EA, Adderley U. Venous leg ulcers. BMJ Clin Evid. 2016; 2016: 1902.
- 10Abbade LPF, Lastória S. Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Dermatol. 2005; 44(6): 449-456.
- 11Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(8): 735.
- 12Vowden P, Vowden K. The economic impact of hard-to-heal wounds: promoting practice change to address passivity in wound management. Wounds. 2016; 7(2): 10-15.
- 13Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery. 2014; 32(9): 462-467.
- 14George Broughton I, Janis JE, Attinger CE. A brief history of wound care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(7S): 6S-11S.
- 15Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings – a review. Biomedicine. 2015; 5(4): 22.
- 16Nguyen HM, Ngoc le TT, Nguyen AT, Thien le HN, Pham TT. Biomedical materials for wound dressing: recent advances and applications. RSC Adv. 2023; 13(8): 5509-5528.
- 17Yaghoobi M, Nasrollahzadeh M, Asjadi F. Modern wound dressings and their application. JSSU. 2019; 27(6): 1638-1655.
- 18Moore ZE, Webster J. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 12(12):CD009362.
- 19Brumberg V, Astrelina T, Malivanova T, Samoilov A. Modern wound dressings: hydrogel dressings. Biomedicine. 2021; 9(9):1235. doi:10.3390/biomedicines9091235
- 20Heyer K, Augustin M, Protz K, Herberger K, Spehr C, Rustenbach SJ. Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatology. 2013; 226(2): 172-184.
- 21Moura LI, Moura LIF, Dias AMA, Carvalho E, de Sousa HC. Recent advances on the development of wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcer treatment—a review. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9(7): 7093-7114. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.033
- 22Hopper G, Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO, Clarke JV. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. J Wound Care. 2012; 21(4): 200-203. doi:10.12968/jowc.2012.21.4.200
- 23Thu H-E, Zulfakar MH, Ng S-F. Alginate based bilayer hydrocolloid films as potential slow-release modern wound dressing. Int J Pharm. 2012; 434(1–2): 375-383.
- 24Okuma CH, Andrade TAM, Caetano GF, et al. Development of lamellar gel phase emulsion containing marigold oil (Calendula officinalis) as a potential modern wound dressing. Eur J Pharm sci. 2015; 71: 62-72.
- 25Almadani YH, Vorstenbosch J, Davison PG, Murphy AM. Wound healing: a comprehensive review. Semin Plast Surg. 2021; 35(3): 141-144.
- 26Zahedi P, Rezaeian I, Ranaei-Siadat SO, Jafari SH, Supaphol P. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym Adv Technol. 2010; 21(2): 77-95.
- 27Siddiqui AR, Bernstein JM. Chronic wound infection: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010; 28(5): 519-526.
- 28Demidova-Rice TN, Hamblin MR, Herman IM. Acute and impaired wound healing: pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 1: normal and chronic wounds: biology, causes, and approaches to care. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012; 25(7): 304-314.
- 29Cowan L, Stechmiller J, Phillips P, Schultz G. Science of wound healing: Translation of bench science into advances for chronic wound care. Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals. 5th ed. HMP Communications; 2012: 25-35.
- 30Frykberg R, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2015; 4(9): 560-582.
- 31Schultz GS, Chin GA, Moldawer L, Diegelmann RF. Principles of wound healing. Mechanisms of Vascular Disease: A Reference Book for Vascular Specialists. University of Adelaide Press; 2011.
10.1017/UPO9781922064004.024 Google Scholar
- 32Sezer AD, Cevher E. Biopolymers as wound healing materials: challenges and new strategies. Biomaterials Applications for Nanomedicine 2011: 383-414.
- 33Sheikh Z, Hamdan N, Ikeda Y, Grynpas M, Ganss B, Glogauer M. Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review. Biomater Res. 2017; 21(1): 1-20. doi:10.1186/s40824-017-0095-5
- 34Oro FB, Sikka RS, Wolters B, et al. Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(9): 1219-1225.
- 35Akhavan-Kharazian N, Izadi-Vasafi H. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/gelatin/nanocrystalline cellulose/calcium peroxide films for potential wound dressing applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 133: 881-891.
- 36Weller C, Team V. Interactive dressings and their role in moist wound management. Advanced Textiles for Wound Care. Elsevier; 2019: 105-134.
