Volume 24, Issue 2 pp. 227-239
Review Article
Full Access

Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: understanding the physiological mechanisms

U. K. Ghosh

U. K. Ghosh

Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
M. N. Islam

M. N. Islam

Department of Agro-Processing, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh

Search for more papers by this author
M. N. Siddiqui

M. N. Siddiqui

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh

Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES)-Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
X. Cao

X. Cao

School of Chemistry and Food Science, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China

Search for more papers by this author
M. A. R. Khan

Corresponding Author

M. A. R. Khan

Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh

Correspondence

M. A. R. Khan, Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur-1706, Bangladesh.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2021
Citations: 130

Abstract

Abiotic stresses have a detrimental impact on plant growth and productivity and are a major threat to sustainable crop production in rapidly changing environments. Proline, an important amino acid, plays an important role in maintaining the metabolism and growth of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Many insights indicate a positive relationship between proline accumulation and tolerance of plants to various abiotic stresses. Because of its metal chelator properties, it acts as a molecular chaperone, an antioxidative defence molecule that scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as having signalling behaviour to activate specific gene functions that are crucial for plant recovery from stresses. It also acts as an osmoprotectant, a potential source to acquire nitrogen as well as carbon, and plays a significant role in the flowering and development of plants. Overproduction of proline in plant cells contributes to maintaining cellular homeostasis, water uptake, osmotic adjustment and redox balance to restore the cell structures and mitigate oxidative damage. Many reports reveal that transgenic plants, particularly those overexpressing genes tailored for proline accumulation, exhibit better adaptation to abiotic stresses. Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive update on proline biosynthesis and accumulation in plants and its putative regulatory roles in mediating plant defence against abiotic stresses. Additionally, the current and future directions in research concerning manipulation of proline to induce gene functions that appear promising in genetics and genomics approaches to improve plant adaptive responses under changing climate conditions are also highlighted.

INTRODUCTION

Abiotic stresses on plants have become more frequent and severe due to rapid global climate change (Surabhi, 2018; Ali et al. 2019). Commonly, plants are confronted by different abiotic stresses which interrupt cellular membrane and developmental processes throughout their life cycle (Jeandroz & Lamotte, 2017; Aamer et al. 2018; Cheng et al. 2018; Ghaffari et al. 2019; Hasanuzzaman et al. 2019; Kerchev et al. 2020; Mohammadi et al. 2020). Abiotic stresses, for instance, drought, salinity and heavy metals, are responsible for the production of excess quantities of reactive oxygen species (ROS), peroxidation of lipids, activation of antioxidant systems and accretion of osmolytes (Kazemi-Shahandashti & Maali-Amiri, 2018; Yang & Guo, 2018; Khan et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2019; Ghosh et al. 2021).

Plant cells normally allow the influx, gathering and synthesis of proline and accumulate it to maintain homeostasis and keep the cell turgid for growth and development in abiotic stress environments (Parida & Das, 2005; Sharma & Dietz, 2006; Burg & Ferraris, 2008). Proline acts as a chelator and can chelate heavy metals in plants (in vitro condition) and form a nontoxic metal–proline complex (Sharma et al. 1998). It also acts as a molecular chaperone, preserving protein integrity and speeding up the activity of many enzymes (Rajendrakumar et al. 1997). The oxidation of one proline molecule produces 30 ATP equivalents, and this amino acid is required for sustaining high energy-requiring processes (Atkinson, 1977). In response to harsh environmental conditions, increased synthesis of proline has widely been observed (Ashraf & Harris, 2004; Hoque et al. 2007; Urano et al. 2009; Lugan et al. 2010).

Proline lessens the damaging effects of a number of abiotic stresses and protects cells; increased proline accumulation is also regarded as a reflection of abiotic stress tolerance. Normally, plants recognize stress through their root systems and transmit signals to formulate or unify protective components in many parts to alter their physiological and morphological settings (Siopongco et al. 2015). One of the most important responses of plants to osmotic and oxidative stress is the biosynthesis and accumulation of proline.

