Does size matter? An examination of problem gamblers’ skin conductance responses to large and small magnitude rewards
Corresponding Author
Lisa Lole
School of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia
Correspondence Lisa Lole, School of Psychology, Central Queensland University, University Drive, Branyan, QLD 4670, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCraig J. Gonsalvez
School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lisa Lole
School of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia
Correspondence Lisa Lole, School of Psychology, Central Queensland University, University Drive, Branyan, QLD 4670, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCraig J. Gonsalvez
School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Australia Research Council Linkage Grant, LP0776836
Abstract
Previous research has shown that individuals with substance use disorder equally value small and large magnitude rewards. This has led some researchers to conceptualize the problematic behaviors associated with this disorder as being, at least in part, caused by a deficiency in processing reward stimuli. Considering the documented similarities between substance use disorder and disordered gambling, the current study sought to investigate whether problem gamblers also display such an aberrant pattern of incentive processing. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) to small and large magnitude wins were recorded from 16 problem gamblers (PGs) and 16 healthy controls (HCs) while they completed a computer-simulated electronic gaming machine task. The results show that, while large wins elicited greater SCRs compared to small wins for the HC group, no difference in SCR amplitude was found following large and small wins in the PG group. These findings suggest that problem gamblers may be less effective at evaluating the value of incentives, and are discussed in terms of relevant theoretical frameworks.
REFERENCES
- Ahmed, S. H., & Koob, G. F. (1998). Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: Change in hedonic set point. Science, 282, 298–300. doi:10.1126/science.282.5387.298
- American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 Google Scholar
- Australian Institute for Primary Care. (2006). The changing electronic gaming machine industry and technology. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Gambling Research Panel.
- Barry, R. J. (1996). Preliminary process theory: Towards an integrated account of the psychophysiology of cognitive processes. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 56, 469–484.
- Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., Rushby, J. A., & Ploskova, E. (2004). EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 402–408. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00343-2
- Barry, R. J., Feldman, S., Gordon, E., Cocker, K. I., & Rennie, C. (1993). Elicitation and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response in a short interstimulus interval paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 247–253. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(93)90008-D
- Blanco, C., Orensanz-Munoz, L., Blanco-Jerez, C., & Saiz-Ruiz, J. (1996). Pathological gambling and platelet MAO activity: A psychobiological study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 119–121. doi:10.1017/S0033291706007410
-
Blaszczynski, A.,
Walker, M.,
Sharpe, L., &
Nower, L. (2008). Withdrawal and tolerance phenomenon in problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 8, 181–194. doi:10.1080/14459790802140007
10.1080/14459790802140007 Google Scholar
- Blum, K., Braverman, E. R., Holder, J. M., Lubar, J. F., Monastra, V. J., Miller, D., … Comings, D. E. (2000). Reward deficiency syndrome: A biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32, 1–112. doi:10.1080/02791072.2000.10736099
- Blum, K., Sheridan, P. J., Wood, R. C., Braverman, E. R., Chen, T. J. H., Cull, J. G., & Comings, D. E. (1996). The D2 dopamine receptor gene as a determinant of reward deficiency syndrome. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 89, 396–400.
- Brown, R. I. F. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 1001–1016. doi:10.3109/10826088609077251
-
Boucsein, W. (1992). Electrodermal activity. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5093-5
10.1007/978-1-4757-5093-5 Google Scholar
- Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
- de Ruiter, M. B., Veltman, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Sjoerds, Z., & van den Brink, W. (2009). Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34, 1027–1038. doi:10.1038/npp.2008.175
- Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03050.x
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
- Goldstein, R. Z., Parvaz, M. A., Malony, T., Alia-Klein, N., Woicik, P. A., Telang, F., … Volkow, N. D. (2008). Compromised sensitivity to monetary reward in current cocaine users: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 45, 705–713. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00670.x
- Goldstein, R. Z., Tomasi, D., Alia-Klein, N., Cottone, L. A., Zhang, L., Telang, F., & Volkow, N. D. (2007). Subjective sensitivity to monetary gradients is associated with frontolimbic activation to reward in cocaine abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87, 233–240. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.022
- Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & Van den Brink, W. (2006). Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84, 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.007
- Groot, P. F. C., de Geus, E. J. C., & de Vries, J. (1998). The ambulatory monitoring system manual. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit.