10.1016/B978-0-08-102192-7.00004-7 Google Scholar
- 37Francesko A, Petkova P, Tzanov T. Hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management. Curr Med Chem. 2018; 25(41): 5782-5797.
- 38Liu H, Wang C, Li C, et al. A functional chitosan-based hydrogel as a wound dressing and drug delivery system in the treatment of wound healing. RSC Adv. 2018; 8(14): 7533-7549.
- 39Su J, Li J, Liang J, Zhang K, Li J. Hydrogel preparation methods and biomaterials for wound dressing. Life. 2021; 11(10): 1016.
- 40Zhang W, Liu L, Cheng H, et al. Hydrogel-based dressings designed to facilitate wound healing. Mater Adv. 2024; 5(4): 1364-1394.
- 41Liang M, Chen Z, Wang F, Liu L, Wei R, Zhang M. Preparation of self-regulating/anti-adhesive hydrogels and their ability to promote healing in burn wounds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019; 107(5): 1471-1482.
- 42Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery (Oxford). 2017; 35(9): 489-494.
10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.06.005 Google Scholar
- 43Nielsen J, Fogh K. Clinical utility of foam dressings in wound management: a review. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2015; 2: 31.
- 44Lee SM, Park IK, Kim YS, et al. Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing. Biomater Res. 2016; 20(1): 1-11.
- 45Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym sci. 2012; 37(1): 106-126.
- 46Hickman DA, Pawlowski CL, Sekhon UDS, Marks J, Gupta AS. Biomaterials and advanced technologies for hemostatic management of bleeding. Adv Mater. 2018; 30(4):1700859.
- 47Aderibigbe BA, Buyana B. Alginate in wound dressings. Pharmaceutics. 2018; 10(2): 42.
- 48Solanki G, Solanki R. Alginate dressings, an overview. Int J Biomed Res. 2012; 3(1): 24-28.
- 49Arroyo AA, Casanova PL, Soriano JV, Torra I Bou JE. Open-label clinical trial comparing the clinical and economic effectiveness of using a polyurethane film surgical dressing with gauze surgical dressings in the care of post-operative surgical wounds. Int Wound J. 2015; 12(3): 285-292.
- 50Bates M. The future of wound care. IEEE Pulse. 2020; 11(4): 22-25.
- 51Murphy C, Atkin L, Swanson T, et al. Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibiofilm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. J Wound Care. 2020; 29(Sup3b): S1-S26.
- 52Schultz HB, Vasani RB, Holmes AM, Roberts MS, Voelcker NH. Stimulus-responsive antibiotic releasing systems for the treatment of wound infections. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019; 2(2): 704-716.
- 53Ribeiro AM, Flores-Sahagun TH. Application of stimulus-sensitive polymers in wound healing formulation. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2020; 69(15): 979-989.
- 54O'Callaghan S, Galvin P, O'Mahony C, Moore Z, Derwin R. ‘Smart’ wound dressings for advanced wound care: a review. J Wound Care. 2020; 29(7): 394-406. doi:10.12968/jowc.2020.29.7.394
- 55Mehmood N, Hariz A, Fitridge R, Voelcker NH. Applications of modern sensors and wireless technology in effective wound management. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014; 102(4): 885-895.
- 56Dargaville TR, Farrugia BL, Broadbent JA, Pace S, Upton Z, Voelcker NH. Sensors and imaging for wound healing: a review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013; 41: 30-42.
- 57Guo J, Dardik A, Fang K, Huang R, Gu Y. Meta-analysis on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with autologous stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017; 8(1): 228. doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0683-2
- 58Crowe, E., et al., Developing Wound Moisture Sensors: Opportunities and Challenges for Laser-Induced Graphene-Based Materials. Journal of Composites Science, 2022. 6(6): p. 176.
- 59Milne SD, Seoudi I, al Hamad H, et al. A wearable wound moisture sensor as an indicator for wound dressing change: an observational study of wound moisture and status. Int Wound J. 2016; 13(6): 1309-1314.
- 60Im H, Lee S, Naqi M, Lee C, Kim S. Flexible PI-based plant drought stress sensor for real-time monitoring system in smart farm. Electronics. 2018; 7(7): 114.
