Volume 62, Issue 11 pp. 2235-2244
TRANSFUSION PRACTICE

Factor eight inhibiting bypass activity for refractory bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A propensity-matched analysis

Stevan S. Pupovac

Stevan S. Pupovac

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Randy Levine

Randy Levine

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ashley T. Giammarino

Ashley T. Giammarino

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel Jacob Scheinerman

Samuel Jacob Scheinerman

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alan R. Hartman

Alan R. Hartman

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Derek R. Brinster

Derek R. Brinster

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan M. Hemli

Corresponding Author

Jonathan M. Hemli

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence

Jonathan M. Hemli, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 East 77th Street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10075, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 September 2022

Abstract

Background

Perioperative bleeding and transfusion have been associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. The use of factor eight inhibiting bypass activity (FEIBA) in managing bleeding after repair of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not previously been evaluated. We report our experience in utilizing FEIBA in ATAAD repair.

Study Design and Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent repair of ATAAD between July 2014 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, dependent upon whether or not they received FEIBA intraoperatively: “FEIBA” (n = 112) versus “no FEIBA” (n = 119). From this, 53 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed with respect to transfusion requirements and short-term clinical outcomes.

Results

Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11.7% (27 deaths), not significantly different between patient groups. Those patients who received FEIBA demonstrated reduced transfusion requirements for all types of blood products in the first 48 h after surgery as compared with the “no FEIBA” cases, including red blood cells, platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in major postoperative morbidity between the two groups. The FEIBA cohort did not demonstrate an increased incidence of thrombotic complications (stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism).

Discussion

When used as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding following repair of ATAAD, FEIBA appears to be effective in decreasing postoperative transfusion requirements whilst not negatively impacting clinical outcomes. These findings should prompt further investigation and validation via larger, multi-center, randomized trials.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Derek R. Brinster, MD, is a consultant for Terumo Aortic, Cook Medical, and W.L. Gore & Associates.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.