The accretion of proline is the outcome of different stress signalling pathways (phytohormones, calcium signalling and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways). Proline is essential for the existence of plants under an abiotic stress environment. The biosynthesis of proline has already been studied in detail (Trovato et al. 2008; Verslues & Sharma, 2010; Feng et al. 2016). Furthermore, multiple studies have indicated that plants with modified metabolism (genetically engineered plants) to induce proline biosynthesis have improved performance and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Thus, controlling cellular osmotic balance, ion homeostasis and activation of enzymatic, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidant systems, are the most important conserved mechanisms that confer stress tolerance in plants (Zhu, 2001; Munns, 2002; Vinocur & Altman, 2005).

In this review, efforts have been made to provide a comprehensive update related to proline biosynthesis and metabolism in plant responses to abiotic stress conditions. In addition, the regulatory roles of proline in physiological and phytohormonal associations to induce flowering and developmental processes that confer abiotic stresses are addressed. The current and future trends in research aiming to improve plant performance, especially under abiotic stress scenarios using cutting-edge genomics and biotechnological tools, are also reviewed.

OVERVIEW OF PROLINE BIOSYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM IN CROP PLANTS

Proline is one of the most studied osmoprotectants in plants (Rejeb et al. 2014; Kaur & Asthir, 2015; Zandalinas et al. 2018). Biosynthesis of proline usually occurs either through the glutamate pathway or the ornithine pathway (Trovato et al. 2008; Verslues & Sharma, 2010). Proline can be accumulated de novo, through decreased degradation, or both (Dos Reis et al. 2012). Figure 1 depicts the process of proline biosynthesis and its diverse involvement in mediating abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Proline synthesis occurs in the cytoplasm and/or chloroplasts of plants: glutamate, with the help of the P5CS enzyme, is then reduced to L-glutamate γ-semialdehyde (GSA) and then further changed into pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C). Thus, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR) plays a major role in reducing P5C to proline. In mitochondria, however, the action of proline dehydrogenase or proline oxidase enzymes results in the formation of pyrroline-5-carboxylate from proline and pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (P5CDH), which finally replenishes glutamate from P5C. In a different approach, proline can also be produced from ornithine, which is initially transmitted via the ornithine-delta-aminotransferase (OAT) enzyme, delivering GSA and P5C, which are then converted to proline (Verbruggen & Hermans, 2008; Liang et al. 2013; Rai & Penna, 2013; Iqbal et al. 2014).

Details are in the caption following the image
An overview showing the multifaceted role of proline in plant adaptive physiological processes mediating abiotic stress tolerance. Upon ‘seeing’ the abiotic stress signal, the related signalling pathway is initiated and results in the induction of stress-responsive transcription factors which, consequently, upregulate stress-responsive genes related to biosynthesis and accumulation of proline to protect and increase plant tolerance to encountered abiotic stresses.

The glutamine pathway for proline synthesis functions under osmotic stress conditions, whereas the ornithine pathway works under limited nitrogen situations as well as seedling development in plants (Roosens et al. 1998; Armengaud et al. 2004). There are two genes involves in the encoding: P5CS and P5CR in most plants (Furlan et al. 2020).

In general, the conversion product of P5C is responsible for generation of a huge amount of ROS during the biosynthesis of proline (Hellmann et al. 2000; Szekely et al. 2008). Therefore, if the stress is relieved, plants should degrade ROS promptly. Inside mitochondria, two genes encode PDH during catabolism of proline, whereas just one gene, P5CDH, has been reported in Arabidopsis and in Nicotiana tabacum plants (Kiyosue et al. 1996; Verbruggen et al. 1996; Ribarits et al. 2007). The alternation between proline and glutamate is often known as the ‘proline cycle’ (Verslues & Sharma, 2010).

In general, the only way for plants to degrade an excess amount of proline seems to be the catabolic pathway that includes PDH and P5CDH. Deuschle et al. (2001) and Nanjo et al. (2003) demonstrated that Arabidopsis PDH mutants (missing a useful PDH) and P5CDH mutants (without a functioning P5CDH) were oversensitive to exogenously supplied proline and were unable to remove excess proline. P5CDH overproduction increases the rate of P5C degradation, thereby affecting the death of cells (Hellmann et al. 2000; Deuschle et al. 2001). Proline can be synthesized in various subcellular compartments, depending on environmental conditions (Szabados & Savoure, 2010). Research has shown that proline biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is regulated by P5CS2 (Szekely et al. 2008; Szabados & Savoure, 2010), which is found in meristematic tissue division (Madan, 1995; Deuschle et al. 2001; Tripathi & Gaur, 2004). The stress-induced P5CS1 gene in Arabidopsis regulates proline synthesis in chloroplasts (Savoure et al. 1995; Strizhov et al. 2003; Szekely et al. 2008; Szabados & Savoure, 2010). In abiotic stress environments, an upgraded rate of proline biosynthesis has been identified, which can maintain a low NADPH:NADP+ ratio, adding support to the electron stream between excitation hubs of the photosynthetic process, maintain the redox equilibrium and reduce photoinhibition and damage to the photosynthetic apparatus in chloroplasts (Hare & Cress, 1997).