- 61Nassar JM, Khan SM, Villalva DR, Nour MM, Almuslem AS, Hussain MM. Compliant plant wearables for localized microclimate and plant growth monitoring. npj Flex Electron. 2018; 2(1): 24. doi:10.1038/s41528-018-0039-8
- 62Kulyk B, Silva BFR, Carvalho AF, et al. Laser-induced graphene from paper by ultraviolet irradiation: humidity and temperature sensors. Adv Mater Technol. 2022; 7(7):2101311.
- 63Lan L, le X, Dong H, Xie J, Ying Y, Ping J. One-step and large-scale fabrication of flexible and wearable humidity sensor based on laser-induced graphene for real-time tracking of plant transpiration at bio-interface. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020; 165:112360.
- 64Farahani H, Wagiran R, Hamidon MN. Humidity sensors principle, mechanism, and fabrication technologies: a comprehensive review. Sensors. 2014; 14(5): 7881-7939.
- 65Crowe E, Scott C, Cameron S, Cundell JH, Davis J. Developing wound moisture sensors: opportunities and challenges for laser-induced graphene-based materials. J Compos Sci. 2022; 6(6): 176.
- 66Zhou G, Byun JH, Oh Y, et al. Highly sensitive wearable textile-based humidity sensor made of high-strength, single-walled carbon nanotube/poly (vinyl alcohol) filaments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017; 9(5): 4788-4797.
- 67Lv C, Hu C, Luo J, et al. Recent advances in graphene-based humidity sensors. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(3): 422.
- 68Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 163(2): 257-268.
- 69Semenza GL. Vascular responses to hypoxia and ischemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010; 30(4): 648-652.
- 70Ruangsetakit C, Chinsakchai K, Mahawongkajit P, Wongwanit C, Mutirangura P. Transcutaneous oxygen tension: a useful predictor of ulcer healing in critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care. 2010; 19(5): 202-206.
- 71Ochoa M, Rahimi R, Zhou J, et al. Integrated sensing and delivery of oxygen for next-generation smart wound dressings. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2020; 6(1): 46. doi:10.1038/s41378-020-0141-7
- 72RoyChoudhury S, Umasankar Y, Jaller J, et al. Continuous monitoring of wound healing using a wearable enzymatic uric acid biosensor. J Electrochem Soc. 2018; 165(8): B3168-B3175.
- 73Fernandez ML, Upton Z, Edwards H, Finlayson K, Shooter GK. Elevated uric acid correlates with wound severity. Int Wound J. 2012; 9(2): 139-149.
- 74Fernandez ML, Upton Z, Shooter GK. Uric acid and xanthine oxidoreductase in wound healing. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014; 16: 1-7.
- 75Arcangeli D, Gualandi I, Mariani F, et al. Smart bandaid integrated with fully textile OECT for uric acid real-time monitoring in wound exudate. ACS Sens. 2023; 8(4): 1593-1608.
- 76Gao N, Yu J, Tian Q, et al. Application of PEDOT: PSS and its composites in electrochemical and electronic chemosensors. Chem. 2021; 9(4): 79.
- 77Jones EM, Cochrane CA, Percival SL. The effect of pH on the extracellular matrix and biofilms. Adv Wound Care. 2015; 4(7): 431-439.
- 78Guinovart T, Valdés-Ramírez G, Windmiller JR, Andrade FJ, Wang J. Bandage-based wearable potentiometric sensor for monitoring wound pH. Electroanalysis. 2014; 26(6): 1345-1353.
- 79Mirani B, Hadisi Z, Pagan E, et al. Smart dual-sensor wound dressing for monitoring cutaneous wounds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 12(18):2203233. doi:10.1002/adhm.202203233
- 80Wu K, Wu X, Chen M, Wu H, Jiao Y, Zhou C. H2O2-responsive smart dressing for visible H2O2 monitoring and accelerating wound healing. Chem Eng J. 2020; 387:124127.
- 81Wang H, Wu T, Li M, Tao Y. Recent advances in nanomaterials for colorimetric cancer detection. J Mater Chem B. 2021; 9(4): 921-938.
- 82Pan N, Qin J, Feng P, Li Z, Song B. Color-changing smart fibrous materials for naked eye real-time monitoring of wound pH. J Mater Chem B. 2019; 7(16): 2626-2633.
