Volume 59, Issue 6 pp. 2093-2102
BLOOD COMPONENTS

Cryopreservation of UVC pathogen-inactivated platelets

Lauren Waters

Lauren Waters

Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

School of Life Sciences and Proteomics Core Facility, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew P. Padula

Matthew P. Padula

School of Life Sciences and Proteomics Core Facility, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Denese C. Marks

Denese C. Marks

Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Lacey Johnson

Corresponding Author

Lacey Johnson

Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Address reprint requests to: *Dr. Lacey Johnson, Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, 17 O'Riordan Street, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, Australia. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 February 2019
Citations: 16
The Australian government funds the Australian Red Cross Blood Service to provide blood, blood products, and services to the Australian community. This research was also supported by Macopharma Australia Pty. Ltd. LW was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship award (University of Technology Sydney) and top-up scholarship (Alexander Steele Young Memorial Lions Foundation Scholarship).
Correction added on 25th March 2019, after first online publication: Reference list updated.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extending the platelet (PLT) shelf life and enhancing product safety may be achieved by combining cryopreservation and pathogen inactivation (PI). Although studied individually, limited investigations into combining these treatments has been performed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of PI treating PLTs before cryopreservation on in vitro PLT quality and function.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

ABO-matched buffy coat–derived PLTs in PLT additive solution (SSP+; Macopharma) were pooled and split to form matched pairs (n = 8). One unit remained untreated and the other was treated with the THERAFLEX UV-Platelets System (UVC; Macopharma). For cryopreservation, 5% to 6% dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the PLTs, and they were frozen at −80°C. After being thawed, untreated cryopreserved PLTs (CPPs) and UVC-treated CPPs (UVC-CPPs) were resuspended in plasma. In vitro quality was assessed immediately after thawing and after 24 hours of room temperature storage.

RESULTS

UVC-CPPs had lower in vitro recovery compared to CPPs. By flow cytometry, PLTs demonstrated a similar abundance of GPIX (CD42a), GPIIb (CD41a), and GPIbα (CD42b-HIP1), while the activation of GPIIb/IIIa (PAC-1) was increased in UVC-CPPs compared to CPPs. UVC-CPPs demonstrated greater phosphatidylserine exposure (annexin V) and microparticle shedding but similar P-selectin (CD62P) abundance compared to CPPs. UVC-CPPs displayed similar functionality to CPPs when assessed using aggregometry, thromboelastography, and thrombin generation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of cryopreserving UVC-PI–treated PLT products. UVC-PI treatment may increase the susceptibility of PLTs to damage caused during cryopreservation, but this is more pronounced during postthaw storage at room temperature.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

DCM and LJ received funding from Macopharma to conduct this research. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.