HOW PROLINE RESPONDS IN VARYING ENVIRONMENTS AND A BIOENGINEERING APPROACH: DEVELOPMENT OF PROLINE-INDUCED STRESS-TOLERANT CROPS

Salinity

Salt stress is one of the key constraints restricting agricultural production, affecting at least 20% of arable land worldwide (Zhu & Gong, 2014; Rizwan et al. 2015). Salinity is responsible for inducing osmotic and ionic (high Na+/K+ ratio) stresses, which cause water deficit, phytotoxicity and nutrient imbalance in plants (Sheldon et al. 2017; Safdar et al. 2019; van Zelm et al. 2020). Salt increases oxygenase activity by impeding the carboxylase action of RuBPcase under saline conditions. At high proline concentrations, the oxygenase activity is potentially reduced. Hence, proline plays a key role in shielding photosynthetic activity during abiotic stress (Bohnert et al. 1992; Rajendrakumar et al. 1994; Sivakumar et al. 2000; Hamilton & Heckathorn, 2001). Reducing expansion of the leaf surface is the most common response to salt stress (Munns, 2002), and exogenously applied proline can improve salt tolerance in crop plants (Heuer, 2016). For instance, foliar application of proline enhanced plant growth and yield traits in salts tressed Zea mays (Alam et al. 2016). The combined application of nitrogen and sulphur also improved salt stress impact on photosynthetic activity of plants with upgraded production of proline (Rais & Masood, 2013). In halophyte species of different families, osmotic modification mediated by accumulating of proline has widely been reported (Deuschle et al. 2001; Lokhande et al. 2010; Cvikrova et al. 2013; Slama et al. 2015). Application of exogenous proline reduced the Na+/ K+ ratio in salt-affected rice plants (Nounjan et al. 2012).

Application of proline suppresses the uptake of Na-induced trisodium-8-hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrenetrisulfonic acid (an apoplastic tracer) and accretion of Na+ (Sobahan et al. 2009). In saline zones with an increased degree of proline accumulation, the salt-tolerant Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) rice variety, dhan54, showed increased salt tolerance (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2014). Crop plants exposed to salt stress had been found to increase activity of ROS scavenging enzymes, such as peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase, leading to improved levels of proline generation (Hoque et al. 2008; Islam et al. 2009). Several studies have found that proline is associated with increasing salinity tolerance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) (Hayat et al. 2012), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) (Kahlaoui et al. 2018), pea (Pisum sativum) (Shahid et al. 2014).

Drought

Research has demonstrated that drought induces proline accumulation in numerous plants and that exogenous proline application contributes significantly to ensure drought tolerance in crop plants (Yamada et al. 2005; Vendruscolo et al. 2007; El-Beltagi et al. 2020). Mohammadkhani & Heidari (2008) showed that proline content in Zea mays L. leaves was 1.56–3.13 times higher than in control leaves under dehydration. In another experiment, a 56-day exposure to water deficit resulted in a 2.4-fold increase in shoot proline levels of drought-stressed oak compared to control shoots (Oufir et al. 2009).

Ali et al. (2013) reported that exogenous proline application significantly increased sugar, oil, moisture, protein, fibre and ash content in seeds under drought conditions. In addition, the content of oleic and linoleic acid and concentrations of antioxidants, viz. flavonoids carotenoids, phenolics and tocopherols, increased significantly. Proline significantly improved maize tolerance to drought (60% field capacity, 15 days) in a study using exogenous proline (30 and 60 mM as foliar spray) by enhancing growth and development, photosynthesis rate, sub-stomatal CO2, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic pigment levels in drought stress scenarios (Ali et al. 2007). Moreover, previous studies indicated that proline caused drought tolerance in lentil (Lens culinaris) (Molla et al. 2014; Bekka et al. 2018).

