Volume 37, Issue 3 pp. 345-353
VIRAL HEPATITIS

The cost impact of outreach testing and treatment for hepatitis C in an urban Drug Treatment Unit

Nowlan Selvapatt

Corresponding Author

Nowlan Selvapatt

Department of Hepatology, Imperial College, London, UK

Liver and Antiviral Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence

Dr Nowlan Selvapatt, Liver and Antiviral Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Ward

Thomas Ward

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Lorna Harrison

Lorna Harrison

Liver and Antiviral Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jody Lombardini

Jody Lombardini

Addictions Directorate, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Thursz

Mark Thursz

Department of Hepatology, Imperial College, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Phil McEwan

Phil McEwan

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK

School of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Ashley Brown

Ashley Brown

Liver and Antiviral Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 August 2016
Citations: 16
Handling Editor: Jürgen Rockstroh

Abstract

Background & Aims

In developed countries persons who inject drugs (PWID) represents a significant risk for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). It is reported that up to half of persons with chronic HCV remain undiagnosed and reliance on attendance to specialist clinics remain a barrier to treatment. This study assesses the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of outreach screening and treatment within a Drug Treatment Unit (DTU).

Methods

All persons attending a London DTU were offered HCV testing, and where appropriate follow-up and treatment by a specialist nurse at the DTU. Three years of data informed a cost-effective-analysis using a validated Markov model. A hypothetical scenario in which only direct acting antiviral (DAA) treatments were used was also assessed.

Results

Of 321 persons eligible, 216 were screened, 89 were HCV positive and 66 had confirmatory evidence of viraemia. All were infected with either HCV genotype 1 or 3. Treatment was initiated in 29 persons, 22 with interferon based and 7 DAA only regimens. Following initial treatment 21 (72%) achieved SVR12. It is estimated that this programme represents an average per-patient cost-saving of £2498 and a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 4.10 over a lifetime. In a hypothetical scenario of all oral DAA treatment, an incremental cost per QALY of £1029 was estimated.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates feasibility and cost effectiveness of outreach testing and treatment of hepatitis C within comparable DTU settings. Additional costs of newer DAA therapies would not be prohibitive when considering willingness-to-pay thresholds commonly used by policy makers.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.