Volume 29, Issue 5 e70139
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

En-Bloc Versus Bilateral Sequential Technique for Pediatric Lung Transplantation

Mohan M. John

Corresponding Author

Mohan M. John

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence:

Mohan M. John ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Pranay Nayi

Pranay Nayi

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joshua Rosenblum

Joshua Rosenblum

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Subhadra Shashidharan

Subhadra Shashidharan

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Chai

Paul Chai

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fawwaz Shaw

Fawwaz Shaw

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 July 2025

Meeting presentation: Poster presentation at the American Association of Thoracic Surgery Annual Meeting 2024, Toronto, ON.

ABSTRACT

Background

Lung transplantation is the primary surgical therapy for end-stage lung disease in children. Bilateral sequential lung transplantation (BSLT) is the most widely used technique across the United States. En-bloc lung transplantation (EBLT) was put forward as an alternative to avoid the complications associated with bronchial anastomoses in smaller children. There are no multi-institutional reports comparing the outcomes of these two techniques.

Methods

The United Network for Organ Sharing dataset was queried for patients <= 18 years who underwent bilateral lung transplantation from 2002 to 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical technique: EBLT and BSLT. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared, along with follow-up survival data. The primary outcome of interest was freedom from death or re-transplantation. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients aged <=5 years.

Results

919 children received lung transplants during the study period. The EBLT technique was utilized in 80 (8.7%) transplants. EBLT patients were younger (9.5 vs. 15 years, p = 0.0001) and more likely to be on mechanical ventilation (33.8 vs. 17.3%, p = 0.0003). EBLT had a lower proportion of cystic fibrosis (37.5 vs. 55.5%, p < 0.0001) as the primary diagnosis. There was no difference in freedom from death or re-transplantation (p = 0.81) or early rejection (17.5 vs. 27.1%, p = 0.17) between the two groups. EBLT patients had less airway dehiscence (0.0 vs. 1.2%, p = 0.006) and less bronchiolitis obliterans (36.3 vs. 65.0%, p = 0.001) during the period of follow-up. On multivariable analysis, surgical technique was not an independent risk factor for survival (HR 0.99 [CI 0.68–1.38], p = 0.92). For patients aged ≤ 5 years, there was no difference in survival between EBLT and BSLT (p = 0.97).

Conclusions

EBLT is associated with less airway dehiscence and bronchiolitis obliterans than BSLT in children. There is no difference in freedom from death or re-transplantation between the groups.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the UNOS dataset—STAR files at https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/request-data/.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.