Flooding/waterlogging

Flooding is abiotic stress that drastically affects the normal growth, physiological functions and yield of plants (Jackson & Ram, 2003; Normile, 2008; Jackson et al. 2009; Bailey-Serres et al. 2010). Waterlogging causes hypoxic conditions around the root system of plants, affecting water and nutrient uptake, carbohydrate mobilization, ROS metabolism, production of superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical, as well as the peroxidation of membrane lipids, resulting in mechanical damage to the water-stressed parts (Ram et al. 1999; Jackson & Colmer, 2005; Wu et al. 2013; Pucciariello et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2015; Arbona et al. 2017). Reduced oxygen, sunlight and carbon dioxide in flooded conditions impede photosynthesis and aerobic respiration, resulting in a scarcity of carbohydrates, thus limiting growth and development of crop plants (Voesenek & Bailey-Serres, 2013). To cope with this flood stress, plants use different morphological, physiological and anatomical changes to protect themselves (Colmer & Voesenek, 2009; Striker & Colmer, 2017). The most common but important morphological adaptation to flooding is the growth of an adventitious root system that aids in uptake of water and nutrients under such submerged states (Zhang et al. 2017). The generation of aerenchyma in plant tissues is an anatomical response, which allows the passage of oxygen from shoots to root tissues (Colmer, 2003).

When exposed to flooding, there was an increase in proline content in rice plants through adjusting osmotic potential in the cytoplasm (Chanu & Sarangthem, 2015). In response to waterlogging, there was also an increase of GR (glutathione reductase) activity in citrus seedlings (Arbona et al. 2008). According to Barickman et al. (2019), there was a 58.9% increase in proline concentration in leaf tissue of waterlogged cucumber plants in comparison with non-waterlogged conditions.

Heavy metals

On exposure to heavy metals, increased accumulation of proline has been reported in various plant species (Chen et al. 2001; Zengin & Munzuroglu, 2005; Radic et al. 2010; Sofy et al. 2020). In plants, prior to entering the xylem and being moved to the shoot, heavy metals in the soil can enter through the roots by either symplastic or apoplastic pathways (Lux et al. 2011). Delivery through the phloem can also play a decisive role in metal transport (Mendoza-Cozatl et al. 2011). Several experiments revealed that metal toxicity leads to leaf chlorosis, growth reduction, changes in secondary structure of proteins, necrosis and modifications to the redox status of the cell, ultimately leading to plant death (Nies, 1999; Sandalio et al. 2001; Nazar et al. 2012; Asgher et al. 2013; Kapoor & Bhardwaj, 2014).

Proline eliminates ROS and increases the function of various antioxidant enzymes (Islam et al. 2009; Hayat et al. 2013). In cells of Nicotiana tabacum, exogenous proline can restore membrane integrity (Islam et al. 2009). Proline pretreated rice plants displayed tolerance to mercury through removing ROS. Similarly, cadmium (Cd) tolerance in Triticum aestivum increased proline content (Khan et al. 2015).

Proline expression is amplified under all test concentrations of Cd and can chelate Cd in a non-hazardous complex of Cd–proline (Sharma et al. 1998; Aly, 2012). Exposure to heavy metal stress leads to accumulation of proline and accelerates the development of phytochelatins that chelate metals and thus reduce metal toxicity (De Knecht et al. 1994). Toxicity of Hg2+ in rice (Oryza sativa) is also reduced by proline pretreatment, which helps to eliminate ROS, particularly H2O2 (Doke, 1997). However, in fighting metal toxicity, although application of proline typically prevents the damaging effects at optimal doses, at higher doses it can impede growth (Ehsanpour & Fatahian, 2003; Nanjo et al. 2003; Ashraf et al. 2008). An early study found that proline mitigates selenium toxicity (Aggarwal et al. 2011) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L).

