Impact of post-transplant minimal residual disease on the clinical outcome of pediatric acute leukemia
Corresponding Author
Katsutsugu Umeda
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Correspondence
Katsutsugu Umeda, Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi Iwai
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKoji Kawaguchi
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasamitsu Mikami
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSeishiro Nodomi
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSatoshi Saida
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHidefumi Hiramatsu
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorToshio Heike
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKatsuyuki Ohmori
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSouichi Adachi
Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Katsutsugu Umeda
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Correspondence
Katsutsugu Umeda, Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi Iwai
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKoji Kawaguchi
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasamitsu Mikami
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSeishiro Nodomi
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSatoshi Saida
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHidefumi Hiramatsu
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorToshio Heike
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKatsuyuki Ohmori
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSouichi Adachi
Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This retrospective study examined the clinical significance of FCM-MRD in 36 patients with ALL and 29 patients with AML after their first allogeneic HSCT. Hematological (FCM-MRD ≥5.0%) and molecular relapse (FCM-MRD <5.0%) were first detected in 10 and two patients with ALL and in seven and eight patients with AML, respectively. Eight of 10 patients with molecular relapse eventually progressed to hematological relapse, although most were treated with immunological intervention by aggressive discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy or donor lymphocyte infusion. Among these 12 patients, four of seven patients that obtained MRDneg CR following post-transplant chemotherapy remain alive and disease-free after their second HSCT; however, all five patients who underwent a second HSCT in non-CR died of disease or treatment-related complications. As the FCM-MRD monitoring system used in the current study was probably not sensitive enough to detect MRD, which could be elucidated by immunological intervention, more sensitive diagnostic tools are mandatory for post-transplant MRD monitoring. Additional studies are required to address the impact of presecond transplant MRD on the clinical outcome of second HSCT.
References
- 1Balduzzi A, Valsecchi MG, Uderzo C, et al. Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study. Lancet. 2005; 366: 635-642.
- 2Leung W, Campana D, Yang J, et al. High success rate of hematopoietic cell transplantation regardless of donor source in children with very high-risk leukemia. Blood. 2011; 118: 223-230.
- 3Ko RH, Ji L, Barnette P, et al. Outcome of patients treated for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 648-654.
- 4Peters C, Schrappe M, von Stackelberg A, et al. Stem-cell transplantation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective international multicenter trial comparing sibling donors with matched unrelated donors – the ALL-SCT-BFM-2003 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 1265-1274.
- 5Tsukimoto I, Tawa A, Horibe J, et al. Risk-stratified therapy and the intensive use of cytarabine improves the outcome in children acute myeloid leukemia: the AML99 trial from the Japanese Childhood AML Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4007-4013.
- 6Creutig U, Zimmermann M, Lehrnbecher T, et al. Less toxicity by optimizing chemotherapy, but not by addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: results of AML-BFM 98. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 24: 4499-4506.
- 7Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Dahl G, et al. Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 543-552.
- 8Beier P, Albert MH, Bader P, et al. Allo-SCT using BU, CY, and melphalan for children with AML in second CR. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 651-656.
- 9Dworzak MN, Fröschl G, Printz D, et al. Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002; 99: 1952-1958.
- 10Coustan-Smith E, Song G, Clark C, et al. New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011; 117: 6267-6276.
- 11Baer MR, Stewart CC, Dodge RK, et al. High frequency of immunophenotype changes in acute myeloid leukemia at relapse: implications for residual disease detection (Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8361). Blood. 2001; 97: 3574-3580.
- 12Langebrake C, Creutzig U, Dworzak M, et al. Residual disease monitoring in childhood acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: the MRD-AML-BFM Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 3686-3692.
- 13Conter V, Bartram CR, Valsecchi MG, et al. Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results in 3184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study. Blood. 2010; 115: 3206-3214.
- 14Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Henze GH, et al. Prognostic value of minimal residual disease quantification before allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the ALL-REZ BM Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 377-384.
- 15Bulduzzi A, di Maio L, Silverstri D, et al. Minimal residual disease before and after transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: is there any room for intervention? Br J Haematol. 2013; 164: 396-408.
- 16Leung W, Pui CH, Coustan-Smith E, et al. Detectable minimal residual disease before hematopoietic cell transplantation is prognostic but does not preclude cure for children with very-high-risk leukemia. Blood. 2012; 120: 468-472.
- 17Pochon C, Oger E, Michel G, et al. Follow-up of post-transplant minimal residual disease and chimerism in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: 90 d to react. Br J Haematol. 2015; 169: 249-261.
- 18Pulsipher MA, Langholz B, Schultz KR, et al. Risk factors and timing of relapse after allogeneic transplantation in pediatric ALL: for whom and when should interventions be tested? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015; 50: 1173-1179.
- 19Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, et al. Increasing mixed chimerism is an important prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: possible role for pre-emptive immunotherapy? J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1696-1705.
- 20Bader P, Kreyenberg H, von Stackelberg A, et al. Monitoring of minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia allows for the identification of impending relapse: results of the ALL-BFM-SCT 2003 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 1275-1284.
- 21Umeda K, Saida S, Kato I, et al. Impact of minimal residual disease before transplantation on clinical outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. J Jpn Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015; 52: 20-25.
- 22Umeda K, Hiramatsu H, Kawaguchi K, et al. Impact of pre-transplant minimal residual disease on the post-transplant outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Transplant. 2016; 20: 692-696.
- 23Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009; 15: 1628-1633.
- 24Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 15: 825-828.
- 25Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980; 69: 204-217.
- 26Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988; 16: 1141-1154.
- 27Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 452-458.
- 28Virchis A, Koh M, Rankin P, et al. Fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with or without idarubicin in the treatment of high risk acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2004; 124: 26-32.
- 29Yoshida N, Sakaguchi H, Matsumoto K, et al. Successful treatment with low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation for children with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Br J Haematol. 2012; 158: 666-668.
- 30Schultz KR, Bowman WP, Aledo A, et al. Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic acute leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5175-5181.
- 31Hijiya N, Thomson B, Isakoff MS, et al. Phase 2 trial of clofarabine in combination with etoposide and cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011; 118: 6043-6049.
- 32Kolb J. Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes. Blood. 2008; 112: 4371-4383.
- 33Pulsipher MA, Carlson C, Langholz B, et al. IgH-V(D)J NGS-MRD measurement pre- and early post-allotransplant defines very low- and very high-risk ALL patients. Blood. 2015; 125: 3501-3508.
- 34van Dongen JJ, van der Velden VH, Brüggemann M, et al. Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies. Blood. 2015; 125: 3996-4009.
- 35Lee DW, Kochendefer JN, Stetler-Stervenson M, et al. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2015; 385: 517-528.