Volume 23, Issue 5 e13451
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI) as a potential predictive biomarker of graft-versus-host disease in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Micah A. Skeens

Corresponding Author

Micah A. Skeens

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio

Correspondence

Micah A. Skeens, Nationwide Children’s Hospital 700 Children’s Drive Columbus, OH 43205.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Mary S. Dietrich

Mary S. Dietrich

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (Biostatistics, Ingram Cancer Center, Psychiatry), Nashville, Tennessee

Search for more papers by this author
Nancy Ryan-Wenger

Nancy Ryan-Wenger

The Ohio State University School of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Mary Jo Gilmer

Mary Jo Gilmer

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

Search for more papers by this author
Shelagh A. Mulvaney

Shelagh A. Mulvaney

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Search for more papers by this author
Terrah Foster Akard

Terrah Foster Akard

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 May 2019
Citations: 7

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential predictive value of the Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI) biomarker with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patient during the acute phase post-transplant. This retrospective descriptive study evaluated a total of 406 tacrolimus levels in 64 patients over a varying number of weeks per participant (median = 8, min = 3, max = 11). Patients were followed until Day 100 post-transplant or tacrolimus taper began. A total of 72 episodes of non-therapeutic levels occurred during the acute phase. Of those, 40 (56%) were <5, while 32 (44%) were >15. Approximately 39% (n = 25 of 64) of the participants in the study developed GVHD post-discharge. Those with GVHD had a statistically significantly higher MLVI than those that did not (median = 3.1, IQR = 2.5-4.7 vs 2.3, IQR = 1.6-3.4, respectively, P = 0.024). Using a criterion of MLVI > 3, there was a statistically significant increased likelihood of GVHD (OR = 3.82, 95% CI=1.32 = 11.04, P = 0.013). Area under the curve (AUC) calculation for the sensitivity and specificity of using the MLVI for GVHD was also conducted. The AUC of 0.67 was statistically significant (95% CI 0.53-0.81, = 0.024). This is the first-known study to report the use of the MLVI in HSCT patients. The MLVI is associated with a main adverse outcome related to HSCT, GVHD. These results are encouraging of a new potential biomarker to evaluate tacrolimus serum assay levels and identify patients at risk for developing GVHD.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.