Volume 29, Issue 11 pp. 1147-1154
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of donor ischaemic preconditioning in liver transplantation

Francis P. Robertson

Corresponding Author

Francis P. Robertson

Department of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

Correspondence

Mr. Francis Robertson, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, 9th Floor Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.

Tel.: 0207 794 0500;

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Louise J. Magill

Louise J. Magill

Department of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Graham P. Wright

Graham P. Wright

Department of Immunology, Craiglockhart Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Barry Fuller

Barry Fuller

Department of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Brian R. Davidson

Brian R. Davidson

Department of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 August 2016
Citations: 37

Summary

Ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) is a strategy to reduce ischaemia–reperfusion (IR) injury. Its benefit in human liver transplantation is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the current evidence for donor IPC in liver transplantation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving IPC of liver transplant donors. Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up until January 2015. Data retrieved included the primary outcomes of 1-year mortality, incidence of primary graft non-function (PGNF) and retransplantation. Secondary outcomes included aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on day 3 post-op. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous data and mean weighted ratios for continuous data. Ten studies included 593 patients (286 IPC; 307 control). IPC was associated with a reduction in mortality at 1 year (6% vs. 11%) although this was not statistically significant (OR 0.54, 95% C.I. 0.28–1.04, P = 0.06). The IPC group had a significantly lower day 3 AST level (WMD −66.41iU, P = 0.04). This meta-analysis demonstrates that IPC reduces liver injury following transplantation and produces a large reduction in 1-year mortality which was not statistically significant. Confirmation of clinical benefit from IPC requires an adequately powered prospective RCT.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.