Extreme temperature

Heat stress is becoming a major agricultural problem as global temperatures rise, affecting crop yield and causing morpho-anatomical, physiological, biochemical and genetic changes in plants (Wahid et al. 2007). Heat affects plants at different development stages, and high temperature reduces seed germination, photosynthesis and respiration, as well as membrane permeability (Xu et al. 2013). Both high and low temperatures have a significant impact on plant growth and development. Any deviation from optimum temperature results in membrane disturbances, fluctuations in protein content, enzyme activity and amino acids, leading to electrolyte leakage from cells (Hayat et al. 2012). Low-temperature treatment of tropical and subtropical plants, e.g. soybean and mung bean, resulted in severe physiological and biochemical modifications, particularly associated with ROS (Mittler, 2002). Seed treated with low temperature had lower germination as well as inhibited growth, thus reducing the yield (Larcher, 1981). In A. thaliana, exogenously applied proline enhanced seed germination (Hare et al. 2003). Moreover, exogenous application of proline improved tolerance to chilling stress at 5 °C for 2–6 days (Hayat et al. 2012).

Exogenous proline is a reactive oxygen scavenger, reduces lipid peroxidation and can also act as a source of carbon and nitrogen that improves seedling growth in Vigna radiata exposed to chilling stress (Posmyk & Janas, 2007). Treatment of chickpea with proline alleviated the production of H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) at 40/35 °C and 45/40 °C (Kaushal et al. 2011). Exogenous application of proline enhanced the resilience of barley leaves to high temperatures (45 °C) by stabilizing complex II of the electron transport system (Oukarroum et al. 2012).

Plant–microbial signalling to alleviate abiotic stress toxicity

The important role of microorganisms in alleviating abiotic stresses in plants has become an area of great concern in the recent decades (Nadeem et al. 2014). Microbial diversity is the most important and complex living system on Earth. Due to rapid changes in climate conditions, it has now become imperative to define and interpret plant–microbe relationships in terms of protection against abiotic stresses (Meena et al. 2017). Microbes, with their intrinsic metabolic and genetic capacities, can contribute to alleviating abiotic stresses in plants (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2014). The plant microbiome delivers fundamental support to plants in acquiring nutrients, resisting diseases and tolerating abiotic stresses (Turner et al. 2013). The microbiome interactions with plants provoke various local and systemic responses that improve plant metabolic capacity to fight abiotic stress (Nguyen et al. 2016).

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) led to more proline accretion in leaves and increased P5CS activity under waterlogged conditions, and the AMF Funneliformis mosseae made a positive contribution to waterlogging tolerance of peach plants by promoting proline and chlorophyll biosynthesis (Tuo et al. 2015). Kumari et al. (2015) inoculated soybean with Pseudomonas sp. AK-1 and Bacillus sp. SJ-5 that induced systemic tolerance (IST) in response to salinity stress through proline accumulation. Increased proline accumulation was also reported upon inoculation of wheat with the bacterial endophytes Azospirillum sp. and B. aquimaris SU8 that alleviated salinity stress (Zarea et al. 2012; Bal et al. 2013). Maximum accumulation of proline (298 μg g−1 fresh weight) was seen under 1.5 M NaCl stress by addition of Staphylococcus haemolyticus (ST-9), although further accumulation of proline decreased with increasing salt concentration (Ramos-Cormenzana, 2020). Tomato plants inoculated with Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis exhibited tolerance to chilling stress through increases in proline content and antioxidant enzymes (Subramanian et al. 2016). Plants treated with Bacillus strains increased proline content when exposed to a water stress, possibly due to the upregulation of P5CS, which is related to biosynthesis of proline, and inhibition of expression of the gene ProDH, which is mainly involved in metabolism of proline (Yoshiba et al. 1997).

PROLINE-RELATED METABOLIC FLUX

Carbohydrate regulation

The production and accumulation of soluble sugars directly contributes to radical scavenging, osmotic adjustment, carbon storage and stabilization of protein structures (Huisinga, 1964; Dubey & Singh, 1999). Sugars are important for osmotic adjustment in several plant species and function as osmoprotectants, substrates for growth and regulators of gene expression during abiotic stress (Koch, 1996; Ghosh et al. 2021). Increased total soluble sugar (TSS) content of plants under salinity stress is one of the vital defence strategies to cope with salinity stress. An increased amount of proline and TSS in wheat inoculated with PGPR (Plant Growth Regulating Rhizobacteria) significantly improved osmotolerance (Upadhyay et al. 2011). Some rice cultivars and Medicago species showed increases in TSS under saline conditions (López et al. 2008). Additionally, the enhanced root colonizing capacity of Pseudomonas sp. and ability to produce exopolysaccharides (EPS) leads to enhanced salt tolerance (Etesami, 2019). An increase in trehalose has also been found in drought-stressed Vigna sinensis (Vurukonda et al. 2016).