- Hewig, J., Kretschmer, N., Trippe, R., Hecht, H., Coles, M., Holroyd, C., & Miltner, W. (2010). Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 67, 781–783. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.009
-
Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 15–31. doi:10.1007/BF01019931
10.1007/BF01019931 Google Scholar
- Kamarajan, C., Rangaswamy, M., Tang, Y., Chorlian, D. B., Pandey, A. K., Roopesh, B. N., … Porjesz, B. (2010). Dysfunctional reward processing in male alcoholics: An ERP study during a gambling task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 576–590. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.11.019
- Lodge, D. J. (2011). The medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices differentially regulate dopamine system function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 1227–1236.
- Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Barry, R. J. (2015). Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126, 1295–1309. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.011
- Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Barry, R. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Problem gamblers are hyposensitive to wins: An analysis of skin conductance responses during actual gambling on electronic gaming machines. Psychophysiology, 51, 556–564. doi:10.1111/psyp.12198
- Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Barry, R. J., & De Blasio, F. M. (2013). Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 89, 390–398. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.011
- Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2012). Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology, 49, 154–163. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01290.x
- Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1971). Direct measurement of skin conductance: A proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology, 8, 656–672. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1971.tb00501.x
- Miedl, S. F., Fehr, T., Meyer, G., & Herrmann, M. (2010). Neurobiological correlates of problem gambling in a quasi-realistic blackjack scenario as revealed by fMRI. Psychiatry Research, 181, 165–173. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.11.008
- Millhouse, H., & Delfabbro, P. (2008). Investigating preferences for gaming machine features in problem and non-problem gamblers using a consumer choice methodology. Gambling Research, 20, 37–49.
- Nagai, Y., Critchley, H. D., Featherstone, E., Trimble, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex covaries with sympathetic skin conductance level: A physiological account of a ‘‘default mode’’ of brain function. NeuroImage, 22, 243–251. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.019
- Nemoda, Z., Szekely, A., & Sasvari-Szekely, M. (2011). Psychopathological aspects of dopaminergic gene polymorphisms in adolescence and young adulthood. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1665–1686. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.002
- Noble, E. P. (2003). D2 dopamine receptor gene in psychiatric and neurologic disorders and its phenotypes. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 116, 103–125. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.10005
- Oberg, S. A. K., Christie, G. J., & Tata, M. S. (2011). Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3768–3775. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.037
- Porjesz, B., Begleiter, H., Bihari, B., & Kissin, B. (1987). Event-related brain potentials to high incentive stimuli in abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol, 4, 283–287. doi:10.1016/0741-8329(87)90024-3
-
Raskin D. C. (1973). Attention and arousal. In W. F. Prokasy & D. C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research (pp. 125–155). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-565950-5.50007-7
10.1016/B978-0-12-565950-5.50007-7 Google Scholar
- Reuter, J., Raedler, T., Rose, M., Hand, I., Glascher, J., & Buchel, C. (2005). Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 147–148. doi:10.1038/nn1378
-
Roth, W. T. (1983). A comparison of P300 and skin conductance response. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in ERP research: Endogenous components. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62039-7 Google Scholar
- Sharpe, L., & Tarrier, N. (1993). Towards a cognitive-behavioral theory of problem gambling. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 407–412. doi:10.1192/bjp.162.3.407
- Sudman, S. (2001). Examining substance abuse data collection methodologies. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 695–716. doi:10.1177/002204260103100306
- van Holst, R. J., Veltman, D. J., Büchel, C., van den Brink, W., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012). Distorted expectancy coding in problem gambling: Is the addictive in the anticipation? Biological Psychiatry, 71, 741–748. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.030
- Walker, M. (2004). The seductiveness of poker machines. Gambling Research, 16, 52–66.
- Wareham, J. D., & Potenza, M. N. (2010). Pathological gambling and substance use disorders. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36, 242–247. doi:10.3109/00952991003721118
- Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2009). Psychophysiological responses to win and loss events during electronic gambling machine (EGM) play: A pilot investigation. Gambling Research, 21, 22–34.
- Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Capturing SCL and HR changes to win and loss events during gambling on electronic machines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 265–272. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.008