Volume 49, Issue 10 pp. 874-875
Editor's Commentary
Free Access

Conflict of interest: Editor's commentary

David Isaacs

David Isaacs

Editor-in-Chief

Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Alison Kent

Alison Kent

Editor of Neonatal Issue of Sept 2012, Consultant Neonatologist

Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 October 2013

There is nothing wrong with having one or more Conflicts of Interest; it is wrong not to declare potential Conflicts of Interest.1 However, stating a Conflict of Interest does not exonerate an author from trying to avoid bias in writing a review article. There is evidence that financial Conflicts of Interest are common and not always declared by authors writing about drugs.2 Ultimately, however, it is the responsibility of the editor to decide whether or not an article by an author who has declared a potential Conflict of Interest should or should not be published. In the case of the article by Professor Tudehope et al.,3 we decided that the article merited publication and the authors' position on preterm formulas was not unduly influenced by the stated conflict. We welcome further debate on the important topic of how to deal with potential Conflicts of Interest.