Volume 29, Issue 12 pp. 873-883
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Structures for quality assurance and measurements for kidney replacement therapies: A multinational study from the ISN-GKHA

Udeme E. Ekrikpo

Corresponding Author

Udeme E. Ekrikpo

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria

Correspondence

Udeme E. Ekrikpo, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Bianca Davidson

Bianca Davidson

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Viviane Calice-Silva

Viviane Calice-Silva

Pro-Rim Foundation, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Region of Joinville (UNIVILLE), Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Sabine Karam

Sabine Karam

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
Mohamed A. Osman

Mohamed A. Osman

Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Silvia Arruebo

Silvia Arruebo

The International Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Fergus J. Caskey

Fergus J. Caskey

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sandrine Damster

Sandrine Damster

The International Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Jo-Ann Donner

Jo-Ann Donner

The International Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Vivekanand Jha

Vivekanand Jha

George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India

School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK

Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

Search for more papers by this author
Adeera Levin

Adeera Levin

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Masaomi Nangaku

Masaomi Nangaku

Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Syed Saad

Syed Saad

Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Marcello Tonelli

Marcello Tonelli

Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Canada and Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization Collaborating Centre in Prevention and Control of Chronic Kidney Disease, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Feng Ye

Feng Ye

Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Ikechi G. Okpechi

Ikechi G. Okpechi

Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Kidney and Hypertension Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Aminu K. Bello

Aminu K. Bello

Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
David W. Johnson

David W. Johnson

Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 October 2024

Aminu K. Bello and David W. Johnson are co-chairs for the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) and co-senior authors.

Abstract

Aim

Optimal care for patients with kidney failure reduces the risks of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular events and death. We evaluated data from the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to assess the capacity for quality service delivery for kidney failure care across countries and regions.

Method

We explored the quality of kidney failure care delivery and the monitoring of quality indicators from data provided by an international survey of stakeholders from countries affiliated with the ISN from July to September 2022.

Results

One hundred and sixty seven countries participated in the survey, representing about 97.4% of the world's population. In countries where haemodialysis (HD) was available, 81% (n = 134) provided standard HD sessions (three times weekly for 3–4 h per session) to patients. Among countries with peritoneal dialysis (PD) services, 61% (n = 101) were able to provide standard PD care (3–4 exchanges per day). In high-income countries, 98% (n = 62) reported that >75% of centers regularly monitored dialysis water quality for bacteria compared to 28% (n = 5) of low-income countries (LICs). Capacity to monitor the administration of immunosuppression drugs was generally available in 21% (n = 4) of LICs, compared to 90% (n = 57) of high-income countries. There was significant variability between and within regions and country income groups in reporting the quality of services utilized for kidney replacement therapies.

Conclusion

Quality assurance standards on diagnostic and treatment tools were variable and particularly infrequent in LICs. Standardization of delivered care is essential for improving outcomes for people with kidney failure.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.