Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration: Creating a New Theoretical Framework for Understanding Involuntary Property Loss and the Remedies Required
Bernadette Atuahene
Bernadette Atuahene: is a Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology. She may be contacted at [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorBernadette Atuahene
Bernadette Atuahene: is a Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology. She may be contacted at [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program, I introduced the concept of “dignity takings,” which I defined as property confiscation that involves the dehumanization or infantilization of the dispossessed. I argued that the appropriate remedy for a dignity taking is “dignity restoration”: material compensation to dispossessed populations through processes that affirm their humanity and reinforce their agency. For this symposium, contributors were invited to examine these paired concepts through case studies beyond the South African context. This introductory essay summarizes the central arguments of We Want What's Ours and considers how the symposium contributions confirm, extend, or revise the concepts of dignity takings and dignity restoration.
References
- Acevedo, John F. 2016. “Restoring Community Dignity Following Policy Misconduct.” Howard Law Journal 59: 621–49.
- Acevedo, John F. In press. “Dignity Takings in the Criminal Law of Seventeenth-Century England and the Massachusetts Bay Colony.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Albert, Craig Douglas. In press. “No Place to Call Home: The Iraqi Kurds Under Arabization, Saddam Hussein, and ISIS.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Atuahene, Bernadette. 2011. “Paying for the Past: Addressing Past Property Violations in South Africa.” Law & Society Review 45: 955–89.
- Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014a. We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014b. “The Importance of Conversation in Transitional Justice: A Study of Land Restitution in South Africa.” Law & Social Inquiry 39 (4): 902–37.
-
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2016. “Takings as a Sociolegal Concept: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Involuntary Property Loss.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 171–97.
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084457 Google Scholar
- Bachar, Gilat. In press. “Access Denied—Using Procedure to Restrict Tort Litigation: Lessons from the Israeli-Palestinian Experience.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Blume, Lawrence, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1984. “Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis.” California Law Review 72 (4): 569–628.
- Braithwaite, John. 1999. “Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts.” Crime and Justice 25 (1): 1–127.
-
Brophy, Alfred L. 2016. “When More than Property Is Lost: The Dignitary Losses and Gains in the Tulsa Riot of 1921.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 824–32.
10.1111/lsi.12205 Google Scholar
- Dana, David, and W. Thomas Merrill. 2002. Takings. New York: Foundation Press.
- Engel, Stephen, and Timothy Lyle. In press. “Fucking with Dignity: Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and how the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Epstein, Richard Allen. 1985. Takings Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Fischel, William. 1995. Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Fullilove, Mindy Thompson. 2004. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York: One World/Ballantine Books.
- Guzmán-Rodríguez, Diana. In press. “Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration: A Case Study of the Colombian Land Restitution Program.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
-
Hartog, Hendrik. 2016. “Coverture and Dignity: A Comment.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 833–40.
10.1111/lsi.12200 Google Scholar
- Henderson, Taja-Nia. In press. “Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration Examined Through the Lens of American Chattel Slavery.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
-
Hulsebosch, Daniel J. 2016. “Exile, Choice, and Loyalism: Taking and Restoring Dignity in the American Revolution.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 841–65.
10.1111/lsi.12215 Google Scholar
- Joo, Thomas. In press. “Alien, Land, Law: Urban Renewal and Sacramento's Lost Japantown.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Kahrl, Andrew. In press. “Unconscionable: Tax Delinquency Sales as a Form of Dignity Taking.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Kaiser, Joshua. In press. “Making the Underclass: Deprivation, Degradation, and America's Hidden Penal Regime.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1998. The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kedar, Alexandre. 2016. “Dignity Takings and Dispossession in Israel.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 866–87.
10.1111/lsi.12208 Google Scholar
- Kelly, Daniel B. 2006. “The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based on Secret Purchases and Private Influence.” Cornell Law Review 92 (1): 1–65.
-
Leckie, Scott. 2000. “Housing and Property Issues for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons in the Context of Return: Key Considerations for UNHCR Policy and Practice.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 19 (3): 5–63.
10.1093/rsq/19.3.5 Google Scholar
- Locke, John. [1690] 1980. Two Treatise of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Michelman, Frank I. 1967. “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Harvard Law Review 80: 1165–1258.
- Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Nadas, Rachel, and Jayesh Rathod. In press. “Damaged Bodies, Damaged Lives: Immigrant Worker Injuries as Dignity Takings.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ossei-Owusu, Shaun. In press. “The Good State Giveth and Taketh Away: Race, Class, and Urban Hospital Closings.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Phillips, Victoria F. In press. “Beyond Trademark: The Washington Redskins Case and the Search for Dignity.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Pils, Eva. 2016. “Resisting Dignity Takings in China.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 888–916.
-
Richland, Justin B. 2016. “Dignity as (Self-)Determination: Hopi Sovereignty in the Face of US Dispossessions.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 917–38.
10.1111/lsi.12191 Google Scholar
- Rosado Marzán, Cesar. In press. “Dignity Takings and ‘Wage Theft.’” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- Rose, Carol M. 2000. “Property and Expropriation: Themes and Variations in American Law.” Utah Law Review 1.
-
Rose, Carol M. 2016. “Racially Restrictive Covenants—Were They Dignity Takings?.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 939–55.
10.1111/lsi.12192 Google Scholar
- Serkin, Christopher. 2005. “The Meaning of Value: Assessing Just Compensation for Regulatory Takings.” Northwestern University Law Review 99: 677–742.
- Shaw, Matthew Patrick. In press. “Creating the Urban Educational Desert Through School Closures and Dignity Taking.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92 (3).
- United Nations. 1996. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. UN Document A/51/18.
- Van der Walt, Andre J. 1998. The Constitutional Property Clause. Cape Town: Juta; Kluwer Law International.
- Van der Westhuizen, Christi. 2007. White Power & the Rise and Fall of the National Party. Cape Town: Zebra Press.
-
Veraart, Wouter. 2016. “Two Rounds of Postwar Restitution and Dignity Restoration in the Netherlands and France.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 956–72.
10.1111/lsi.12212 Google Scholar
- Woolford, Andrew, and Stefan Wolejszo. 2006. “Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos.” Law & Society Review 40 (4): 871–902.
Cases Cited
- Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823).
- Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
- Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).
Statutes Cited
- Land Restitution Act, South Africa (1994).
- South African Constitution (1996).