Exopolysaccharide secretion by PGPR forms an organo-mineral sheath around the microbial cells, which enables specific bacteria to survive under abiotic stress conditions and confers drought tolerance to plants through osmotic and intracellular adjustment (Sandhya et al. 2009). Under stress conditions, bacteria persist in the form of biofilm communities, providing an extracellular matrix for an infinite range of macromolecules. It has been suggested that the major components of biofilms in the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis are polysaccharides and Tas A protein, and mutation of these components have severe effects on biofilm production (Timmusk, 2003).

Arabidopsis plants produce a large amount of raffinose and galactinol, which are involved in tolerance to drought, high salinity and cold stresses, and these also act as signals to mediate abiotic stress responses (Valluru and Van den Ende, 2011).

Polyamines

Polyamines are found in living cells and participate in various cellular mechanisms (Ghosh et al. 2021). Levels of polyamines and proline are linked as their biosynthetic and catabolic pathways share some common intermediates (Aziz et al. 1998). During metabolic processing, oxidative deamination of putrescine yields pyrroline, which can be used as a substrate for proline synthesis (Bagni & Tassoni, 2001). In contrast, accumulated proline can be catabolized to glutamate, which provides a substrate in polyamine synthesis (Nanjo et al. 2003). Transgenic plants containing higher levels of proline and polyamines have been shown to have better abiotic stress tolerance (Simon-Sarkadi et al. 2006b). In plants, putrescine, spermidine and spermine are the most abundant polyamines and have a significant role in mitigating different abiotic stresses (de Oliveira et al. 2017). The cationic behaviour of polyamines allows them to work together with all negatively charged cellular components, such as DNA, RNA, phospholipids and proteins (Liu, 2006; Pang et al. 2007; Kusano et al. 2008). Polyamines are also well known for their ability to block ion channels (the mode in which they achieve osmotic adjustment through inorganic ions) and scavenging ROS in plants. Putrescine, spermidine and spermine improve drought tolerance (Sadeghipour, 2019) by increasing net photosynthesis, soluble protein content, relative water content and salinity tolerance in Vigna radiata (Nahar et al. 2016). An increase in levels of putrescine has been observed in response to chilling stress in wheat (Nadeau et al. 1987). Exogenous application of spermidine and putrescine increase postharvest shelf-life of Capsicum annuum (Patel et al. 2019).

Aromatic compounds (e.g. 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline)

The compound 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (2AP) is the main compound in aromatic rice varieties. The Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) gene is reported to control proline synthesis in plants and is the precursor of 2AP (Kaikavoosi et al. 2015). 2AP is the main flavour compound of fragrant rice varieties. with a pop-corn-like aroma (Buttery et al. 1982; Buttery, 1983). Increases in the level of 2AP were found through feeding rice seedlings and calli with amino acids, such as proline, ornithine and glutamic acid (Yoshihashi et al. 2002a). Proline is a prominent amino acid that leads to maximum increases in 2AP levels. Increasing 2AP and GABA content was observed in rice grains during shade treatment at grain filling stage in Yuxiangyouzhan and Nongxiang 18 rice varieties of south China (Mo et al. 2015).

Rice plants accumulate significantly larger amounts of precursors like proline when exposed to abiotic stress, particularly drought and salinity stress at vegetative and reproductive stages, and these effectively enhance 2AP content in rice grains (Yoshihashi et al. 2002b; Poonlaphdecha et al. 2012). Recently, molecular mechanisms like RNAi have been employed to silence the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (BADH2) gene and induce 2AP in japonica rice (Niu et al. 2008). The upregulation of P5CS in aromatic rice might be associated with increases in Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid (P5C), thus resulting in the accumulation of a considerable amount of 2AP (Huang et al. 2008). Current studies suggest two pathways for 2AP biosynthesis in rice – via proline (Bradbury et al. 2008) and glutamic acid (Huang et al. 2008) – but both involve 1-pyrroline. This was also found to be an important intermediate in the formation of 2AP through the Maillard reaction (Hofmann & Schieberle, 1998).