- 83Zhou J, Yao D, Qian Z, et al. Bacteria-responsive intelligent wound dressing: simultaneous in situ detection and inhibition of bacterial infection for accelerated wound healing. Biomaterials. 2018; 161: 11-23.
- 84Yang P, Zhu Z, Zhang T, et al. Orange-emissive carbon quantum dots: toward application in wound pH monitoring based on colorimetric and fluorescent changing. Small. 2019; 15(44):1902823. doi:10.1002/smll.201902823
- 85Zheng K, Tong Y, Zhang S, et al. Flexible bicolorimetric polyacrylamide/chitosan hydrogels for smart real-time monitoring and promotion of wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2021; 31(34):2102599.
- 86Khan AA, Banwell PE, Bakker MC, Gillespie PG, McGrouther DA, Roberts AHN. Topical radiant heating in wound healing: an experimental study in a donor site wound model. Int Wound J. 2004; 1(4): 233-240.
- 87Nakagami G, Sanada H, Iizaka S, et al. Predicting delayed pressure ulcer healing using thermography: a prospective cohort study. J Wound Care. 2010; 19(11): 465-472.
- 88Martínez-Jiménez MA, Aguilar-García J, Valdés-Rodríguez R, et al. Local use of insulin in wounds of diabetic patients: higher temperature, fibrosis, and angiogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(6): 1015e-1019e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a806f0
- 89Cuthbertson D, Tilstone W. Effect of environmental temperature on the closure of full thickness skin wounds in the rat. Q J Exp Physiol. 1967; 52(3): 249-257.
- 90Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(19): 1209-1216.
- 91Lou D, Pang Q, Pei X, et al. Flexible wound healing system for pro-regeneration, temperature monitoring and infection early warning. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020; 162:112275.
- 92Zhang Y, Li T, Zhao C, et al. An integrated smart sensor dressing for real-time wound microenvironment monitoring and promoting angiogenesis and wound healing. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9: 2172.
- 93Saghazadeh S, Rinoldi C, Schot M, et al. Drug delivery systems and materials for wound healing applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018; 127: 138-166.
- 94Strazzieri-Pulido KC, Peres GRP, Campanili TCGF, de Gouveia Santos VLC. Incidence of skin tears and risk factors. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017; 44(1): 29-33.
- 95Bonifant H, Holloway S. A review of the effects of ageing on skin integrity and wound healing. Br J Community Nurs. 2019; 24(Sup3): S28-S33.
- 96Cutting K. Factors influencing wound healing. Nurs Stand. 1994; 8(50): 33-36.
- 97Guo H, Bai M, Zhu Y, et al. Pro-healing zwitterionic skin sensor enables multi-indicator distinction and continuous real-time monitoring. Adv Funct Mater. 2021; 31(50):2106406.
- 98Rao KR, Devi KP. Swelling controlled-release systems: recent developments and applications. Int J Pharm. 1988; 48(1–3): 1-13.
- 99Xu G, Lu Y, Cheng C, et al. Battery-free and wireless smart wound dressing for wound infection monitoring and electrically controlled on-demand drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater. 2021; 31(26):2100852.
- 100Lisa B. Biomaterials: polymers in controlled drug delivery. Med Plastics Biomater. Los Angeles, CA. Med Device Link, November edition, 1997.
- 101Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm sci. 2000; 89(7): 850-866.
- 102Langer R. Invited review polymeric delivery systems for controlled drug release. Chem Eng Commun. 1980; 6(1–3): 1-48.
- 103Derakhshandeh H, Aghabaglou F, McCarthy A, et al. A wirelessly controlled smart bandage with 3D-printed miniaturized needle arrays. Adv Funct Mater. 2020; 30(13):1905544.
- 104Ye J-J, Li LF, Hao RN, et al. Phase-change composite filled natural nanotubes in hydrogel promote wound healing under photothermally triggered drug release. Bioact Mater. 2023; 21: 284-298.
- 105Orida N, Feldman JD. Directional protrusive pseudopodial activity and motility in macrophages induced by extracellular electric fields. Cell Motil. 1982; 2(3): 243-255.
- 106Bourguignon GJ, Bourguignon LY. Electric stimulation of protein and DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts. FASEB J. 1987; 1(5): 398-402.
