Volume 22, Issue 8 e13305
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improved contemporary outcomes of liver transplantation for pediatric hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

Brian Ezekian

Corresponding Author

Brian Ezekian

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence

Brian Ezekian, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Michael S. Mulvihill

Michael S. Mulvihill

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Paul M. Schroder

Paul M. Schroder

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Brian F. Gilmore

Brian F. Gilmore

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Harold J. Leraas

Harold J. Leraas

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Brian C. Gulack

Brian C. Gulack

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Jane Commander

Sarah Jane Commander

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Alisha M. Mavis

Alisha M. Mavis

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Susan G. Kreissman

Susan G. Kreissman

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Stuart J. Knechtle

Stuart J. Knechtle

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Elisabeth T. Tracy

Elisabeth T. Tracy

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew S. Barbas

Andrew S. Barbas

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2018
Citations: 25

Abstract

Purpose

Improvement in outcomes of LT for pediatric HB and HCC has been reported in small series. We analyzed national outcomes and changes in donor, recipient, and perioperative factors over time that may contribute to survival differences.

Methods

The UNOS database was queried for patients age <21 years that underwent LT for a primary diagnosis of HB or HCC (1987-2017). Subjects were divided into historic (transplant before 2010) and contemporary (transplant after 2010) cohorts. Baseline characteristics were compiled and examined. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

Results

In total, 599 children with HB received LT (320 historic vs 279 contemporary). Concurrently, 141 children with HCC received LT (92 historic vs 49 contemporary). For both tumors, waitlist time decreased (HB 56.2 days historic vs 33.2 days contemporary, P = 0.017; HCC 189.3 days historic vs 71.7 days contemporary, P = 0.012). In the historic cohorts, patients with HB had a 1-year and 5-year OS of 84.6% and 75.1%, respectively. Survival for HCC was 84.4% and 59.9%, respectively. Outcomes improved in the contemporary era to 89.1% and 82.6% for HB, and 94.7% and 80.8% for HCC, respectively (both log-rank test P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Outcomes of LT have improved significantly, with contemporary survival now equivalent between these tumors and exceeding 80% 5-year OS. Future studies are needed to explore whether offering LT in patients that are resectable is justifiable.

DISCLOSURES

Data were presented as a plenary presentation at the American Pediatric Surgical Association on May 4, 2018. The data used in this study are derived from a de-identified UNOS file. The OPTN have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology employed, or the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigators.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.