Volume 32, Issue 3 pp. 521-532
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Changes in blood bone markers after the first and second bouts of whole-body eccentric exercises

Tsang-Hai Huang

Tsang-Hai Huang

Institute of Physical Education, Health and Leisure Studies, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazunori Nosaka

Kazunori Nosaka

Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Trevor C. Chen

Corresponding Author

Trevor C. Chen

Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, Taiwan

Correspondence

Trevor C. Chen, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, B.O. Box 97-71 Wenshan Wansheng, Taipei City 11699, Taiwan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 December 2021
Citations: 1

Abstract

The present study compared the first (EC1) and second (EC2) bouts of whole-body eccentric exercises to examine the effects of the magnitude of muscle damage on changes in blood bone markers. Fifteen sedentary young men performed nine eccentric exercises of arm, leg, and trunk muscles, and repeated them 2 weeks later. Blood samples were taken before and 2 h and 1–5 days following each bout to analyze plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity and myoglobin concentration, serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), type 1 C-terminal telopeptide (CTX-1), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), undercarboxylated-osteocalcin (ucOCN), carboxylated-osteocalcin (cOCN), and leptin concentrations. All except ucOCN changed significantly (< 0.05) after both bouts. When comparing bouts for peak changes, P1NP (bone formation marker) and CTX-1 (bone resorption marker) increased less after EC2 (peak: 137±96% and 7±6%, respectively) than after EC1 (146 ± 80% and 30 ± 21%, respectively), whereas BAP (bone formation marker) increased more after EC2 (18 ± 16%) than after EC1 (4 ± 15%) (< 0.05). Leptin (49 ± 58%) and cOCN (14 ± 10%) increased more (< 0.05) after EC2 than after EC1 (−30 ± 15%, 9 ± 26%). Significant (< 0.05) correlations were evident between peak CK activity and peak CTX-1 (r = 0.847), P1NP (r = 0.815), BAP (r = −0.707), ucOCN (r = 0.627), cCON (r = −0.759), and leptin (r = −0.740) changes after EC1, but many of these correlations disappeared after EC2. This was also found for the relationships between other muscle damage markers (myoglobin, muscle soreness, and muscle strength) and the bone markers. It was concluded that bone turnover was affected by eccentric exercise, but muscle damage was unfavorable for bone formation.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.