- 107Bourguignon GJ, Jy W, Bourguignon LY. Electric stimulation of human fibroblasts causes an increase in Ca2+ influx and the exposure of additional insulin receptors. J Cell Physiol. 1989; 140(2): 379-385.
- 108Falanga V. Electrical stimulation increases the expression of fibroblasts receptors for transforming growth factor-beta. J Invest Dermatol. 1987; 88: 488-492.
- 109Sheridan DM, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R. Imposition of a physiologic DC electric field alters the migratory response of human keratinocytes on extracellular matrix molecules. J Invest Dermatol. 1996; 106(4): 642-646.
- 110Thawer HA, Houghton PE. Effects of electrical stimulation on the histological properties of wounds in diabetic mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2001; 9(2): 107-115.
- 111Smith J, Romansky N, Vomero J, Davis RH. The effect of electrical stimulation on wound healing in diabetic mice. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1984; 74(2): 71-75.
- 112Stromberg BV. Effects of electrical currents on wound contraction. Ann Plast Surg. 1988; 21(2): 121.
- 113Mawson A, Mawson AR, Siddiqui FH, et al. Effect of high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation on sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension levels in the spinal cord injured. Spinal Cord. 1993; 31(5): 311-319. doi:10.1038/sc.1993.55
- 114Song JW, Ryu H, Bai W, et al. Bioresorbable, wireless, and battery-free system for electrotherapy and impedance sensing at wound sites. Sci Adv. 2023; 9(8):eade4687. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade4687
- 115Barman SR, Chan SW, Kao FC, et al. A self-powered multifunctional dressing for active infection prevention and accelerated wound healing. Sci Adv. 2023; 9(4):eadc8758. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adc8758. 36696504
- 116Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald G. The role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007; 20(1): 39-53.
- 117Wild T, Rahbarnia A, Kellner M, Sobotka L, Eberlein T. Basics in nutrition and wound healing. Nutrition. 2010; 26(9): 862-866.
- 118Mustoe TA, O'shaughnessy K, Kloeters O. Chronic wound pathogenesis and current treatment strategies: a unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(7S): 35S-41S.
- 119Fougère B, Boulanger E, Nourhashémi F, Guyonnet S, Cesari M. Retracted: chronic inflammation: accelerator of biological aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017; 72(9): 1218-1225.
- 120Yao X, Zhu G, Zhu P, et al. Omniphobic ZIF-8@ hydrogel membrane by microfluidic-emulsion-templating method for wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2020; 30(13):1909389. doi:10.1002/adfm.201909389
- 121Shi L, Liu X, Wang W, Jiang L, Wang S. A self-pumping dressing for draining excessive biofluid around wounds. Adv Mater. 2019; 31(5):1804187. doi:10.1002/adma.201804187
- 122Pang Q, Lou D, Li S, et al. Smart flexible electronics-integrated wound dressing for real-time monitoring and on-demand treatment of infected wounds. Adv Sci. 2020; 7(6):1902673.
- 123Shi Y, Zhou M, Zhao S, et al. Janus amphiphilic nanofiber membranes synergistically drive antibacterial and anti-inflammatory strategies for skin wound healing. Mater Des. 2023; 227:111778.
- 124Liu Y, Niu H, Wang C, et al. Bio-inspired, bio-degradable adenosine 5′-diphosphate-modified hyaluronic acid coordinated hydrophobic undecanal-modified chitosan for hemostasis and wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2022; 17: 162-177.
- 125Pang Q, Lou D, Li S, Wang G, Qiao B, Dong S, et al. Smart flexible electronics-integrated wound dressing for real-time monitoring and on-demand treatment of infected wounds. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020; 7(6): 1902673.
- 126Shi Y, Zhou M, Zhao S, Li H, Wang W, Cheng J, et al. Janus amphiphilic nanofiber membranes synergistically drive antibacterial and anti-inflammatory strategies for skin wound healing. Mater Des. 2023; 227: 111778.
- 127Liu Y, Niu H, Wang C, Yang X, Li W, Zhang Y, et al. Bio-inspired, bio-degradable adenosine 5′-diphosphate-modified hyaluronic acid coordinated hydrophobic undecanal-modified chitosan for hemostasis and wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2022; 17: 162–177.