MECHANISMS OF ACTION THROUGH PHYTOHORMONES

In many plant species, in reaction to osmotic stress caused by abscisic acid (ABA), proline accumulation increases (Hare et al. 1999). The use of exogenous ABA increases O-acetyl-L- serine concentrations and, consequently, may lead indirectly to proline accretion. ABA treatment of Solanum tuberosum increased the PCS1 transcript and phytochelatin synthase activity in roots (Stroinski et al. 2013). Therefore, ABA has been suggested to be responsible for the initiation of proline accumulation in stressed plants (Mäkelä et al. 2003).

The increased activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ABA and proline prevent oxidative damage in seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris (Bahmani et al. 2012). ABA enhances nitrate reductase enzyme activity in Phaseolus aconitifolius cotyledons (Sankhla & Huber, 1975). In the Medicago truncatula LATD mutant, a correlation between ABA and signalling behaviour of nitrogen has been identified (Yendrek et al. 2010). In addition, the role of calcium (Ca) on proline accumulation and ABA lead to increases in calcium in the cytosol of guard cells (MacRobbie, 1992; Grabov & Blatt, 1998). Table 1 shows the response to phytohormones and the effects on proline accumulation.

Table 1. Phytohormone-mediated changes in proline accumulation in plants.
Phytohormone Response of proline Plant Reference
Ethylene Triticum aestivum Khan et al. 2015
Ethylene-insensitive plant Lycopersicon esculentum Nr mutant Gratao et al. 2012
Salicylic acid Cucumus melo Zhang et al. 2015
Perennial ryegrass Wang et al. 2013
Abscisic acid Phaseolus vulgaris Bahmani et al. 2012
Nitric oxide Triticum aestivum Basalah et al. 2013
Perennial ryegrass Wang et al. 2013
Brassinosteroid Raphanus sativus Anuradha & Rao, 2008
Phaseolus vulgaris Rady, 2011
  • ↑: increase; ↓: decrease.

External application of salicylic acid (SA) significantly decreased development of the superoxide anion and peroxidation of lipids in response to cadmium stress (Hayat et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2015). SA also increased the assimilation of nitrogen and sulphur during salt stress (Nazar et al. 2011). Basalah et al. (2013) found that by enhancing proline accumulation together with SA and nitric oxide (NO) helps in relieving the negative effects of metal stress. In general, NO is responsible for upregulation of the enzymes required for proline synthesis (P5CS) leading to increases in production of proline (Zhang et al. 2008). In cucumber seedlings, NO can reduce damage caused by salinity by regulating proline metabolism through increasing activity of P5CS and decreasing activity of PDH (Fan et al. 2012).

ROLE OF PROLINE IN FLOWERING AND DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESSES↑

Several studies have reported that proline is associated with flowering and other developmental processes (Samach et al. 2000; Trovato et al. 2001; Mattioli et al. 2008; Szekely et al. 2008; Lehmann et al. 2010). By acting as a metabolite, proline can become a potential signalling molecule and has a prominent role in the flowering of plants (Mattioli et al. 2009). The genes required for production of proline metabolizing enzymes have been detected during seed development in several plant species, viz. Oryza sativa, Solanum lycopersicum, Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis (Verbruggen et al. 1993; Fujita et al. 1998; Armengaud et al. 2004; Hur et al. 2004). The functions of proline in the propagative parts of plants have been described (Schwacke et al. 1999; Mattioli et al. 2012). Different tomato organs that amass proline have been analysed, and levels were found to be 60-fold higher in flowers than in other organs (Schwacke et al. 1999). In A. thaliana, proline is essential for development of pollen and for fertilization (Mattioli et al. 2012). Apical meristems with a low proline content signal that conditions are met for flowering, whereas higher proline levels indicate a stress signal for the plant (Mattioli et al. 2008, 2009). Constitutive overexpression of P5CS1 has been reported to cause early flowering under favourable condition in transgenic plants (Mattioli et al. 2008) and under salt stress situations (Kishor et al. 1995).

Use of proline by plant cells during development encompassing rapid cell growth could signal a potential energy supply (Mattioli et al. 2009). Proline protects developing cells from damage by osmotic stress during pollen development and embryogenesis (Trovato et al. 2008; Mattioli et al. 2009).

