Volume 53, Issue 4 pp. 579-584
CONCEPT ANALYSIS

Exploring, defining, and illustrating a concept: Structural and psychological empowerment in the workplace

Sarah E. Abel

Corresponding Author

Sarah E. Abel

University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, Indiana

Correspondence Sarah E. Abel, University of Southern Indiana, 31 Mulberry Ct. Brownsburg, IN 46112. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Mikel W. Hand

Mikel W. Hand

University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 October 2018
Citations: 16

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this concept analysis is to clarify the meaning and relationship of psychological and structural empowerment.

Background

Empowerment is linked to positive organizational and individual constructs and outcomes. Improving the work environment may assist in sustaining a fragile and essential workforce.

Design

Walker and Avant’s method was used to guide an analysis of this concept.

Data Source

Resources published from 1970 to 2018 were identified via electronic databases, empirical works, and modern operational usage of the terms.

Review Methods

A literature review and search for concept maps were completed and analyzed to identify uses and definitions of the concept: attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents. It also includes identifying model, borderline, and contrary cases to differentiate empowerment from other related concepts.

Results

A comprehensive, inclusive review of empowerment must include both constructs, structural and psychological. A conceptual map of these akin constructs illustrates their syndication.

Conclusions

The concept of examining empowerment from both constructs, structural and psychological, is necessary to develop evidence-based practice strategies and improve the work environment and workforce.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.