Volume 27, Issue 6 e14570
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to pediatric lung transplantation: Modern era analysis

Wonshill Koh

Corresponding Author

Wonshill Koh

Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Correspondence

Wonshill Koh, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2003, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Huaiyu Zang

Huaiyu Zang

Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas J. Ollberding

Nicholas J. Ollberding

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Assem Ziady

Assem Ziady

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Division of Bone Marrow Transplant, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Don Hayes Jr

Don Hayes Jr

Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 July 2023
Citations: 8

Abstract

Background

Survival outcomes of children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at time of lung transplant (LTx) remain unclear.

Methods

Pediatric first-time LTx recipients transplanted between January 2000 and December 2020 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry to compare post-transplant survival according to ECMO support at time of transplant. For a comprehensive analysis of the data, univariate analysis, multivariable Cox regression, and propensity score matching were performed.

Results

During the study period, 954 children under 18 years of age underwent LTx with 40 patients on ECMO. We did not identify a post-LTx survival difference between patients receiving ECMO when compared to those that did not. A multivariable Cox regression model (Hazard ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 1.45; p = .51) did not demonstrate an increased risk for death post-LTx. Lastly, a propensity score matching analysis, retaining 33 ECMO and 33 non-ECMO patients, further confirmed no post-LTx survival difference comparing ECMO to no ECMO cohorts (Hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.48, 2.00; p = .96).

Conclusions

In this contemporary cohort of children, the use of ECMO at the time of LTx did not negatively impact post-transplant survival.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors report no conflicts of interest and have no relevant disclosures regarding this manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.