Several genetic engineering studies have confirmed that biosynthetic and metabolic genes accumulate proline, and this has opened avenues for systematic research into the role of proline in stress responses (Huang et al. 2000; Groppa & Benavides, 2008; Giri, 2011; Suprasanna et al. 2014). Progress in molecular and cellular biology has allowed essential proline biosynthetic genes to be cloned and transferred to crop plants (Wang et al. 2003). Transgenic plants show enhanced seedling growth and contain more ribulose1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase and phosphoenolpyruvate compared to the wild type (Yan et al. 2011). For example, overproduction of proline-producing genes improved drought stress tolerance in tobacco (Kishor et al. 1995). Table 2 provides an overview of transgenic plants designed to increase proline-synthesizing or metabolic genes that improve tolerance to abiotic stresses.

Table 2. Overexpression of proline biosynthetic genes in transgenic plants increases stress tolerance.
Transgenic plant Gene and plant source Gene product Protective effect Reference
Arabidopsis P5CS1 from A. thaliana P5CS Mattioli et al. 2008
P5CR from A. thaliana P5CR Simon-Sarkadi et al. 2006a
Nicotiana tabacum P5CS from Vigna aconitifolia P5CS Kishor et al. 1995
Glycine max P5CR from A. thaliana P5CR Simon-Sarkadi et al. 2006a
Triticum aestivum P5CS from V. aconitifolia P5CS Vendruscolo et al. 2007
Oryza sativa P5CS from O. sativa P5CS Yamada et al. 2005
Petunia hybrida cv. Mitchell P5CS from A. thaliana P5CS Yamada et al. 2005
Saccharum spp. P5CS from V. aconitifolia P5CS Molinari et al. 2007
Panicum virgatum P5CS1 and P5CS2 P5CS Guan et al. 2020
  • P5CS = pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase, P5CR = pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase.
  • a Drought tolerance.
  • b Salt and heat tolerance.
  • c Salt tolerance.

Using 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase genes (OsP5CS gene from O. sativa or AtP5CS gene from A. thaliana), transgenic lines of Petunia hybrida have been developed with higher proline content that display drought stress tolerance (Yamada et al. 2005). Enhanced tolerance to drought stress has been shown in transgenic (VaP5CS from Vigna aconitifolia) wheat plants (Vendruscolo et al. 2007). Under different stress conditions, viz. salt, PEG, ABA and heat stress, P5CR has been overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of proline P5CR increased proline accumulation in soybean (Glycine max cv. Ibis) leading to enhanced tolerance to drought (Simon-Sarkadi et al. 2006a). Guan et al. (2020) revealed that overexpressing PvP5CS1 and PvP5CS2 improved salt tolerance in switchgrass. Therefore, addition of proline biosynthesis genes will provide an efficient method to improve crop tolerance to numerous abiotic stress conditions.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

This review has highlighted numerous positive influences of proline on plants and the capacity of proline to induce abiotic stress tolerance. By scavenging ROS, maintaining cell turgor, protecting cell structures and maintaining ion homeostasis, proline can enhance plant growth and physiological responses (Fig. 1). This integrated network might influences flowering and development processes that could lead to plant adaptation to abiotic stresses. Proline modulation of abiotic stress has revealed a new path for genetic manipulation of crop species to ensure long-term agricultural sustainability. In the last decade, this has also revealed a strategy targeted at improvement of plant performance through engineering proline biosynthetic multiple-gene functions in a holistic approach. In today’s breeding projects, cutting-edge as well as common genetic engineering tools have been successfully applied. Multigene stacking tools, such as the Golden Gate modular cloning system, have been established to modify several genes at the same time. Multiple-gene transformation is possible using a variety of approaches that allow large DNA fragments to be introduced. Plastid transformation is another promising and reliable method. As a cutting-edge breeding tool, CRISPR/Cas9 has delivered a revolution in gene engineering. The CRISPR/Cas9 system could be readily employed to effectively introduce mutations both in regulatory elements and coding sequences. These tremendous technological advances will enable us to modify genes that induce proline to enhance crop productivity under adverse environmental conditions. Finally, a complete understanding of plant adaptive/regulatory mechanisms related to growth performance in response to multiple abiotic stresses factors is crucial to develop modern varieties which could have better adaptability to changing field conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of Bangladesh, for financial support regarding this study.

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.