Volume 61, Issue 2 pp. 544-552
Research Note

Conservative Protestantism, Sexual Insecurity, and Masculine Discrepancy Stress

Terrence D. Hill

Corresponding Author

Terrence D. Hill

Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio

Replication Statement: The data for this investigation are not publicly available because the data were only recently collected. Raw output and supplemental analyses are available upon request from the lead author.

Correspondence should be addressed to Terrence Hill, Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-1644, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
John P. Bartkowski

John P. Bartkowski

Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Pfaffendorf

Jessica Pfaffendorf

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University

Search for more papers by this author
Lacey J. Ritter

Lacey J. Ritter

Department of Sociology, Mount Mercy University

Search for more papers by this author
Amy M. Burdette

Amy M. Burdette

Department of Sociology and Public Health Program, Florida State University

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher G. Ellison

Christopher G. Ellison

Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 January 2022

Abstract

Are conservative Protestant men especially insecure about their sexual prowess and masculinity? A recent state-level analysis by Perry and Whitehead suggests that they are. In this study, we use national data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey to formally test whether conservative Protestant men are more concerned with their sexual abilities and masculinity than other men. Bivariate and multivariate binary logistic and ordinary least squares regression models consistently show that conservative Protestant men tend to exhibit similar levels of sexual insecurity (self-reported performance anxiety, erectile dysfunction, and ED medication use) and masculine discrepancy stress (perceived failure to conform to normative expectations associated with hegemonic masculinity) as men of other religious faiths (moderate Protestants, Catholics, and other Christians/religions) and men who report no religious affiliation. Our analyses are noteworthy because they call into question the theory of evangelicalism and phallocentric masculine insecurity at the individual level.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.