Volume 45, Issue 5 pp. 1132-1151
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Reexploring the conception of heat–health risk: From the perspectives of dimensionality and spatiality

Binbin Peng

Corresponding Author

Binbin Peng

Department of Emergency Management, School of Government, Center for Societal Risk and Public Crisis Management Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Correspondence

Binbin Peng, School of Government, Nanjing University, No. 163 Xianlin Ave, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Marccus D. Hendricks

Marccus D. Hendricks

Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience and Justice (SIRJ) Lab, School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory R. Hancock

Gregory R. Hancock

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, Center for Integrated Latent Variable Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 September 2024

Abstract

Extreme heat events are more frequent and intense as a result of global climate change, thus posing tremendous threats to public health. However, extant literature exploring the multidimensional features of heat–health risks from a spatial perspective is limited. This study revisits extreme heat–health risk and decomposes this concept by integrating multi-sourced datasets, identifying compositional features, examining spatial patterns, and comparing classified characteristics based on local conditions. Using Maryland as the focal point, we found that the components of heat–health risk are different from traditional risk dimensions (i.e., vulnerability, hazards, and exposure). Through a local-level clustering analysis, heat–health risks were compared with areas having similar features, and among those with different features. The findings suggest a new perspective for understanding the socio-environmental and socio-spatial features of heat–health risks. They also offer an apt example of applying cross-disciplinary methods and tools for investigating an ever-changing phenomenon. Moreover, the spatial classification mechanism provides insights about the underlying causes of heat–health risk disparities and offers reference points for decision-makers regarding identification of vulnerable areas, resource allocation, and causal inferences when planning for and managing extreme heat disasters.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.