Volume 59, Issue 7 pp. 2282-2291
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATIONS

Alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease and underrecognition of accompanying delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions

Sarita Coleman

Sarita Coleman

Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Connie M. Westhoff

Connie M. Westhoff

Immunohematology and Genomics, New York Blood Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
David F. Friedman

David F. Friedman

Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Stella T. Chou

Corresponding Author

Stella T. Chou

Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Address reprint requests to: Stella T. Chou, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3615 Civic Center Boulevard, ARC 316D, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 April 2019
Citations: 34
This work was supported by the Doris Duke Innovations in Clinical Research Award Grants 2011097 and 2015133 (STC, CMW), National Heart Lung Blood Institute U01 HL134696 (STC, CMW) and by a generous donation from the DiGaetano family.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) often require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions but alloimmunization remains a significant complication. Alloantibodies can lead to delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) days to weeks after a RBC transfusion, but may be underrecognized in patients with chronic hemolysis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study aimed to determine the incidence and severity of DHTRs associated with new antibody detection in a cohort of 624 patients with SCD who received transfusion with C-, E-, and K-matched RBCs from primarily African American donors over a 14-year period. We identified potential DHTRs by the change in hemoglobin (Hb) and %HbS at baseline, before transfusion, and up to 30 days after the transfusion that preceded new antibody identification.

RESULTS

Laboratory evidence of a DHTR was associated with 54 of 178 evaluable antibodies at first detection (30%), among which less than half were recognized by the patient or provider at the time of the event. A DHTR was associated with 26% of Rh antibodies identified in patients receiving serologic Rh-matched RBCs, and 38% of non-Rh antibodies. Twenty-one of the 54 DHTRs (39%) were associated with a Hb decline greater than 1 g/dL lower than pretransfusion values. Among these 21 severe DHTRs, Rh specificities were identified in 10 of 12 DHTRs in chronically transfused patients, while non-Rh specificities were associated with seven of nine DHTRs in episodically transfused patients.

CONCLUSION

High clinical suspicion and monitoring for DHTRs is warranted, as they may be more common in patients with SCD than previously appreciated.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.