Original Article
The World at 7:00: Comparing the Experience of Situations Across 20 Countries
Esther Guillaume, Erica Baranski, Elysia Todd, Brock Bastian, Igor Bronin, Christina Ivanova, Joey T. Cheng, François S. de Kock, Jaap J. A. Denissen, David Gallardo-Pujol, Peter Halama, Gyuseog Q. Han, Jaechang Bae, Jungsoon Moon, Ryan Y. Hong, Martina Hřebíčková, Sylvie Graf, Paweł Izdebski, Lars Lundmann, Lars Penke, Marco Perugini, Giulio Costantini, John Rauthmann, Matthias Ziegler, Anu Realo, Liisalotte Elme, Tatsuya Sato, Shizuka Kawamoto, Piotr Szarota,
Jessica L. Tracy, Marcel A. G. van Aken, Yu Yang, David C. Funder,
Piotr Szarota
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
David C. Funder
University of California, Riverside
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David Funder, Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA. Email: [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorEsther Guillaume, Erica Baranski, Elysia Todd, Brock Bastian, Igor Bronin, Christina Ivanova, Joey T. Cheng, François S. de Kock, Jaap J. A. Denissen, David Gallardo-Pujol, Peter Halama, Gyuseog Q. Han, Jaechang Bae, Jungsoon Moon, Ryan Y. Hong, Martina Hřebíčková, Sylvie Graf, Paweł Izdebski, Lars Lundmann, Lars Penke, Marco Perugini, Giulio Costantini, John Rauthmann, Matthias Ziegler, Anu Realo, Liisalotte Elme, Tatsuya Sato, Shizuka Kawamoto, Piotr Szarota,
Jessica L. Tracy, Marcel A. G. van Aken, Yu Yang, David C. Funder,
Piotr Szarota
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
David C. Funder
University of California, Riverside
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David Funder, Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA. Email: [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorAuthor affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
Data gathering was assisted by Joanne Fullerton, Danique van den Hanenberg, Sakiko Kumagai, and Elizabet Orekhova. Portions of the U.S. and Japanese data were utilized in an earlier paper (Funder, Guillaume, Kumagi, Kawamoto, & Sato, 2012), but all of the analyses reported here are new.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to quantitatively compare everyday situational experience around the world.
Local collaborators recruited 5,447 members of college communities in 20 countries, who provided data via a Web site in 14 languages. Using the 89 items of the Riverside Situational Q-sort (RSQ), participants described the situation they experienced the previous evening at 7:00 p.m.
Correlations among the average situational profiles of each country ranged from r = .73 to r = .95; the typical situation was described as largely pleasant. Most similar were the United States/Canada; least similar were South Korea/Denmark. Japan had the most homogenous situational experience; South Korea, the least. The 15 RSQ items varying the most across countries described relatively negative aspects of situational experience; the 15 least varying items were more positive. Further analyses correlated RSQ items with national scores on six value dimensions, the Big Five traits, economic output, and population. Individualism, Neuroticism, Openness, and Gross Domestic Product yielded more significant correlations than expected by chance.
Psychological research traditionally has paid more attention to the assessment of persons than of situations, a discrepancy that extends to cross-cultural psychology. The present study demonstrates how cultures vary in situational experience in psychologically meaningful ways.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site, or at www.rap.ucr.edu/pub17.pdf.
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| jopy12176-sup-0001-suppinfo.pdf160.7 KB |
Significant RSQ Correlates of Power Distance, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of Masculinity, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of Long-term Orientation, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of Extraversion, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of Agreeableness, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of Openness, across countries Significant RSQ Correlates of per-capita GNP, across countries Mean RSQ Placement of 15 most varying items, for each of 20 countries Mean RSQ Placement of 15 least varying items, for each of 20 countries |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Allik, J., Mõttus, R., Realo, A., Pullmann, H., Trifonova, A., McCrae, R.R. , & 56 Members of the Russian Character and Personality Survey. (2009). Personality traits of Russians from the observer's perspective. European Journal of Personality, 23, 567–588.
- Bem, D.J., & Funder, D.C. (1978). Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 85, 485–501.
- Berry, J.W. (1980). Introduction to methodology. In H.C. Triandis & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Original work published 1961).
- Block, J., & Block, J.H. (1981). Studying situational dimensions: A grand perspective and some limited empiricism. In D.M. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 85–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Brown, D.E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Central Intelligence Agency. (2014). World factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2119rank.html
- Ching, C.M., Church, T.A., Katigbak, M.S., Reyes, J.A.S., Tanaka-Matsumic, J., Takaokac, S., et al. (2013). The manifestation of traits in everyday behavior and affect: A five-country study. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 1–16.
- Church, A.T. (2010). Current perspectives in the study of personality across countries. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 5, 441–449. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375559
- Church, A.T., Katigbak, M. S., Ching, C.M., Zhang, H., Shen, J., Mazuera Arias, R., et al. (2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation/behavior approaches across countries. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922–935.
- Church, A.T., Katigbak, M.S., & del Prado, A.M. (2010). Cultural similarities and differences in perceived affordances of situations for Big Five behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 78–90.
- Edwards, J.A., & Templeton, A. (2005). The structure of perceived qualities of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 705–723.
- Flere, S., & Lavrič, M. (2008). On the validity of cross-cultural social studies using student samples. Field Methods, 20, 399–412.
- Forgas, J.P., & van Heck, G.L. (1992). The psychology of situations. In G. Caprara & G.L. Heck (Eds.), Modern personality psychology: Critical reviews and new directions (pp. 418–455). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
- Frake, C.O. (1980). Language and cultural description: Essays by Charles O. Frake. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Funder, D.C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.
