Volume 23, Issue 6 e13499
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Inadequate blood pressure control demonstrated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Kanchana Tangnararatchakit

Corresponding Author

Kanchana Tangnararatchakit

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Correspondence

Kanchana Tangnararatchakit, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Uthaiwan Kongkhanin

Uthaiwan Kongkhanin

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Poomiporn Katanyuwong

Poomiporn Katanyuwong

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Pawaree Saisawat

Pawaree Saisawat

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Songkiat Chantarogh

Songkiat Chantarogh

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Kwanchai Pirojsakul

Kwanchai Pirojsakul

Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 June 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

Background

Adequate BP control in RT recipients should not rely only by normal office BP but also on normal 24-hour BP. This study aims to assess adequacy of BP control by ABPM and to assess ABPM parameters associated with LVMI in pediatric RT recipients.

Materials and methods

Patients aged 5-20 years who have been followed after RT were enrolled. Demographic data and BP assessed by office and ABPM were collected. Echocardiography was performed to detect LVMI.

Results

Thirty RT recipients (18 males) with median age of 15 years (IQR 13-18.5) were included. Among 23 patients who were taking antihypertensive drugs, uncontrolled hypertension was detected in 34.8% and 78.3% by office BP measurement and ABPM, respectively. Thus, the difference in prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension observed by ABPM versus office BP was 43.5%. Those seven patients who were not taking antihypertensive drugs because of normal office BP, four patients (57.1%) had masked hypertension and one patient had elevated BP. Fifteen patients have progression of LVH after RT. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.369, 95%CI 0.985-1.904, P-value = 0.062) had a trend to be associated with progression of LVH. Moreover, nighttime systolic BP z-score was significantly correlated with LVMI (r = 0.551, P-value = 0.002).

Conclusion

The difference in prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension uncovered by ABPM was 43.5%. Nighttime SBP z-score was significantly correlated with LVMI.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.