Volume 31, Issue 8 pp. 834-838
SPECIAL INTEREST ARTICLE

A practical and ethical toolkit for last-minute refusal of anesthetic in children

John Massie

Corresponding Author

John Massie

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

John Massie, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Children’s Bioethics Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital, 50 Flemington Road., Parkville 3052, Vic., Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Skinner

Adam Skinner

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ian McKenzie

Ian McKenzie

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Lynn Gillam

Lynn Gillam

Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 May 2021
Citations: 7

Abstract

Children's fear of a procedure, including the anesthetic, is a common issue that operating theatre staff face. This fear is generally mitigated by preesthetic preparation and information sharing. Last-minute refusal of a procedure creates unique difficulties for the anesthetist and proceduralist. Refusal for a procedure raises issues of whether the dissent is binding, and if not, how best to get the child to theatre without creating moral injury. In this case review of a young adolescent who refuses to go to the operating theatre, we explore practical and ethical options to resolve the situation. We discuss respect for persons (including assent and consent), best interests, truth-telling, harm minimization, and restraint. The importance of a postevent debrief is discussed. We also assess the value of a clinical ethics service with team members embedded in clinical teams.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.