- Funder, D.C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.
- Funder, D.C., Furr, R.M., & Colvin, C.R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489.
- Funder, D.C., & Guillaume E. (2013). Revised RSQ for international research (version 3.15). Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Riverside.
-
Funder, D.C.,
Guillaume, E.,
Kumagi, S.,
Kawamoto, S., &
Sato, T. (2012). The person-situation debate and the assessment of situations. Japanese Journal of Personality, 21, 1–11.
10.2132/personality.21.1 Google Scholar
- Furr, R.M., Wagerman, S.A., & Funder, D.C. (2010). Personality as manifest in behavior: Direct behavioral observation using the revised Riverside Behavioral Q-sort (RBQ-3.0). In C.R. Agnew, D.E. Carlston, W.G. Graziano, & J.R. Kelly (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 186–204). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gelfand, M.J. (2007, March 7). Situated culture: A multilevel analysis of situational constraint across 35 nations. Colloquium delivered at the University of California, Berkeley.
- Gelfand, M.J., Raver, J.L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L.M., Lun, J., Lim, B.C., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose countries: A 33-nation study. Science, doi:10.1126/science.1197754
- Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., & Kaplan, H. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
- Haig, B.D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371–388.
-
Haig, B.D. (2014). Investigating the psychological world: Scientific method in the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262027366.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Heine, S.J., Lehman, D.R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.
- Hofstede Centre. (n.d.). Countries. Retrieved from http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html
-
Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 13, 46–74.
10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358 Google Scholar
- Hřebíčková, M., & Graf, S. (2014). Accuracy of national stereotypes in central Europe: Outgroups are not better than ingroups in considering personality traits of real people. European Journal of Personality, 28, 60–72. doi:10.1002/per.1904
- International Monetary Fund. (2014). World Economic Outlook Data Base. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/index.aspx
-
Kelley, H.H.,
Holmes, J.G.,
Kerr, N.L.,
Reis, H.T.,
Rusbult, C.E., &
van Lange, P.A.M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511499845 Google Scholar
- Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., Matsumonot, H., & Narasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245–1267.
- Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890–903.
- Kluckhohn, C., & Murray, H.A. (1953). Personality in nature, society, and country. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
- Magnusson, D. (1971). An analysis of situational dimensions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 851–867.
- Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 29, 63–87.
- Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R.E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.
-
McCrae, R.R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures. In R R . McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 105–126). New York: Plenum Publishers.
10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6 Google Scholar
- McCrae, R.R. , & Allik, J. (Eds). (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality across countries. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- McCrae, R.R., Chan, W., Jussim, L., De Fruyt, F., Löckenhoff, C.E., De Bolle, M., et al. (2013). The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 831–842.
- McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
- Morse, P., Neel, R., Todd, E., & Funder, D.C. (2014). Renovating situation taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental motive situation types. Journal of Personality, doi:10.1111/jopy.12111
- Oyserman, D. (in press). Culture as situated cognition. Emerging Trends in the Social Sciences.
- Realo, A., Allik, J., Lonnqvist, J.E., Verkasalo, M., Kwiatkowska, A., Kööts, L., et al. (2009). Mechanisms of the national character stereotype: How people in six neighboring countries of Russia describe themselves and the typical Russian. European Journal of Personality, 23, 229–249.
- Reis, H.T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311–329.
- Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
- Ross, C.E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 189–197.
- Saucier, G., Bel-Bahar, T., & Fernandez, C. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situational variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479–504.
- Schmitt, D.P. Allik, J., McCrae, R.R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.
- Serfass, D.G., & Sherman, R.A. (2013). Personality and perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708–718.
- Sherman, R.A., & Funder, D.C. (2009). Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance. Journal of Research in Personality, 99, 330–343.
- Sherman, R.A., Nave, C.N., & Funder, D.C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343.
- Sherman, R.A., Nave, C.S., & Funder, D.C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87–101.
- Sherman, R.A., Nave, C.S., & Funder, D.C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1–14.
- Sherman, R.A., & Serfass, D.G. (in press). The comprehensive approach to analyzing multivariate constructs. Journal of Research in Personality.
- Shweder, R.A. (1991). Thinking through countries: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- ten Berge, M.A., & De Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective: A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337–360.
- Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A.M., Ádám, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C.K., Ahn, H.-N., et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 countries. Science, 310, 96–100.
- Todd, E., & Funder, D.C. (2012, January). Personality correlates of unique perceptions of brief film situations. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego.
- Triandis, H.C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407– 415. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407
- Tsai, J., & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. (2003). Variation among European Americans in emotional facial expression. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 34, 650–657.
- United Nations Statistics Division. (2015). GDP and its breakdown at current prices in US Dollars. New York: United Nations.
- Valsiner, J. (2003). Culture and its transfer: Ways of creating general knowledge through the study of cultural particulars. In W.J. Lonner, D.L. Dinnel, S.A. Hayes, & D.N. Sattler (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 2, Chapter 12). Bellingham, WA: Center for Cross-Cultural Research, Western Washington University. Retrieved from http://www.wwu.edu/culture/Valsiner.htm
- Van Heck, G.L. (1984). The construction of a general taxonomy of situations. In H. Bonarius, G.L. Heck, & N. Smid (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 149–164). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
- van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In D. Matsumoto & F.J.R . Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Wagerman, S.A., &
Funder, D.C. (2009). Personality psychology of situations. In P.J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 27–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511596544.005 Google Scholar
- Yang, Y., Read, S.J., & Miller, L.C. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750–778.
